2002AJ....124.1886M


Query : 2002AJ....124.1886M

2002AJ....124.1886M - Astron. J., 124, 1886-1904 (2002/October-0)

Color gradients and surface brightness profiles of galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field-North.

MOTH P. and ELSTON R.J.

Abstract (from CDS):

We fit elliptical isophotes to the Hubble Deep Field North WFPC-2 and NICMOS data to study the rest-frame (UV218-U300)0color profiles and rest-frame B surface brightness profiles of 33 intermediate-redshift galaxies (0.5≤z≤1.2) with I814<25 and 50 high-redshift galaxies (2.0≤z≤3.5) with H160<27. From the weighted least-squares fit to the color profiles we find that at intermediate redshifts the galaxies possess negative color gradients [<Δ(UV218-U300)0/Δlogr>=-0.091±0.007 mag.dex–1], indicating a reddening toward the center of the profile similar to local samples, whereas at high redshifts the galaxies possess positive color gradients [<Δ(UV218-U300)0/Δlogr>=0.272±0.007 mag.dex–1], indicating that star formation is more centrally concentrated. Although the presence of dust can cause some reddening to occur toward the centers of the profiles seen at intermediate redshifts, it cannot explain the strong central blueing of light seen at high redshifts. Thus, we are witnessing a population of galaxies with strong positive color gradients at high redshifts that do not seem to exist in large numbers at lower redshifts. This indicates that star formation is more centrally concentrated in the distant galaxy sample, which differs from the prevalent mode of extended disk star formation that we observe in the local universe. Additionally, we find that it is critical to correct for point-spread function (PSF) effects when evaluating the surface brightness profiles since at small scale lengths and faint magnitudes, an r1/4 profile can be smoothed out substantially to become consistent with an exponential profile. After correcting for PSF effects, we find that at higher look-back time, the fraction of galaxies possessing exponential profiles have slightly decreased while the fraction of galaxies possessing r1/4 profiles have slightly increased. Our results also suggest a statistically insignificant increase in the fraction of peculiar or irregular galaxies. We compare our results with recent semianalytical models that treat galaxy formation and evolution following the cold dark matter hierarchical framework.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): Cosmology: Observations - Cosmology: Theory - Galaxies: Evolution - Galaxies: High-Redshift - Galaxies: Starburst

Simbad objects: 34

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 34
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 GOODS J123638.98+621220.1 G 12 36 38.9796 +62 12 20.080 24.65 23.6890 23.73 22.14 22.2439 ~ 28 0
2 GOODS J123640.02+621207.7 G 12 36 40.0179 +62 12 07.703 25.22 24.7294 24.18 22.75 22.4290 ~ 29 0
3 [T2003] 124 G 12 36 41.59 +62 11 56.8           ~ 3 0
4 GOODS J123642.04+621321.7 G 12 36 42.0357 +62 13 21.697 24.48 24.7875 25.02 23.95 23.9231 ~ 18 0
5 Cowie 12 G 12 36 43.173 +62 12 42.19 26.88 25.6702 24.06 22.34 21.8838 ~ 46 0
6 Cowie 20 G 12 36 43.1967 +62 11 48.301 25.41 25.0878 24.69 23.10 22.6274 ~ 39 0
7 TKRS 7437 EmG 12 36 43.4180 +62 11 51.874 23.86 23.4772 23.77 23.00 23.1196 ~ 33 0
8 Cowie 58 G 12 36 43.6342 +62 12 18.614 24.60 24.0479 23.99 22.56 22.7387 ~ 37 0
9 [WBD96] 4-221.0 G 12 36 46.33 +62 12 46.8           ~ 2 0
10 SDSS J123646.31+621404.6 Sy1 12 36 46.332 +62 14 05.01 24.58 23.8730 23.174 21.69 21.5709 ~ 114 0
11 [WBD96] 4-132.0 G 12 36 46.94 +62 12 51.9           ~ 2 0
12 Cowie 60 G 12 36 47.1716 +62 14 14.592 25.23 25.9205 25.09 23.92 23.6114 ~ 27 0
13 Cowie 136 G 12 36 47.5459 +62 12 53.006 25.10 25.0469 25.22 24.26 23.9563 ~ 26 0
14 [TSB2006] 55 G 12 36 48.189 +62 12 14.98   23.8 23.4   21.9 ~ 10 0
15 NAME Hubble Deep Field reg 12 36 49.5 +62 12 58           ~ 1967 1
16 Cowie 22 rG 12 36 49.51 +62 14 06.9 24.66 23.6237 23.50 21.95 21.8989 ~ 55 0
17 Cowie 13 G 12 36 50.2698 +62 12 46.136 25.73 24.7143 23.73 21.74 21.5523 ~ 29 0
18 Cowie 84 G 12 36 50.3457 +62 14 19.008 24.15 24.2315 24.85 23.41 23.2079 ~ 28 0
19 Cowie 10 G 12 36 51.80 +62 13 53.7 24.63 23.1740 22.974 21.08 21.2076 ~ 50 0
20 [WBD96] 2-402.0 G 12 36 51.81 +62 13 15.1           ~ 2 0
21 Cowie 70 G 12 36 51.9742 +62 14 01.204 24.83 24.6207 24.46 23.03 23.0532 ~ 22 0
22 [EAD2001] HDFN J123652.88+621404.8 IG 12 36 52.84 +62 14 04.8 25.2 25.1 24.6 23.45 23.3 ~ 20 0
23 Cowie 68 G 12 36 53.4460 +62 12 34.644 25.34 24.3291 24.15 22.78 22.8465 ~ 29 0
24 Cowie 87 G 12 36 53.6433 +62 14 18.005 24.90 24.9080 24.66 23.36 23.4235 ~ 28 0
25 Cowie 7 G 12 36 53.8929 +62 12 54.395 24.53 22.9664 22.995 20.95 20.9765 ~ 44 0
26 Cowie 46 G 12 36 54.0894 +62 13 54.725 24.87 23.9806 24.14 22.72 22.5140 ~ 39 0
27 GOODS J123655.49+621403.1 G 12 36 55.4931 +62 14 03.076 25.65 24.8928 24.91 23.08 23.0118 ~ 15 0
28 Cowie 57 G 12 36 55.5113 +62 13 53.766 23.33 23.4712 24.50 22.85 22.7486 ~ 35 0
29 SDSS J123655.55+621246.1 G 12 36 55.5652 +62 12 45.865 23.59 23.7372 23.94 23.08 22.0271 ~ 41 0
30 GOODS J123655.58+621400.3 EmG 12 36 55.5791 +62 14 00.282 24.8 25.2399 25.19 23.74 23.8411 ~ 25 0
31 [WBD96] 3-610.0 G 12 36 56.425 +62 12 41.19           ~ 2 0
32 Cowie 123 G 12 36 56.5755 +62 12 57.441     28.8   25.3 ~ 13 0
33 Cowie 40 G 12 36 56.7047 +62 12 52.607 24.5 23.3972 25.68 24.0 24.2118 ~ 22 0
34 [EAD2001] HDFN J123656.93+621258.2 G 12 36 56.92749 +62 12 58.2852           ~ 10 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2002AJ....124.1886M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu