2004MNRAS.347.1011A


Query : 2004MNRAS.347.1011A

2004MNRAS.347.1011A - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 347, 1011-1032 (2004/January-3)

The dispersion in the Cepheid period-luminosity relation and the consequences for the extragalactic distance scale.

ALLEN P.D. and SHANKS T.

Abstract (from CDS):

Using published Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Cepheid data from 25 galaxies, we have found a correlation between the dispersion in the Cepheid period-luminosity (P -L) relation and host galaxy metallicity, which is significant at the ~3σ level in the V band. In the I band the correlation is less significant, although the tighter intrinsic dispersion of the P -L relation in I may make it harder to detect such a correlation in the HST sample. One possibility is that low metallicity galaxies have smaller metallicity gradients than high metallicity galaxies; if the Cepheid P -L relation has a significant dependence on metallicity then this might explain the higher P -L dispersion in the higher metallicity galaxies. A second possibility is that the increased P -L dispersion is driven by metallicity dispersion but now due to a relation between metallicity and Cepheid colour rather than luminosity. A third possibility is that the increased P -L dispersion is caused by an increase in the width of the instability strip with metallicity.

Whatever the explanation, the high observed dispersions in the HST Cepheid P -L relations have the important consequence that the bias due to incompleteness in the P -L relation at faint magnitudes is more significant than previously thought. Using a maximum likelihood technique which takes into account the effect on the P -L relations of truncation by consistently defined magnitude completeness limits, we rederive the Cepheid distances to the 25 galaxies. In the case of the galaxies with the highest P -L dispersion at the largest distances, we find that the published distance modulus underestimates the true distance modulus by up to ~0.5 mag.

When both metallicity and magnitude incompleteness corrections are made, a scale error in the published Cepheid distances is seen in the sense that the published distance moduli are increasingly underestimated at larger distances. This results in the average distance modulus to the four galaxies in the Virgo cluster core increasing from (m -M)031.2±0.19 to (m -M)031.4±0.19 if the γVI-0.24 mag/dex metallicity correction of Kennicutt et al. is assumed. For the 18 HST galaxies with good Tully-Fisher (TF) distances and (m -M)0> 29.5 the Cepheid-TF distance modulus average residual increases from 0.44±0.09 to 0.63±0.1 mag with γVI-0.24. This indicates a significant scale error in TF distances, which reduces the previous Pierce & Tully TF estimate of H085±10 km/s/Mpc to H063±7 km/s/Mpc, assuming γVI-0.24 and a still uncertain Virgo infall model. Finally, for the eight HST galaxies with Type Ia supernovae (SNIa), the metallicity and incompleteness corrected Cepheid distances marginally suggest there may be a metallicity dependence of SNIa peak luminosity in the sense that metal-poor hosts have lower luminosity SNIa. Thus, SNIa Hubble diagram estimates of both H0and q0may therefore also require significant corrections for metallicity, once the exact sizes of the Cepheid metallicity corrections become better established.


Abstract Copyright: 2004 RAS

Journal keyword(s): supernovae: general - Cepheids - open clusters and associations: general - distance scale

Simbad objects: 36

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 36
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
2 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 12317 1
3 NGC 300 GiG 00 54 53.4465638304 -37 41 03.168402396 8.83 8.69 8.13 7.46   ~ 1614 2
4 IC 1613 GiC 01 04 48.4071 +02 07 10.185   10.42 10.01 9.77   ~ 1316 2
5 M 33 GiG 01 33 50.8965749232 +30 39 36.630403128 6.17 6.27 5.72     ~ 6226 1
6 NGC 925 H2G 02 27 16.913 +33 34 43.97   10.69 10.12 9.55   ~ 818 1
7 NGC 1326A AG? 03 25 08.50 -36 21 50.2   13.80   12.91 13.7 ~ 103 0
8 NGC 1365 Sy1 03 33 36.458 -36 08 26.37 10.48 10.08 9.63 8.79 9.7 ~ 1987 2
9 ACO S 373 ClG 03 38 29.4 -35 27 08           ~ 2029 0
10 NGC 1425 EmG 03 42 11.4831633240 -29 53 36.186684252   11.61   11.6 10.9 ~ 209 0
11 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
12 NGC 2090 GiG 05 47 01.8557074752 -34 15 01.679264784 12.17 11.70 11.20 10.43 11.0 ~ 206 1
13 NGC 2403 AGN 07 36 51.3381434280 +65 36 09.650825640 9.31 8.84 8.38 8.19   ~ 1887 1
14 NGC 2541 GiG 08 14 40.1160678912 +49 03 42.021679932 12.03 12.26 11.80     ~ 333 1
15 M 81 Sy2 09 55 33.1726556496 +69 03 55.062505368   7.89 6.94     ~ 4725 3
16 NGC 3109 AG? 10 03 06.877 -26 09 34.46 11.10 10.42 10.04 9.91   ~ 825 2
17 NGC 3198 EmG 10 19 54.990 +45 32 58.88 10.83 10.87 10.33     ~ 946 1
18 NGC 3319 SyG 10 39 09.533 +41 41 12.74   11.48 11.07     ~ 325 1
19 M 95 GiP 10 43 57.7313485800 +11 42 13.301191332 10.71 10.51 9.73 9.48   ~ 1238 2
20 M 96 GiP 10 46 45.744 +11 49 11.78 10.42 10.15 9.25 8.99   ~ 862 1
21 NGC 3621 Sy2 11 18 16.300 -32 48 45.36 10.10 9.44 9.56 8.07 10.1 ~ 661 3
22 M 66 AGN 11 20 15.0 +12 59 29 9.85 9.65 8.92     ~ 1509 4
23 M 100 AGN 12 22 54.9299993592 +15 49 20.296257960 10.04 10.05 9.35     ~ 1963 2
24 NGC 4414 GiC 12 26 27.1276893168 +31 13 24.626206488 11.12 10.96 10.12     ~ 593 2
25 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
26 NGC 4496 GiP 12 31 39.2222392512 +03 56 21.641352828   11.71       ~ 376 0
27 NGC 4535 H2G 12 34 20.3443516704 +08 11 51.908488116   11.1       ~ 679 0
28 NGC 4536 H2G 12 34 27.12887 +02 11 16.3680 11.14 11.16 10.55 17.393   ~ 913 3
29 M 91 LIN 12 35 26.4446761320 +14 29 46.760333748   14.63 13.57     ~ 639 0
30 NGC 4639 Sy1 12 42 52.3785000336 +13 15 26.706153600   13.62 12.72     ~ 642 0
31 NGC 4725 Sy2 12 50 26.5716367992 +25 30 02.733090588   13.45 12.44     ~ 727 2
32 IC 4182 BiC 13 05 48.7478324064 +37 36 12.965157684   11.86   11.40   ~ 344 1
33 NGC 5253 rG 13 39 55.990 -31 38 24.11 11.48 10.94 10.49 10.33 13.47 ~ 1421 4
34 M 101 GiP 14 03 12.583 +54 20 55.50   8.46 7.86 7.76   ~ 3138 2
35 NAME Ursa Major Cluster ClG 15 08.8 +67 07           ~ 424 1
36 NGC 7331 LIN 22 37 04.0506038088 +34 24 56.800076508 10.65 10.35 9.48     ~ 1284 2

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2004MNRAS.347.1011A and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu