GMASS 2148 , the SIMBAD biblio

GMASS 2148 , the SIMBAD biblio (35 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2026.10.16CEST05:59:50

Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords 		in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS) 		Title First 3 Authors
2002A&A...384...81H viz 401 14 ESO Imaging Survey. Exploring the optical/infrared imaging data of CDF-S: Point sources. HATZIMINAOGLOU E., GROENEWEGEN M.A.T., DA COSTA L., et al.
2003A&A...403..493M viz 4820 24 H-band observations of the Chandra Deep Field South. MOY E., BARMBY P., RIGOPOULOU D., et al.
2004ApJ...600L..93G viz 15       D               1 7819 1453 The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: initial results from optical and near-infrared imaging. GIAVALISCO M., FERGUSON H.C., KOEKEMOER A.M., et al.
2005MNRAS.361..525D viz 84 46 The Las Campanas Infrared Survey - V. Keck spectroscopy of a large sample of extremely red objects. DOHERTY M., BUNKER A.J., ELLIS R.S., et al.
2006A&A...449..951G viz 1278 302 The GOODS-MUSIC sample: a multicolour catalog of near-IR selected galaxies in the GOODS-South field. GRAZIAN A., FONTANA A., DE SANTIS C., et al.
2006ApJ...653...53B viz 15       D               593 342 Galaxies at z ∼ 6: the UV luminosity function and luminosity density from 506 HUDF, HUDF parallel ACS field, and GOODS i-dropouts. BOUWENS R.J., ILLINGWORTH G.D., BLAKESLEE J.P., et al.
2007A&A...465..393G 2 10 87 A comparison of LBGs, DRGs, and BzK galaxies: their contribution to the stellar mass density in the GOODS-MUSIC sample. GRAZIAN A., SALIMBENI S., PENTERICCI L., et al.
2008A&A...482...21C 13 17 459 GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z ∼ 2. II. Superdense passive galaxies: how did they form and evolve? CIMATTI A., CASSATA P., POZZETTI L., et al.
2009Msngr.135...40K 75               F     1 10 4 A VLT large programme to study galaxies at z ∼ 2: GMASS - the Galaxy Mass Assembly Ultra-deep Spectroscopy Survey. KURK J., CIMATTI A., DADDI E., et al.
2009ApJ...704L..34C 95       D         F     1 14 158 Dynamical masses of early-type galaxies at z ∼ 2: are they truly superdense? CAPPELLARI M., DI SEREGO ALIGHIERI S., CIMATTI A., et al.
2009A&A...504..331K 165       D S   X         4 52 89 GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z ∼ 2. V. Witnessing the assembly at z = 1.6 of a galaxy cluster. KURK J., CIMATTI A., ZAMORANI G., et al.
2011ApJ...729...48B 15       D               1 135 15 Differential morphology between rest-frame optical and ultraviolet emission from 1.5 < z < 3 star-forming galaxies. BOND N.A., GAWISER E. and KOEKEMOER A.M.
2011ApJS..195...10X viz 15       D               1 782 508 The Chandra Deep Field-South survey: 4 Ms source catalogs. XUE Y.Q., LUO B., BRANDT W.N., et al.
2011ApJ...739L..44D viz 15       D               1 417 135 Red nuggets at high redshift: structural evolution of quiescent galaxies over 10 Gyr of cosmic history. DAMJANOV I., ABRAHAM R.G., GLAZEBROOK K., et al.
2011ApJ...743..146C viz 15       D               1 4132 61 Active and passive galaxies at z ∼ 2: rest-frame optical morphologies with WFC3. CAMERON E., CAROLLO C.M., OESCH P.A., et al.
2012ApJ...749...53R 15       D               1 31 42 The size evolution of passive galaxies: observations from the Wide-Field Camera 3 Early Release Science program. RYAN R.E.Jr, McCARTHY P.J., COHEN S.H., et al.
2013A&A...549A..63K viz 54       D     X         2 245 70 GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z ∼ 2. VII. Sample selection and spectroscopy. KURK J., CIMATTI A., DADDI E., et al.
2014MNRAS.440.3630R 15       D               2 74 9 Evidence for two modes of black hole accretion in massive galaxies at z ∼ 2. RANGEL C., NANDRA K., BARRO G., et al.
2014ApJS..214...24S viz 15       D               1 97940 733 3D-HST WFC3-selected photometric catalogs in the five CANDELS/3D-HST fields: photometry, photometric redshifts, and stellar masses. SKELTON R.E., WHITAKER K.E., MOMCHEVA I.G., et al.
2014ApJ...796...60H viz 15       D               1 1489 120 CANDELS/GOODS-S, CDFS, and ECDFS : photometric redshifts for normal and X-Ray-detected galaxies. HSU L.-T., SALVATO M., NANDRA K., et al.
2015MNRAS.450..763M 16       D               1 58 16 Star formation and quenching among the most massive galaxies at z ∼ 1.7. MANCINI C., RENZINI A., DADDI E., et al.
2015ApJ...815..129S viz 16       D               1 212 14 Eddington ratio distribution of x-ray-selected broad-line AGNs at 1.0 < z < 2.2. SUH H., HASINGER G., STEINHARDT C., et al.
2016MNRAS.457..629C viz 16       D               1 650 33 ZFOURGE catalogue of AGN candidates: an enhancement of 160-µm-derived star formation rates in active galaxies to z = 3.2. COWLEY M.J., SPITLER L.R., TRAN K.-V.H., et al.
2016ApJS..225...27M viz 16       D               1 19341 548 The 3D-HST survey: Hubble Space Telescope WFC3/G141 grism spectra, redshifts, and emission line measurements for ∼ 100,000 galaxies. MOMCHEVA I.G., BRAMMER G.B., VAN DOKKUM P.G., et al.
2016ApJ...830...51S viz 16       D               1 67525 168 The FourStar galaxy evolution survey (ZFOURGE): ultraviolet to far-infrared catalogs, medium-bandwidth photometric redshifts with improved accuracy, stellar masses, and confirmation of quiescent galaxies to z ∼ 3.5. STRAATMAN C.M.S., SPITLER L.R., QUADRI R.F., et al.
2017ApJS..228....2L viz 16       D               1 1061 334 The Chandra Deep Field-South survey: 7 Ms source catalogs. LUO B., BRANDT W.N., XUE Y.Q., et al.
2018MNRAS.475.1288S 16       D               1 150 48 Identifying the subtle signatures of feedback from distant AGN using ALMA observations and the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulations. SCHOLTZ J., ALEXANDER D.M., HARRISON C.M., et al.
2018ApJ...856....8C 16       D               1 102 6 The KMOS Cluster Survey (KCS). II. The effect of environment on the structural properties of massive Cluster galaxies at redshift 1.39 < z < 1.61. CHAN J.C.C., BEIFIORI A., SAGLIA R.P., et al.
2018MNRAS.475.5133R viz 16       D               1 11242 2 Testing the hierarchical assembly of massive galaxies using accurate merger rates out to z ∼ 1.5. RODRIGUES M., PUECH M., FLORES H., et al.
2018MNRAS.478.3721S viz 265 8 Deep ALMA photometry of distant X-ray AGN: improvements in star formation rate constraints, and AGN identification. STANLEY F., HARRISON C.M., ALEXANDER D.M., et al.
2019ApJ...887...23B viz 16       D               1 942 ~ A submillimeter perspective on the GOODS fields (SUPER GOODS). IV. The submillimeter properties of X-ray sources in the CDF-S. BARGER A.J., COWIE L.L., BAUER F.E., et al.
2020MNRAS.492.1887G viz 16       D               1 792 ~ Physical properties of the CDFS X-ray sources through fitting spectral energy distributions. GUO X., GU Q., DING N., et al.
2020ApJ...899...87M 16       D               1 57 20 The kinematics of massive quiescent galaxies at 1.4 < z < 2.1: dark matter fractions, IMF variation, and the relation to local early-type galaxies. MENDEL J.T., BEIFIORI A., SAGLIA R.P., et al.
2020ApJ...905..170M viz 16       D               1 4760 24 Galaxy sizes since z = 2 from the perspective of stellar mass distribution within galaxies. MOSLEH M., HOSSEINNEJAD S., HOSSEINI-SHAHISAVANDI S.Z., et al.
2025ApJ...987...46Z 19       D               1 466 ~ Identifying Compton-thick Active Galactic Nuclei with a Machine Learning Algorithm in Chandra Deep Field-South. ZHANG R., GUO X., GU Q., et al.

goto View the references in ADS