SIMBAD references

2010A&A...518L..24N - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 518L24-24 (2010/7-2)

The star-formation rates of 1.5 < z < 2.5 massive galaxies.

NORDON R., LUTZ D., SHAO L., MAGNELLI B., BERTA S., ALTIERI B., ANDREANI P., AUSSEL H., BONGIOVANNI A., CAVA A., CEPA J., CIMATTI A., DADDI E., DOMINGUEZ H., ELBAZ D., FOERSTER SCHREIBER N.M., GENZEL R., GRAZIAN A., MAGDIS G., MAIOLINO R., PEREZ GARCIA A.M., POGLITSCH A., POPESSO P., POZZI F., RIGUCCINI L., RODIGHIERO G., SAINTONGE A., SANCHEZ-PORTAL M., SANTINI P., STURM E., TACCONI L., VALTCHANOV I., WETZSTEIN M. and WIEPRECHT E.

Abstract (from CDS):

The star formation rate (SFR) is a key parameter in the study of galaxy evolution. The accuracy of SFR measurements at z∼2 has been questioned following a disagreement between observations and theoretical models. The latter predict SFRs at this redshift that are typically a factor 4 or more lower than the measurements. We present star-formation rates based on calorimetric measurements of the far-infrared (FIR) luminosities for massive 1.5<z<2.5, normal star-forming galaxies (SFGs), which do not depend on extinction corrections and/or extrapolations of spectral energy distributions. The measurements are based on observations in GOODS-N with the Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) onboard Herschel, as part of the PACS evolutionary probe (PEP) project, that resolve for the first time individual SFGs at these redshifts at FIR wavelengths. We compare FIR-based SFRs to the more commonly used 24µm and UV SFRs. We find that SFRs from 24µm alone are higher by a factor of ∼4-7.5 than the true SFRs. This overestimation depends on luminosity: gradually increasing for log L(24 µm)>12.2L☉. The SFGs and AGNs tend to exhibit the same 24 µm excess. The UV SFRs are in closer agreement with the FIR-based SFRs. Using a Calzetti UV extinction correction results in a mean excess of up to 0.3dex and a scatter of 0.35dex from the FIR SFRs. The previous UV SFRs are thus confirmed and the mean excess, while narrowing the gap, is insufficient to explain the discrepancy between the observed SFRs and simulation predictions.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: evolution - galaxies: starburst - galaxies: fundamental parameters - cosmology: observations - infrared: galaxies

Simbad objects: 1

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2010A&A...518L..24N and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu