KOI-399 , the SIMBAD biblio

KOI-399 , the SIMBAD biblio (42 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2026.10.16CEST13:03:10


Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords
in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS)
Title First 3 Authors
2011ApJ...736...19B viz 15       D               1 1507 867 Characteristics of planetary candidates observed by Kepler. II. Analysis of the first four months of data. BORUCKI W.J., KOCH D.G., BASRI G., et al.
2011AJ....142..160S viz 15       D               3 2328 365 Kepler eclipsing binary stars. II. 2165 eclipsing binaries in the second data release. SLAWSON R.W., PRSA A., WELSH W.F., et al.
2012ApJS..199...24T viz 15       D               1 5394 66 Detection of potential transit signals in the first three quarters of Kepler mission data. TENENBAUM P., CHRISTIANSEN J.L., JENKINS J.M., et al.
2013ApJ...768...33R 16       D               3 42 137 Triple-star candidates among the Kepler binaries. RAPPAPORT S., DECK K., LEVINE A., et al.
2013MNRAS.436.1883W viz 15       D               1 961 136 Rotation periods, variability properties and ages for Kepler exoplanet candidate host stars. WALKOWICZ L.M. and BASRI G.S.
2014ApJS..210...19B viz 15       D               1 5860 211 Planetary candidates observed by Kepler IV: planet sample from Q1-Q8 (22 months). BURKE C.J., BRYSON S.T., MULLALLY F., et al.
2014MNRAS.437.3473A viz 15       D               1 2614 45 A catalogue of temperatures for Kepler eclipsing binary stars. ARMSTRONG D.J., GOMEZ MAQUEO CHEW Y., FAEDI F., et al.
2014AJ....147..119C viz 15       D               2 8013 91 Contamination in the Kepler field. Identification of 685 KOIs as false positives via ephemeris matching based on Q1-Q12 data. COUGHLIN J.L., THOMPSON S.E., BRYSON S.T., et al.
2015ApJS..217...16R viz 16       D               1 8625 149 Planetary candidates observed by Kepler. V. Planet sample from Q1-Q12 (36 months). ROWE J.F., COUGHLIN J.L., ANTOCI V., et al.
2015MNRAS.448..946B viz 680       D     X C       17 42 103 Eclipse timing variation analyses of eccentric binaries with close tertiaries in the Kepler field. BORKOVITS T., RAPPAPORT S., HAJDU T., et al.
2016MNRAS.455.4136B viz 16       D               3 249 150 A comprehensive study of the Kepler triples via eclipse timing. BORKOVITS T., HAJDU T., SZTAKOVICS J., et al.
2016AJ....151...68K viz 16       D               5 2915 316 Kepler eclipsing binary stars. VII. The catalog of eclipsing binaries found in the entire Kepler data set. KIRK B., CONROY K., PRSA A., et al.
2016ApJ...822...86M viz 16       D               1 6130 337 False positive probabilities for all Kepler objects of interest: 1284 newly validated planets and 428 likely false positives. MORTON T.D., BRYSON S.T., COUGHLIN J.L., et al.
2016ApJ...824...15V viz 16       D               1 982 20 Orbital circularization of hot and cool Kepler eclipsing binaries. VAN EYLEN V., WINN J.N. and ALBRECHT S.
2016ApJS..225...32B viz 16       D               1 1473 266 Spectral properties of cool stars: extended abundance analysis of 1,617 planet-search stars. BREWER J.M., FISCHER D.A., VALENTI J.A., et al.
2016ApJ...829...23D viz 16       D               1 4045 212 The Kepler catalog of stellar flares. DAVENPORT J.R.A.
2017MNRAS.465.2634A viz 16       D               1 5400 21 Transit shapes and self-organizing maps as a tool for ranking planetary candidates: application to Kepler and K2. ARMSTRONG D.J., POLLACCO D. and SANTERNE A.
2017ApJS..230...19B 16       D               1 16 2 An advanced N-body model for interacting multiple stellar systems. BROZ M.
2017AJ....154..107P viz 16       D               1 1306 226 The California-Kepler Survey. I. High-resolution spectroscopy of 1305 stars hosting Kepler transiting planets. PETIGURA E.A., HOWARD A.W., MARCY G.W., et al.
2017AJ....154..108J viz 16       D               2 3237 137 The California-Kepler Survey. II. Precise physical properties of 2025 Kepler planets and their host stars. JOHNSON J.A., PETIGURA E.A., FULTON B.J., et al.
2018ApJ...855..115B viz 16       D               1 1305 5 Identifying young Kepler planet host stars from Keck-HIRES spectra of lithium. BERGER T.A., HOWARD A.W. and BOESGAARD A.M.
2018A&A...610A..72Z 16       D               1 27 2 The extraneous eclipses on binary light curves: KIC 5255552, KIC 10091110, and KIC 11495766. ZHANG J., QIAN S.B., WANG S.M., et al.
2018MNRAS.474.2094A viz 16       D               1 1073 143 Inferring probabilistic stellar rotation periods using Gaussian processes. ANGUS R., MORTON T., AIGRAIN S., et al.
2018ApJ...861..149F viz 16       D               1 2261 6 The Kepler Follow-up Observation Program. II. Stellar parameters from medium- and high-resolution spectroscopy. FURLAN E., CIARDI D.R., COCHRAN W.D., et al.
2018AJ....156..264F viz 16       D               1 1909 365 The California-Kepler Survey. VII. Precise planet radii leveraging Gaia DR2 reveal the stellar mass dependence of the Planet radius gap. FULTON B.J. and PETIGURA E.A.
2018AJ....156..297S 442           X C       10 8 ~ Accurate computation of light curves and the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect in multibody eclipsing systems. SHORT D.R., OROSZ J.A., WINDMILLER G., et al.
2019MNRAS.483.1934B 41           X         1 19 7 Photodynamical analysis of the triply eclipsing hierarchical triple system EPIC 249432662. BORKOVITS T., RAPPAPORT S., KAYE T., et al.
2019ApJ...875...29M viz 16       D               1 2918 72 A spectroscopic analysis of the California-Kepler Survey sample. I. Stellar parameters, planetary radii, and a slope in the radius gap. MARTINEZ C.F., CUNHA K., GHEZZI L., et al.
2019ApJ...879...69T viz 16       D               1 222610 141 The Payne: self-consistent ab initio fitting of stellar spectra. TING Y.-S., CONROY C., RIX H.-W., et al.
2020A&A...636A..85S viz 16       D               1 3696 ~ Derivation of parameters for 3748 FGK stars using H-band spectra from APOGEE Data Release 14. SARMENTO P., DELGADO MENA E., ROJAS-AYALA B., et al.
2020MNRAS.496.4624B 16       D               1 22 ~ The compact triply eclipsing triple star TIC 209409435 discovered with TESS. BORKOVITS T., RAPPAPORT S.A., TAN T.G., et al.
2020AJ....160..120J viz 16       D               1 365763 238 APOGEE data and spectral analysis from SDSS Data Release 16: seven years of observations including first results from APOGEE-South. JONSSON H., HOLTZMAN J.A., ALLENDE PRIETO C., et al.
2021MNRAS.504.5327A 17       D               1 7000 19 Exoplanet validation with machine learning: 50 new validated Kepler planets. ARMSTRONG D.J., GAMPER J. and DAMOULAS T.
2021AJ....162..184K viz 17       D               1 8106 31 Double-lined spectroscopic binaries in the APOGEE DR16 and DR17 data. KOUNKEL M., COVEY K.R., STASSUN K.G., et al.
2022AJ....163..152S viz 17       D               1 583193 11 APOGEE Net: An Expanded Spectral Model of Both Low-mass and High-mass Stars. SPRAGUE D., CULHANE C., KOUNKEL M., et al.
2022AJ....163..179P viz 17       D               1 2962 39 The California-Kepler Survey. X. The Radius Gap as a Function of Stellar Mass, Metallicity, and Age. PETIGURA E.A., ROGERS J.G., ISAACSON H., et al.
2022ApJS..259...35A viz 17       D               1 611005 320 The Seventeenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: Complete Release of MaNGA, MaStar, and APOGEE-2 Data. ABDURRO'UF, ACCETTA K., AERTS C., et al.
2022A&A...663A...4S viz 17       D               1 14206 7 Assessment of [Fe/H] determinations for FGK stars in spectroscopic surveys. SOUBIRAN C., BROUILLET N. and CASAMIQUELA L.
2023ApJS..265...50C viz 17       D               1 2291 ~ Characterization of Low-mass Companions to Kepler Objects of Interest Observed with APOGEE-N. CANAS C.I., BENDER C.F., MAHADEVAN S., et al.
2023A&A...672A.176P viz 17       D               2 2155 2 Mass-ratio distribution of contact binary stars. PESTA M. and PEJCHA O.
2024A&A...685A..62I viz 18       D               4 2906 ~ Automated eccentricity measurement from raw eclipsing binary light curves with intrinsic variability. IJSPEERT L.W., TKACHENKO A., JOHNSTON C., et al.
2025A&A...695A.209B 112       D     X         3 275 ~ Then and now: A new look at the eclipse timing variations of hierarchical triple star candidates in the primordial Kepler field, revisited by TESS. BORKOVITS T., RAPPAPORT S.A., MITNYAN T., et al.

goto View the references in ADS