SN 2016eay , the SIMBAD biblio

SN 2016eay , the SIMBAD biblio (83 results) C.D.S. - SIMBAD4 rel 1.8 - 2026.10.15CEST11:21:40

Sort references on where and how often the object is cited
trying to find the most relevant references on this object.
More on score
Bibcode/DOI Score in Title|Abstract|
Keywords 		in a table in teXt, Caption, ... Nb occurence Nb objects in ref Citations
(from ADS) 		Title First 3 Authors
2017ApJ...835L...8N 2805 T K A     X C F     68 13 38 An ultraviolet excess in the superluminous supernova
Gaia16apd reveals a powerful central engine. 		NICHOLL M., BERGER E., MARGUTTI R., et al.
2016ATel.9071....1K 157 T         X         3 3 4 Spectroscopic classification of supernova
Gaia16apd with the Nordic Optical Telescope. 		KANGAS T., ELIAS-ROSA N., LUNDQVIST P., et al.
2017ApJ...839L...6S 343 T K A     X         8 3 7 The magnetar model of the superluminous supernova Gaia16apd and the explosion jet feedback mechanism. SOKER N.
2017ApJ...840...12Y 16       D               3 38 51 A statistical study of superluminous supernovae using the magnetar engine model and implications for their connection with gamma-ray bursts and hypernovae. YU Y.-W., ZHU J.-P., LI S.-Z., et al.
2017ApJ...840...57Y 3837 T K A S   X C       94 22 38 Far-ultraviolet to near-infrared spectroscopy of a nearby hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova
Gaia16apd. 		YAN L., QUIMBY R., GAL-YAM A., et al.
2017ApJ...842...26L 214       D     X C       5 26 23 A Monte Carlo approach to magnetar-powered transients. I. Hydrogen-deficient superluminous supernovae. LIU L.-D., WANG S.-Q., WANG L.-J., et al.
2017MNRAS.466.2633S 41           X         1 13 44 Supernova ejecta with a relativistic wind from a central compact object: a unified picture for extraordinary supernovae. SUZUKI A. and MAEDA K.
2017MNRAS.469.1246K 2543 T K A D     X C       63 13 36
Gaia16apd - a link between fast and slowly declining type I superluminous supernovae. 		KANGAS T., BLAGORODNOVA N., MATTILA S., et al.
2017ApJ...845L...2T 1374 T K A     X C       33 6 6 Ultraviolet light curves of
Gaia16apd in superluminous supernova models. 		TOLSTOV A., ZHIGLO A., NOMOTO K., et al.
2017ATel10498....1D 79           X         2 3 ~ Re-classification of Gaia17biu/SN 2017egm: the closest hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova yet found, located in a massive host galaxy. DONG S., CHEN P., BENETTI S., et al.
2017MNRAS.470.3566C 613   K   D     X C F     14 22 54 Superluminous supernova progenitors have a half-solar metallicity threshold. CHEN T.-W., SMARTT S.J., YATES R.M., et al.
2017ApJ...848....6Y 398           X C       9 23 91 Hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae with late-time Hα emission: three events from the intermediate Palomar Transient Factory. YAN L., LUNNAN R., PERLEY D.A., et al.
2017ApJ...850...55N 614       D     X C       15 41 176 The magnetar model for Type I superluminous supernovae. I. Bayesian analysis of the full multicolor light-curve sample with MOSFiT. NICHOLL M., GUILLOCHON J. and BERGER E.
2017ApJ...851...95S 16       D               1 24 24 Magnetar-powered superluminous supernovae must first be exploded by jets. SOKER N. and GILKIS A.
2018ApJ...852...81L viz 42           X         1 32 93 Hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae from the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. LUNNAN R., CHORNOCK R., BERGER E., et al.
2018ApJ...853...57B 724           X C       17 27 66 Gaia17biu/SN 2017egm in NGC 3191: the closest hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova to date is in a "normal," massive, metal-rich spiral galaxy. BOSE S., DONG S., PASTORELLO A., et al.
2018ApJ...854...37S 867     A     X C       21 13 12 Studying the ultraviolet spectrum of the first spectroscopically confirmed Supernova at redshift two. SMITH M., SULLIVAN M., NICHOL R.C., et al.
2018ApJ...854..175I 56       D     X         2 48 19 A statistical approach to identify superluminous supernovae and probe their diversity. INSERRA C., PRAJS S., GUTIERREZ C.P., et al.
2018ApJ...855....2Q 41           X         1 63 93 Spectra of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory. QUIMBY R.M., DE CIA A., GAL-YAM A., et al.
2018ApJ...856...56C 940       D     X C F     22 26 32 Jets in hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae: constraints from a comprehensive analysis of radio observations. COPPEJANS D.L., MARGUTTI R., GUIDORZI C., et al.
2016ATel.9074....1B 157 T         X         3 3 2 Swift/UVOT Observations for SLSN-I
Gaia16apd. 		BLAGORODNOVA N., YAN L., QUIMBY R., et al.
2018ApJ...858...91Y 1245   K A D     X C       31 9 10 Far-UV HST spectroscopy of an unusual hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova: SN2017egm. YAN L., PERLEY D.A., DE CIA A., et al.
2018ApJ...858..115A 37     A               1 5 65 Related progenitor models for long-duration gamma-ray bursts and Type Ic superluminous supernovae. AGUILERA-DENA D.R., LANGER N., MORIYA T.J., et al.
2018MNRAS.478..110S 361           X C       8 16 6 Broad-band emission properties of central engine-powered supernova ejecta interacting with a circumstellar medium. SUZUKI A. and MAEDA K.
2016ATel.9158....1S 118 T         X         2 1 ~ TLS Tautenburg observations of the SLSN Gaia 16apd. SCHMIDL S., MERSCH R., KANN D.A., et al.
2018ApJ...864...45M viz 41           X         1 37 58 Results from a systematic survey of X-ray emission from hydrogen-poor superluminous SNe. MARGUTTI R., CHORNOCK R., METZGER B.D., et al.
2018ApJ...865....9B 281           X C       6 18 9 The Type I superluminous supernova PS16aqv: lightcurve complexity and deep limits on radioactive ejecta in a fast event. BLANCHARD P.K., NICHOLL M., BERGER E., et al.
2018NatAs...2..887L 1 14 14 A UV resonance line echo from a shell around a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova. LUNNAN R., FRANSSON C., VREESWIJK P.M., et al.
2018ApJ...867..113M 16       D               2 37 11 Systematic investigation of the fallback accretion-powered model for hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae. MORIYA T.J., NICHOLL M. and GUILLOCHON J.
2018ApJ...869..166V 16       D               1 58 6 Superluminous supernovae in LSST: rates, detection metrics, and light-curve modeling. VILLAR V.A., NICHOLL M. and BERGER E.
2018A&A...620A..67A 402           X C       9 25 36 A nearby super-luminous supernova with a long pre-maximum & "plateau" and strong C II features. ANDERSON J.P., PESSI P.J., DESSART L., et al.
2019ApJ...871..102N 652   K A D S   X C       15 20 55 Nebular-phase spectra of superluminous supernovae: physical insights from observational and statistical properties. NICHOLL M., BERGER E., BLANCHARD P.K., et al.
2019A&A...621A.141D 595     A     X C       14 16 33 Simulations of light curves and spectra for superluminous Type Ic supernovae powered by magnetars. DESSART L.
2019MNRAS.484.3443M 41           X         1 7 1 Synthetic spectra of energetic core-collapse supernovae and the early spectra of SN 2007bi and SN 1999as. MORIYA T.J., MAZZALI P.A. and TANAKA M.
2019RAA....19...63W 41           X         1 28 3 The Energy Sources of Superluminous Supernovae. WANG S.-Q., WANG L.-J. and DAI Z.-G.
2019ApJS..241...16M 42           X         1 16 16 First release of high-redshift superluminous supernovae from the Subaru HIgh-Z SUpernova CAmpaign (SHIZUCA). I. Photometric properties. MORIYA T.J., TANAKA M., YASUDA N., et al.
2019ApJS..241...17C 42           X         1 11 11 First release of high-redshift superluminous supernovae from the Subaru HIgh-Z SUpernova CAmpaign (SHIZUCA). II. Spectroscopic properties. CURTIN C., COOKE J., MORIYA T.J., et al.
2019ApJ...882..102G 406           X C       9 11 ~ A simple analysis of Type I superluminous supernova peak spectra: composition, expansion velocities, and dynamics. GAL-YAM A.
2018ATel11790....1B 120           X         3 4 ~ UV Spectroscopy of the Superluminous Supernova SN2018bsz. BLANCHARD P., NICHOLL M., CHORNOCK R., et al.
2020A&A...634A.107Y 16       D               2 144 39 Present-day mass-metallicity relation for galaxies using a new electron temperature method. YATES R.M., SCHADY P., CHEN T.-W., et al.
2020MNRAS.493.3264K viz 41           X         1 22 ~ Electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave events from Gaia. KOSTRZEWA-RUTKOWSKA Z., JONKER P.G., HODGKIN S.T., et al.
2020ApJ...892...28K 469       D     X C       11 20 ~ SN 2010kd: photometric and spectroscopic analysis of a slow-decaying superluminous supernova. KUMAR A., PANDEY S.B., KONYVES-TOTH R., et al.
2020ApJ...897..114B 16       D               1 67 ~ The pre-explosion mass distribution of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova progenitors and new evidence for a mass-spin correlation. BLANCHARD P.K., BERGER E., NICHOLL M., et al.
2020MNRAS.497..318L 329           X C F     6 15 ~ SN 2018hti: a nearby superluminous supernova discovered in a metal-poor galaxy. LIN W.L., WANG X.F., LI W.X., et al.
2020ApJ...900...46Y viz 166           X C       3 33 40 SN2019dge: a helium-rich ultra-stripped envelope supernova. YAO Y., DE K., KASLIWAL M.M., et al.
2020ApJ...904...74G 16       D               1 145 ~ FLEET: a redshift-agnostic machine learning pipeline to rapidly identify hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae. GOMEZ S., BERGER E., BLANCHARD P.K., et al.
2021MNRAS.500.5142F 17       D               1 113 29 From core collapse to superluminous: the rates of massive stellar explosions from the Palomar Transient Factory. FROHMAIER C., ANGUS C.R., VINCENZI M., et al.
2021ApJ...909...24K 226       D     X         6 93 ~ Photospheric velocity gradients and ejecta masses of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae: proxies for distinguishing between fast and slow events. KONYVES-TOTH R. and VINKO J.
2021MNRAS.502.1678K 861     A     X C       20 51 12 SN 2020ank: a bright and fast-evolving H-deficient superluminous supernova. KUMAR A., KUMAR B., PANDEY S.B., et al.
2021MNRAS.502.2120F 125           X C       2 23 16 SN 2017gci: a nearby Type I Superluminous Supernova with a bumpy tail. FIORE A., CHEN T.-W., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2021ApJ...908..217S 43           X         1 13 14 Two-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of supernova ejecta with a central power source. SUZUKI A. and MAEDA K.
2021ApJ...908..249M 209           X C       4 8 ~ Constraints on the rate of supernovae lasting for more than a year from Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam. MORIYA T.J., JIANG J.-A., YASUDA N., et al.
2021ApJ...912...21E 17       D               1 125 18 Late-time radio and millimeter observations of superluminous supernovae and long gamma-ray bursts: implications for central engines, fast radio bursts, and obscured star formation. EFTEKHARI T., MARGALIT B., OMAND C.M.B., et al.
2021MNRAS.504.2535I 17       D               1 31 24 The first Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous supernovae. INSERRA C., SULLIVAN M., ANGUS C.R., et al.
2021ApJ...917....9H 444     A     X C       10 15 18 Discovery of a fast iron low-ionization outflow in the early evolution of the nearby tidal disruption event AT 2019qiz. HUNG T., FOLEY R.J., VEILLEUX S., et al.
2021ApJ...917...97W viz 84             C       1 27 3 ASASSN-14ms: the most energetic known explosion of a Type Ibn supernova and its physical origin. WANG X., LIN W., ZHANG J., et al.
2021A&A...652A..76H viz 42           X         1 851 49 Gaia Early Data Release 3. Gaia photometric science alerts. HODGKIN S.T., HARRISON D.L., BREEDT E., et al.
2021MNRAS.507.1229P 84               F     1 39 18 Photometric, polarimetric, and spectroscopic studies of the luminous, slow-decaying Type Ib SN 2012au. PANDEY S.B., KUMAR A., KUMAR B., et al.
2022MNRAS.512.2489O 51           X         1 2 17 Magnetorotational core collapse of possible gamma-ray burst progenitors - IV. A wider range of progenitors. OBERGAULINGER M. and ALOY M.A.
2022MNRAS.512.4484F 596           X C F     12 24 4 Close, bright, and boxy: the superluminous SN 2018hti. FIORE A., BENETTI S., NICHOLL M., et al.
2022MNRAS.513.4057S 230       D     X   F     5 32 8 A mid-infrared study of superluminous supernovae. SUN L., XIAO L. and LI G.
2022ApJ...931...32Y viz 213           X C       4 4 ~ Optical Observations and Modeling of the Superluminous Supernova 2018lfe. YIN Y., GOMEZ S., BERGER E., et al.
2022ApJ...931..153S 17       D               1 84 5 Constraints on the Explosion Timescale of Core-collapse Supernovae Based on Systematic Analysis of Light Curves. SAITO S., TANAKA M., SAWADA R., et al.
2022MNRAS.514.5686P 145       D     X         4 87 9 Oxygen and calcium nebular emission line relationships in core-collapse supernovae and Ca-rich transients. PRENTICE S.J., MAGUIRE K., SIEBENALER L., et al.
2022ApJ...937...40K 43           X         1 22 4 Ultraviolet Spectroscopy and TARDIS Models of the Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova 2014ad. KWOK L.A., WILLIAMSON M., JHA S.W., et al.
2022MNRAS.517.2056G 85           X         2 30 9 SN 2020wnt: a slow-evolving carbon-rich superluminous supernova with no O II lines and a bumpy light curve. GUTIERREZ C.P., PASTORELLO A., BERSTEN M., et al.
2022ApJ...940...69K 102       D     X         3 32 2 Premaximum Spectroscopic Diversity of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae. KONYVES-TOTH R.
2022ApJ...941..107G 43           X         1 238 16 Luminous Supernovae: Unveiling a Population between Superluminous and Normal Core-collapse Supernovae. GOMEZ S., BERGER E., NICHOLL M., et al.
2023MNRAS.521.2814K 871           X C F     18 24 1 The rest-frame ultraviolet of superluminous supernovae - I. Potential as cosmological probes. KHETAN N., COOKE J. and BRANCHESI M.
2023ApJ...949...23Z viz 305           X C       6 17 2 SN 2017egm: A Helium-rich Superluminous Supernova with Multiple Bumps in the Light Curves. ZHU J., JIANG N., DONG S., et al.
2023ApJ...951...34T 44           X         1 19 3 Supernova 2020wnt: An Atypical Superluminous Supernova with a Hidden Central Engine. TINYANONT S., WOOSLEY S.E., TAGGART K., et al.
2023ApJ...951..134P viz 87             C       1 15 5 Chandra, HST/STIS, NICER, Swift, and TESS Detail the Flare Evolution of the Repeating Nuclear Transient ASASSN -14ko. PAYNE A.V., AUCHETTL K., SHAPPEE B.J., et al.
2023ApJ...954...44K 61       D     X         2 29 ~ Type W and Type 15bn Subgroups of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae: Premaximum Diversity, Postmaximum Homogeneity? KONYVES-TOTH R. and SELI B.
2023MNRAS.526.1822K 104       D         F     2 31 ~ Reduction of supernova light curves by vector Gaussian processes. KORNILOV M.V., SEMENIKHIN T.A. and PRUZHINSKAYA M.V.
2024MNRAS.527.6473F 90               F     1 37 ~ Detailed spectrophotometric analysis of the superluminous and fast evolving SN 2019neq. FIORE A., BENETTI S., TARTAGLIA L., et al.
2024MNRAS.52711970A 90               F     1 32 ~ A precursor plateau and pre-maximum [O II] emission in the superluminous SN2019szu: a pulsational pair-instability candidate. AAMER A., NICHOLL M., JERKSTRAND A., et al.
2024ApJ...961..169H 152       D     X         4 110 ~ An Extensive Hubble Space Telescope Study of the Offset and Host Light Distributions of Type I Superluminous Supernovae. HSU B., BLANCHARD P.K., BERGER E., et al.
2024A&A...683A.223S viz 45           X         1 28 ~ 1100 days in the life of the supernova 2018ibb The best pair-instability supernova candidate, to date. SCHULZE S., FRANSSON C., KOZYREVA A., et al.
2024A&A...685A..20G 224           X   F     4 24 ~ SN 2020zbf: A fast-rising hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with strong carbon lines. GKINI A., LUNNAN R., SCHULZE S., et al.
2024MNRAS.535..471G 287       D S   X         6 274 ~ The Type I superluminous supernova catalogue I: light-curve properties, models, and catalogue description. GOMEZ S., NICHOLL M., BERGER E., et al.
2025ApJS..281...28M 93           X         2 64 ~ The Hawaii Infrared Supernova Study (HISS): Spectroscopic Data Release 1. MEDLER K., ASHALL C., SHAHBANDEH M., et al.
2025ApJ...995L..17J 327           X C       6 9 ~ Discovery of SN 2025wny: A Strongly Gravitationally Lensed Superluminous Supernova at z = 2.01. JOHANSSON J., PERLEY D.A., GOOBAR A., et al.
2025MNRAS.544.3799O 140           X         3 5 ~ OpenUniverse2024: a shared, simulated view of the sky for the next generation of cosmological surveys. OPENUNIVERSE, THE LSST DARK ENERGY SCIENCE COLLABORATION, THE ROMAN HLIS PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE, et al.

goto View the references in ADS