SIMBAD references

1995A&A...296..819V - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 296819-822 (1995/4-3)

Galactic magnetic field strengths, from three different methods - a cautionary note.

VALLEE J.P.

Abstract (from CDS):

Recent cosmic-ray data have led to the suggestion that the magnetic field B in late-type galaxies may be quite large, i.e. B>3Beq, where B_ eq_ is the magnetic field derived from the equipartition method (e.g., Chi & Wolfendale 1993IAUS..100..159B; Zweibel 1993Natur.362..591Z). Previous radio data had led to the claim that the magnetic field B in late-type galaxies was close to Beq, i.e. 0.3Beq<B<3Beq (Duric 1990IAUS..140..235D) and 0.75Beq<B<1.25Beq (Hummel 1986A&A...160L...4H). It is important now to evaluate whether the real magnetic field B is far or close to Beq. Here, a statistical study is carried out of the three methods often employed to give magnetic field strengths, namely (i) the Faraday rotation method, (ii) the Equipartition method, and (iii) the Cosmic-ray particle method. I use statistics with small observational samples to find that two independent methods (Faraday rotation Bfa and Equipartition Beq) are converging on similar values of the magnetic field strength. For the available observational data, I find on average that 1.0Beq<Bfa<1.2Beq. This convergent result, by two independent methods, strongly suggests that the real magnetic field B≃Bfa≃Beq. The third method (cosmic-ray particle Bcr) appears at times to predict magnetic field strengths different than those of the other two methods. Thus a caution is in order; possible reasons for that divergence are discussed.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): ISM: magnetic field - polarization - cosmic rays

Simbad objects: 8

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:1995A&A...296..819V and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu