SIMBAD references

2020ApJ...889...52P - Astrophys. J., 889, 52-52 (2020/January-3)

Reality or mirage? Observational test and implications for the claimed extremely magnified quasar at z=6.3.

PACUCCI F. and LOEB A.

Abstract (from CDS):

In the last two decades, approximately 200 quasars have been discovered at z> 6, hosting active supermassive black holes with masses M•≳109M☉. While these sources reflect only the tip of the iceberg of the black hole mass distribution, their detection challenges standard growth models. The most massive z> 6 black hole that was inferred thus far (J0100+2802, M•~1.2×1010M☉) was recently claimed to be lensed, with a magnification factor µ=450. Here, we perform a consistency check of this claim, finding that the detection of such a source requires a bright-end slope β≥ 3.7 for the intrinsic quasar luminosity function (LF), Φ(L)∝L^-β^. Commonly used values of β∼2.8 are rejected at > 3σ . If the claim is confirmed, it is very unlikely that all the remaining 51 sources in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey sample are not magnified. Furthermore, it suffices that ≳25 % of the remaining sources are lensed for the intrinsic LF to differ significantly (i.e., > 3σ ) from the observed one. The presence of additional extremely magnified sources in the sample would lower the requirement to ∼4 % . Our results urge the community to perform more extended multiwavelength searches targeting z> 6 lensed quasars, also among known samples. This effort could vitally contribute to solving the open problem of the growth of the brightest z∼7 quasars.

Abstract Copyright: © 2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Journal keyword(s): Active galaxies - Supermassive black holes - Early universe - Reionization - Quasars - Strong gravitational lensing - Luminosity function

Simbad objects: 1

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2020ApJ...889...52P and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu