2005MNRAS.359..874D


Query : 2005MNRAS.359..874D

2005MNRAS.359..874D - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 359, 874-894 (2005/May-3)

Systematic uncertainties in the analysis of star cluster parameters based on broad-band imaging observations.

DE GRIJS R., ANDERS P., LAMERS H.J.G.L.M., BASTIAN N., FRITZE-v.ALVENSLEBEN U., PARMENTIER G., SHARINA M.E. and YI S.

Abstract (from CDS):

High-resolution Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging observations of star cluster systems provide a very interesting and useful alternative to spectroscopic studies for stellar population analyses with 8-m class telescopes. Here, we assess the systematic uncertainties in (young) cluster age, mass and (to a lesser extent) extinction and metallicity determinations, based on broad-band imaging observations with the HST. Our aim here is to intercompare the results obtained using a variety of commonly used modelling techniques, specifically with respect to our own extensively tested multidimensional approach. Any significant differences among the resulting parameters are due to the details of the various, independently developed, modelling techniques used, rather than to the stellar population models themselves. Despite the model uncertainties and the selection effects inherent to most methods used, we find that the peaks in the relative age and mass distributions of a given young (≲109 yr) cluster system can be derived relatively robustly and consistently, to accuracies of σt≡Δ<log(age/yr)>≤ 0.35 and σM≡Δ<log(Mcl/M☉)>≤ 0.14, respectively, assuming Gaussian distributions in cluster ages and masses for reasons of simplicity. The peaks in the relative mass distributions can be obtained with a higher degree of confidence than those in the relative age distributions, as exemplified by the smaller spread among the peak values of the mass distributions derived. This implies that mass determinations are mostly insensitive to the approach adopted. We reiterate that as extensive a wavelength coverage as possible is required to obtain robust and internally consistent age and mass estimates for the individual objects, with reasonable uncertainties. Finally, we conclude that the actual filter systems used for the observations should be used for constructing model colours, instead of using conversion equations, to achieve more accurate derivations of ages and masses.

Abstract Copyright: 2005 RAS

Journal keyword(s): methods: data analysis - galaxies: spiral - galaxies: starburst - galaxies: star clusters

Nomenclature: Table 1: [DAL2005] G1-NN (Nos G1-01 to G1-17). Table 21: [DAL2005] G2-NN (Nos G2-01 to G2-20).

Simbad objects: 11

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 11
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 1569 rG 04 30 49.186 +64 50 52.52 11.72 11.86 11.03     ~ 1297 3
2 M 82 AGN 09 55 52.430 +69 40 46.93 9.61 9.30 8.41     ~ 6156 6
3 [OM78] B PoG 09 59.1 +69 27           ~ 35 0
4 NGC 3310 AGN 10 38 45.85707 +53 30 11.8940   12.45 12.15     ~ 809 1
5 NGC 3921 LIN 11 51 06.8803989360 +55 04 43.414457484   13.4 12.64     ~ 260 1
6 NGC 4038 EmG 12 01 53.002 -18 52 03.32   10.91   9.74 11.0 ~ 1364 1
7 NAME Antennae IG 12 01 53.170 -18 52 37.92           ~ 1749 0
8 NGC 4039 GiP 12 01 53.51 -18 53 10.3   11.08   9.77   ~ 1173 1
9 M 51 Sy2 13 29 52.698 +47 11 42.93   9.26 8.36 8.40   ~ 4565 4
10 NGC 6745 AG? 19 01 41.192 +40 44 37.34   13.3       ~ 81 1
11 NGC 7252 AGN 22 20 44.7748209648 -24 40 41.909518200 12.26 12.46 12.06 11.57   ~ 720 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2005MNRAS.359..874D and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu