2000AJ....119.1645T


Query : 2000AJ....119.1645T

2000AJ....119.1645T - Astron. J., 119, 1645-1676 (2000/April-0)

The stellar population histories of local early-type galaxies. I. Population parameters.

TRAGER S.C., FABER S.M., WORTHEY G. and GONZALEZ J.J.

Abstract (from CDS):

This paper commences a series of investigations into the stellar populations of local elliptical galaxies as determined from their integrated spectra. The goal of the series is to determine the star formation and chemical evolution histories of present-day elliptical galaxies. The primary galaxy sample analyzed is that of González, which consists of 39 elliptical galaxies drawn primarily from the local field and nearby groups, plus the bulge of Messier 31. Single-burst stellar population (SSP)-equivalent ages, metallicities, and abundance ratios are derived from Hβ, Mg b, and <Fe> line strengths using an extension of the Worthey models that incorporates nonsolar line-strength ``response functions'' by Tripicco & Bell. These functions account for changes in the Lick/IDS indices caused by nonsolar abundance ratios, allowing us to correct the Worthey models for the enhancements of Mg and other α-like elements relative to the Fe-peak elements.

SSP-equivalent ages of the González elliptical galaxies are found to vary widely, 1.5 Gyr≲t≲18 Gyr, while metallicities [Z/H] and enhancement ratios [E/Fe] are strongly peaked around <[Z/H]>=+0.26 and <[E/Fe]>=+0.20 (in an aperture of radius re/8). The enhancement ratios [E/Fe] are milder than previous estimates because of the application of nonsolar abundance corrections to both Mg b and <Fe> for the first time. While [E/Fe] is usually greater than zero, it is not the ``E'' elements that are actually enhanced but rather the Fe-peak elements that are depressed; this serves not only to weaken <Fe> but also to strengthen Mg b, accounting for the overall generally mild enhancements. Based on index strengths from the Lick/IDS galaxy library (Trager et al.), C is not depressed with Fe but rather seems to be on a par with other elements such as Mg in the E group. Gradients in stellar populations within galaxies are found to be mild, with SSP-equivalent age increasing by 25%, metallicity decreasing by <[Z/H]>=0.20 dex, and [E/Fe] remaining nearly constant out to an aperture of radius re/2 for nearly all systems.

Our ages have an overall zero-point uncertainty of at least ∼25% because of uncertainties in the stellar evolution prescription, the oxygen abundance, the effect of [E/Fe]≠0 on the isochrones, and other unknowns. However, the relative age rankings of stellar populations should be largely unaffected by these errors. In particular, the large spread in ages appears to be real and cannot be explained by contamination of Hβ by blue stragglers or hot horizontal-branch stars, or by fill-in of Hβ by emission. Correlations between these derived SSP-equivalent parameters and other galaxy observables will be discussed in future papers.


Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): Galaxies: Abundances - Galaxies: Elliptical and Lenticular, cD - Galaxies: Evolution - galaxies: stellar content

Simbad objects: 49

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 49
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 32 GiG 00 42 41.82480 +40 51 54.6120 9.51 9.03 8.08     ~ 2236 2
2 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
3 NGC 315 LIN 00 57 48.88334410 +30 21 08.8119345 12.80 12.20 11.16 11.26   ~ 869 2
4 NGC 507 rG 01 23 39.950 +33 15 22.22   13.0       ~ 459 1
5 NGC 547 rG 01 26 00.6208982520 -01 20 42.432452268   13.16 13.34     ~ 363 4
6 NGC 584 Sy2 01 31 20.7231919800 -06 52 04.770287472 11.93 11.44 10.48     ~ 417 2
7 NGC 636 EmG 01 39 06.5293238064 -07 30 45.475975296   12.5       ~ 196 0
8 BAX 028.2522-13.7387 ClG 01 53 00.40 -13 44 18.0           ~ 389 0
9 NGC 720 Sy1 01 53 00.523 -13 44 19.25   12.4   10.36   ~ 536 0
10 NGC 821 AG? 02 08 21.1358498040 +10 59 41.832436704   12.210 11.310 10.739 9.744 ~ 592 0
11 NGC 1453 EmG 03 46 27.2307890592 -03 58 07.831476768   13   11.30   ~ 189 0
12 NGC 1600 rG 04 31 39.858 -05 05 09.97   8.9   10.81   ~ 409 1
13 NGC 1700 EmG 04 56 56.3160873072 -04 51 56.794713228   12   11.14   ~ 356 1
14 NGC 2329 rG 07 09 08.0049393360 +48 36 55.726108020   13.7 13.99     ~ 143 3
15 ACO 569 ClG 07 09 10.4 +48 37 10           ~ 172 1
16 NGC 2300 AG? 07 32 20.486 +85 42 31.90   12.2       ~ 346 0
17 NGC 2778 GiP 09 12 24.3741783168 +35 01 39.140496840   13.1       ~ 303 0
18 NGC 3377 GiP 10 47 42.400 +13 59 08.30 11.55 11.24 10.38     ~ 798 1
19 M 105 LIN 10 47 49.600 +12 34 53.87   10.56 9.76 9.12 8.18 ~ 1504 0
20 NGC 3608 LIN 11 16 58.967 +18 08 54.71   11.7       ~ 527 0
21 NGC 3818 EmG 11 41 57.3563891040 -06 09 20.459153376   13   11.78   ~ 186 0
22 NGC 4261 LIN 12 19 23.2160630 +05 49 29.700024   13.92 12.87     ~ 1290 0
23 NGC 4278 LIN 12 20 06.8242 +29 16 50.722 11.54 11.09 10.16     ~ 988 2
24 M 84 Sy2 12 25 03.74333 +12 53 13.1393 12.67 12.09 10.49     ~ 1841 2
25 M 49 Sy2 12 29 46.8 +08 00 01   13.21 12.17     ~ 2174 2
26 NGC 4478 GiP 12 30 17.4160005576 +12 19 42.790577160 12.82 12.36 11.45   10.17 ~ 508 1
27 NGC 4489 GiG 12 30 52.2472748976 +16 45 31.866359004   13.2       ~ 264 0
28 M 89 Sy2 12 35 39.80733343 +12 33 22.8308657 11.29 10.73 9.75     ~ 1037 2
29 M 60 GiC 12 43 39.9708251934 +11 33 09.688174067   10.3       ~ 1395 1
30 NGC 4697 GiG 12 48 35.8981498824 -05 48 02.482374564   10.97   9.83   ~ 895 0
31 NGC 5638 GiP 14 29 40.3717451400 +03 13 59.987811648 12.57 12.14 11.20     ~ 252 2
32 NGC 5812 EmG 15 00 55.708 -07 27 26.33   12   11.19   ~ 164 0
33 NGC 5813 LIN 15 01 11.2302420864 +01 42 07.141569696 12.00 11.45 10.46 10.06   ~ 673 2
34 NGC 5831 GiG 15 04 07.0002600408 +01 13 11.705607012   13.1   11.19   ~ 304 0
35 NGC 5846 rG 15 06 29.253 +01 36 20.29   11.9   9.74   ~ 891 2
36 NGC 6125 AG? 16 19 11.5344941208 +57 59 02.863041504   13.0       ~ 106 0
37 NGC 6388 GlC 17 36 17.461 -44 44 08.34           ~ 988 1
38 NGC 6441 GlC 17 50 13.06 -37 03 05.2           ~ 940 0
39 NGC 6702 AG? 18 46 57.5835209136 +45 42 20.305242180 15.30 14.73 13.05     ~ 148 0
40 NGC 6703 AG? 18 47 18.8166660360 +45 33 02.274865812   12.29 11.34     ~ 225 0
41 NGC 6791 OpC 19 20 52.8 +37 46 40   10.52 9.5     ~ 1120 0
42 NGC 7052 rG 21 18 33.0441963648 +26 26 49.174586196 15.52 14.85 13.09     ~ 348 1
43 NGC 7454 GiG 23 01 06.5120307216 +16 23 18.484008792   13.6       ~ 157 0
44 NGC 7562 GiP 23 15 57.4982037648 +06 41 15.227839176   13.0       ~ 173 0
45 NGC 7619 GiG 23 20 14.524 +08 12 22.63   12.7       ~ 472 0
46 NGC 7626 rG 23 20 42.524 +08 13 01.43   12.8       ~ 438 1
47 ACO 2634 ClG 23 38 18.4 +27 01 37           ~ 515 2
48 NGC 7720 Sy1 23 38 29.38324020 +27 01 53.2580084   13.9 13.3     ~ 565 4
49 NGC 7785 AG? 23 55 19.0388560224 +05 54 56.735224164   13.00       ~ 179 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2000AJ....119.1645T and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu