2008A&A...479L..21W -
Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 479L21-24 (2008/2-3)
J, H, K spectro-interferometry of the Mira variable S Orionis.
WITTKOWSKI M., BOBOLTZ D.A., DRIEBE T., LE BOUQUIN J.-B., MILLOUR F., OHNAKA K. and SCHOLZ M.
Abstract (from CDS):
We present J, H, K spectrally dispersed interferometry with a spectral resolution of 35 for the Mira variable S Orionis. We aim at measuring the diameter variation as a function of wavelength that is expected due to molecular layers lying above the continuum-forming photosphere. Our final goal is a better understanding of the pulsating atmosphere and its role in the mass-loss process. Visibility data of S Ori were obtained at phase 0.78 with the VLTI/AMBER instrument using the fringe tracker FINITO at 29 spectral channels between 1.29µm and 2.32µm. Apparent uniform disk (UD) diameters were computed for each spectral channel. In addition, the visibility data were directly compared to predictions by recent self-excited dynamic model atmospheres. S Ori shows significant variations in the visibility values as a function of spectral channel that can only be described by a clear variation in the apparent angular size with wavelength. The closure phase values are close to zero at all spectral channels, indicating the absence of asymmetric intensity features. The apparent UD angular diameter is smallest at about 1.3µm and 1.7µm and increases by a factor of ∼1.4 around 2.0µm. The minimum UD angular diameter at near-continuum wavelengths is ΘUD=8.1±0.5mas, corresponding to R∼420R☉. The S Ori visibility data and the apparent UD variations can be explained reasonably well by a dynamic atmosphere model that includes molecular layers, particularly water vapor and CO. The best-fitting photospheric angular diameter of the model atmosphere is ΘPhot=8.3±0.2mas, consistent with the UD diameter measured at near-continuum wavelengths. The measured visibility and UD diameter variations with wavelength resemble and generally confirm the predictions by recent dynamic model atmospheres. These size variations with wavelength can be understood as the effects from water vapor and CO layers lying above the continuum-forming photosphere. The major remaining differences between observations and model prediction are very likely due to an imperfect match of the phase and cycle combination between observation and available models.
Abstract Copyright:
∼
Journal keyword(s):
techniques: interferometric - stars: AGB and post-AGB - stars: atmospheres - stars: individual: S Ori - stars: mass-loss
Simbad objects:
6
Full paper
View the references in ADS
To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2008A&A...479L..21W and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu