2006AJ....131.2442M


Query : 2006AJ....131.2442M

2006AJ....131.2442M - Astron. J., 131, 2442-2451 (2006/May-0)

Spectroscopic metallicities for Fornax ultracompact dwarf galaxies, globular clusters, and nucleated dwarf elliptical galaxies.

MIESKE S., HILKER M., INFANTE L. and JORDAN A.

Abstract (from CDS):

Various formation channels for the puzzling ultracompact dwarf galaxies (UCDs) have been proposed in the last few years. To better judge some of the competing scenarios, we present spectroscopic [Fe/H] estimates for a sample of 26 compact objects in the central region of the Fornax Cluster, covering the magnitude range of UCDs and bright globular clusters (18 mag<V<21 mag or -13.4 mag<MV←10.4 mag). We find a break in the metallicity distribution of compact objects at MV≃-11 mag (≃3x106 M☉): for MV←11 mag the mean metallicity is [Fe/H]=-0.62±0.05 dex, 0.56±0.15 dex higher than the value of -1.18±0.15 dex found for MV>-11 mag. This metallicity break is accompanied by a change in the size-luminosity relation for compact objects, as deduced from Hubble Space Telescope imaging: for MV←11 mag, rhscales with luminosity, while for MV>-11 mag, r_h_is almost luminosity-independent. In our study we therefore assume a limiting absolute magnitude of MV=-11 mag between UCDs and globular clusters. The mean metallicity of five Fornax nucleated dwarf elliptical galaxy (dE,N) nuclei included in our study is about 0.8 dex lower than that of the UCDs, a difference significant at the 4.5 σ level. This difference is marginally higher than expected from a comparison of their (V-I) colors, indicating that UCDs are younger than or at most coeval to dE,N nuclei. Because of the large metallicity discrepancy between UCDs and nuclei, we disfavor the hypothesis that most of the Fornax UCDs are the remnant nuclei of tidally stripped dE,Ns. Our metallicity estimates for UCDs are closer to but slightly below those derived for young massive clusters (YMCs) of comparable masses. We therefore favor a scenario in which most UCDs in Fornax are successors of merged YMCs produced in the course of violent galaxy-galaxy mergers. It is noted that, in contrast, the properties of Virgo UCDs are more consistent with the stripping scenario, suggesting that different UCD formation channels may dominate in either cluster.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): Galaxies: Clusters: Individual: Name: Fornax - Galaxies: Dwarf - Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters - Galaxies: Nuclei - Galaxy: Globular Clusters: General

CDS comments: W3 in NGC 7252 = [WSL93] 3

Simbad objects: 39

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 39
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 32 GiG 00 42 41.82480 +40 51 54.6120 9.51 9.03 8.08     ~ 2236 2
2 2A 0251+413 ClG 02 54 26.6 +41 33 25           ~ 328 1
3 [SRH2010] 2 84 GlC 03 37 28.250 -35 21 23.11     20.57     ~ 8 0
4 [BAL2007] gc381.6 GlC 03 37 46.710 -35 34 42.60     20.81 20.39   ~ 6 0
5 FCOS 2-2100 GlC 03 38 00.168 -35 30 08.21     20.94 20.57   ~ 12 0
6 NAME UCD-FORS 32 Gl? 03 38 05.0504949024 -35 24 09.329119704   19.7 19.15   18.02 ~ 18 0
7 NAME UCD-FORS 81 GlC 03 38 06.3040671264 -35 28 58.550357136   18.85 19.31 18.80 18.18 ~ 39 1
8 NAME UCD-FORS 36 G 03 38 06.5041040184 -35 23 03.708523500     20.00   19 ~ 13 0
9 [DRG2004] 92:39 GlC 03 38 12.700 -35 28 57.41     20.66 20.27   ~ 23 0
10 FCOS 2-89 GlC 03 38 14.02 -35 29 43.0     20.87     ~ 4 0
11 NAME UCD-FORS 84 GlC 03 38 14.809 -35 33 39.59     20.77   19.88 ~ 14 0
12 NAME UCD31 GlC 03 38 16.5027178944 -35 26 19.561859520     20.60   19.65 ~ 23 0
13 [MHJ2008] F-8 GlC 03 38 23.2407296424 -35 20 00.607683768     20.09 19.59   ~ 14 0
14 FCOS 0-2069 Gl? 03 38 26.7138817992 -35 30 07.387998948     20.67     ~ 7 0
15 [MHJ2008] F-12 G 03 38 28.9789910448 -35 22 56.105739516     19.87     ~ 17 0
16 NGC 1399 rG 03 38 29.083 -35 27 02.67 11.05 9.74 9.59 8.12   ~ 1636 1
17 ACO S 373 ClG 03 38 29.4 -35 27 08           ~ 2029 0
18 FCOS 0-2032 GlC 03 38 30.22 -35 21 30.9     20.78     ~ 8 0
19 CXOU J033832.0-352812 GlC 03 38 32.061 -35 28 12.79     20.71     ~ 10 0
20 [JPB2015] 054.6481424-35.4543361 GlC 03 38 35.6761717776 -35 27 15.723866628     21.020   20.01 ~ 8 0
21 FCOS 1-58 GlC 03 38 39.342 -35 27 05.91     20.78     ~ 9 0
22 [MHJ2008] F-18 G 03 38 41.9519250336 -35 33 12.952421316     19.70     ~ 14 1
23 FCOS 0-2041 Gl? 03 38 44.11 -35 19 01.5     20.73     ~ 5 0
24 NAME UCD-FORS 4 GlC 03 38 49.140 -35 21 42.20     20.96 20.35 19.77 ~ 9 0
25 CGF 1-4 GlC 03 38 54.0545340024 -35 33 33.320376180   18.5 18.06     ~ 81 1
26 FCOS 0-2007 GlC 03 38 54.670 -35 29 44.40     20.54 20.15   ~ 7 0
27 [KGM99] aat 66 GlC 03 39 05.005 -35 26 53.47     20.96     ~ 7 0
28 FCOS 1-60 GlC 03 39 17.6834039208 -35 25 30.066435228   21.15 20.19 19.57   ~ 25 0
29 FCOS 3-2004 GlC 03 39 20.5202777400 -35 19 14.337162408     19.73 18.77   ~ 10 0
30 LEDA 2793608 GiC 03 39 35.9209845336 -35 28 24.441828204   18.82 19.12     ~ 44 1
31 NGC 4038 EmG 12 01 53.002 -18 52 03.32   10.91   9.74 11.0 ~ 1364 1
32 NAME Antennae IG 12 01 53.170 -18 52 37.92           ~ 1749 0
33 NGC 4039 GiP 12 01 53.51 -18 53 10.3   11.08   9.77   ~ 1173 1
34 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
35 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
36 ACO 1656 ClG 12 59 44.40 +27 54 44.9           ~ 5141 2
37 ACO 1689 ClG 13 11 29.5 -01 20 28           ~ 1178 0
38 [WSL93] 3 GlC 22 20 43.878 -24 40 37.87     17.86     ~ 53 0
39 NGC 7252 AGN 22 20 44.7748209648 -24 40 41.909518200 12.26 12.46 12.06 11.57   ~ 720 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2006AJ....131.2442M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu