2020MNRAS.499.4666F -
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 499, 4666-4686 (2020/December-3)
Systematic errors in dust mass determinations: insights from laboratory opacity measurements.
FANCIULLO L., KEMPER F., SCICLUNA P., DHARMAWARDENA T.E. and SRINIVASAN S.
Abstract (from CDS):
The thermal emission of dust is one of the most important tracers of the interstellar medium: multiwavelength photometry in the far-infrared (FIR) and submillimetre (submm) can be fitted with a model, providing estimates of the dust mass. The fit results depend on the assumed value for FIR/submm opacity, which in most models - due to the scarcity, until recently, of experimental measurements - is extrapolated from shorter wavelengths. Lab measurements of dust analogues, however, show that FIR opacities are usually higher than the values used in models and depend on temperature, which suggests that dust mass estimates may be biased. To test the extent of this bias, we create multiwavelength synthetic photometry for dusty galaxies at different temperatures and redshifts, using experimental results for FIR/submm dust opacity and then we fit the synthetic data using standard dust models. We find that the dust masses recovered by typical models are overestimated by a factor of 2-20, depending on how the experimental opacities are treated. If the experimental dust samples are accurate analogues of interstellar dust, therefore, current dust masses are overestimated by up to a factor of 20. The implications for our understanding of dust, both Galactic and at high redshift, are discussed.
Abstract Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society
Journal keyword(s):
galaxies: ISM - dust, extinction - submillimetre: galaxies - submillimetre: ISM
Simbad objects:
6
Full paper
View the references in ADS
To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:2020MNRAS.499.4666F and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu