Kepler-565 , the SIMBAD biblio

Kepler-565 , the SIMBAD biblio (27 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2026.10.14CEST23:21:42

Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords 		in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS) 		Title First 3 Authors
2011ApJ...728..117B viz 15       D               1 321 310 Characteristics of Kepler planetary candidates based on the first data set. BORUCKI W.J., KOCH D.G., BASRI G., et al.
2011ApJ...736...19B viz 15       D               1 1507 867 Characteristics of planetary candidates observed by Kepler. II. Analysis of the first four months of data. BORUCKI W.J., KOCH D.G., BASRI G., et al.
2011ApJ...738..170M viz 15       D               1 997 230 On the low false positive probabilities of Kepler planet candidates. MORTON T.D. and JOHNSON J.A.
2011ApJS..197....2F viz 15       D               1 980 66 Transit timing observations from Kepler. I. Statistical analysis of the first four months. FORD E.B., ROWE J.F., FABRYCKY D.C., et al.
2012ApJS..199...24T viz 15       D               1 5394 66 Detection of potential transit signals in the first three quarters of Kepler mission data. TENENBAUM P., CHRISTIANSEN J.L., JENKINS J.M., et al.
2012ApJ...752...53L 15       D               1 320 18 Debris disks in Kepler exoplanet systems. LAWLER S.M. and GLADMAN B.
2012ApJ...756..185F viz 15       D               1 1856 44 Transit timing observations from Kepler. V. Transit timing variation candidates in the first sixteen months from polynomial models. FORD E.B., RAGOZZINE D., ROWE J.F., et al.
2012ApJ...756..186S viz 15       D               1 811 35 Transit timing observations from Kepler. VI. Potentially interesting candidate systems from fourier-based statistical tests. STEFFEN J.H., FORD E.B., ROWE J.F., et al.
2013ApJS..208...16M viz 15       D               1 1518 139 Transit timing observations from Kepler. VIII. Catalog of transit timing measurements of the first twelve quarters. MAZEH T., NACHMANI G., HOLCZER T., et al.
2013MNRAS.436.1883W viz 15       D               1 961 136 Rotation periods, variability properties and ages for Kepler exoplanet candidate host stars. WALKOWICZ L.M. and BASRI G.S.
2014ApJS..210...19B viz 15       D               1 5860 211 Planetary candidates observed by Kepler IV: planet sample from Q1-Q8 (22 months). BURKE C.J., BRYSON S.T., MULLALLY F., et al.
2014AJ....147..119C viz 15       D               1 8013 91 Contamination in the Kepler field. Identification of 685 KOIs as false positives via ephemeris matching based on Q1-Q12 data. COUGHLIN J.L., THOMPSON S.E., BRYSON S.T., et al.
2015ApJS..217...16R viz 16       D               1 8625 149 Planetary candidates observed by Kepler. V. Planet sample from Q1-Q12 (36 months). ROWE J.F., COUGHLIN J.L., ANTOCI V., et al.
2015ApJ...809....8B viz 16       D               1 112329 282 Terrestrial planet occurrence rates for the Kepler GK dwarf sample. BURKE C.J., CHRISTIANSEN J.L., MULLALLY F., et al.
2016ApJ...822...86M viz 16       D               1 6130 337 False positive probabilities for all Kepler objects of interest: 1284 newly validated planets and 428 likely false positives. MORTON T.D., BRYSON S.T., COUGHLIN J.L., et al.
2017MNRAS.465.2634A viz 16       D               1 5400 21 Transit shapes and self-organizing maps as a tool for ranking planetary candidates: application to Kepler and K2. ARMSTRONG D.J., POLLACCO D. and SANTERNE A.
2017A&A...603A..30S viz 16       D               2 2500 58 Observational evidence for two distinct giant planet populations. SANTOS N.C., ADIBEKYAN V., FIGUEIRA P., et al.
2018AJ....155..161Z viz 16       D               2 1274 24 Robo-AO Kepler survey. IV. The effect of nearby stars on 3857 planetary candidate systems. ZIEGLER C., LAW N.M., BARANEC C., et al.
2018AJ....156...83Z viz 16       D               1 337 14 Robo-AO Kepler Survey. V. The effect of physically associated stellar companions on planetary systems. ZIEGLER C., LAW N.M., BARANEC C., et al.
2020ApJ...890...23L viz 16       D               1 4936 35 Current population statistics do not favor photoevaporation over core-powered mass loss as the dominant cause of the exoplanet radius gap. LOYD R.O.P., SHKOLNIK E.L., SCHNEIDER A.C., et al.
2021MNRAS.504.5327A 17       D               1 7000 19 Exoplanet validation with machine learning: 50 new validated Kepler planets. ARMSTRONG D.J., GAMPER J. and DAMOULAS T.
2021ApJS..255...17S viz 17       D               1 39591 57 Surface rotation and photometric activity for Kepler targets. II. G and F main-sequence stars and cool subgiant stars. SANTOS A.R.G., BRETON S.N., MATHUR S., et al.
2023A&A...679L..12G viz 17       D               1 796 ~ Stellar spectral-type (mass) dependence of the dearth of close-in planets around fast-rotating stars Architecture of Kepler confirmed single-exoplanet systems compared to star-planet evolution models. GARCIA R.A., GOURVES C., SANTOS A.R.G., et al.
2024AJ....168..129S viz 18       D               2 350 ~ Revising Properties of Planet-Host Binary Systems. IV. The Radius Distribution of Small Planets in Binary Star Systems Is Dependent on Stellar Separation. SULLIVAN K., KRAUS A.L., BERGER T.A., et al.
2024A&A...689A.250C viz 18       D               1 3075 ~ Mapping the exo-Neptunian landscape A ridge between the desert and savanna. CASTRO-GONZALEZ A., BOURRIER V., LILLO-BOX J., et al.
2024A&A...691A..53S viz 18       D               1 4078 ~ SWEET-Cat: A view on the planetary mass-radius relation. SOUSA S.G., ADIBEKYAN V., DELGADO-MENA E., et al.
2025AJ....169...29S 19       D               2 39 ~ Quantifying the Contamination from nearby Stellar Companions in Gaia DR3 Photometry. SULLIVAN K., KRAUS A.L., BERGER T.A., et al.

goto View the references in ADS