SIMBAD references

2015MNRAS.449..451W - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 449, 451-466 (2015/May-1)

Machine learning for transient discovery in Pan-STARRS1 difference imaging.

WRIGHT D.E., SMARTT S.J., SMITH K.W., MILLER P., KOTAK R., REST A., BURGETT W.S., CHAMBERS K.C., FLEWELLING H., HODAPP K.W., HUBER M., JEDICKE R., KAISER N., METCALFE N., PRICE P.A., TONRY J.L., WAINSCOAT R.J. and WATERS C.

Abstract (from CDS):

Efficient identification and follow-up of astronomical transients is hindered by the need for humans to manually select promising candidates from data streams that contain many false positives. These artefacts arise in the difference images that are produced by most major ground-based time-domain surveys with large format CCD cameras. This dependence on humans to reject bogus detections is unsustainable for next generation all-sky surveys and significant effort is now being invested to solve the problem computationally. In this paper, we explore a simple machine learning approach to real-bogus classification by constructing a training set from the image data of ∼ 32 000 real astrophysical transients and bogus detections from the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. We derive our feature representation from the pixel intensity values of a 20x20 pixel stamp around the centre of the candidates. This differs from previous work in that it works directly on the pixels rather than catalogued domain knowledge for feature design or selection. Three machine learning algorithms are trained (artificial neural networks, support vector machines and random forests) and their performances are tested on a held-out subset of 25 percent of the training data. We find the best results from the random forest classifier and demonstrate that by accepting a false positive rate of 1 percent, the classifier initially suggests a missed detection rate of around 10 percent. However, we also find that a combination of bright star variability, nuclear transients and uncertainty in human labelling means that our best estimate of the missed detection rate is approximately 6 percent.

Abstract Copyright: © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society (2015)

Journal keyword(s): methods: data analysis - methods: statistical - techniques: image processing - surveys - supernovae: general

Status at CDS : All or part of tables of objects will not be ingested in SIMBAD.

Simbad objects: 7

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2015MNRAS.449..451W and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu