2006MNRAS.366..295D


Query : 2006MNRAS.366..295D

2006MNRAS.366..295D - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 366, 295-307 (2006/February-2)

How well do we know the age and mass distributions of the star cluster system in the Large Magellanic Cloud?

DE GRIJS R. and ANDERS P.

Abstract (from CDS):

The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) star cluster system offers the unique opportunity to independently check the accuracy of age (and the corresponding mass) determinations based on a number of complementary techniques. Using our sophisticated tool for star cluster analysis based on broad-band spectral energy distributions (SEDs), `AnalySED', we re-analyse the Hunter et al. LMC cluster photometry. Our main aim is to set the tightest limits yet on the accuracy of absolute age determinations based on broad-band SEDs, and therefore on the usefulness of such an approach. Our broad-band SED fits yield reliable ages, with statistical absolute uncertainties within Δlog(Age/yr) ≃ 0.4 overall. The systematic differences we find with respect to previous age determinations are caused by conversions of the observational photometry to a different filter system, thus leading to systematically inaccurate results.

The LMC's cluster formation rate (CFR) has been roughly constant outside of the well-known age gap between ∼3 and 13Gyr, when the CFR was a factor of ∼5 lower. Using a simple approach to derive the characteristic cluster disruption time-scale, we find that log(tdis4/yr) = 9.9±0.1, where tdis=tdis4(Mcl/104M☉)0.62. This long characteristic disruption time-scale implies that we are observing the initial cluster mass function (CMF). We conclude that while the older cluster (sub)samples show CMF slopes that are fully consistent with the α≃-2 slopes generally observed in young star cluster systems, the youngest mass and luminosity-limited LMC cluster subsets show shallower slopes (at least below masses of a few x103M☉), which is contrary to dynamical expectations. This may imply that the initial CMF slope of the LMC cluster system as a whole is not well represented by a power law, although we cannot disentangle the unbound from the bound clusters at the youngest ages.


Abstract Copyright: 2005 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2005 RAS

Journal keyword(s): methods: data analysis - Magellanic Clouds - galaxies: star clusters - galaxies: stellar content

Simbad objects: 9

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 9
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 12317 1
2 NAME Magellanic Clouds GrG 03 00 -71.0           ~ 7988 0
3 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
4 M 82 AGN 09 55 52.430 +69 40 46.93 9.61 9.30 8.41     ~ 6156 6
5 [OM78] B PoG 09 59.1 +69 27           ~ 35 0
6 NGC 4038 EmG 12 01 53.002 -18 52 03.32   10.91   9.74 11.0 ~ 1364 1
7 NAME Antennae IG 12 01 53.170 -18 52 37.92           ~ 1749 0
8 NGC 4039 GiP 12 01 53.51 -18 53 10.3   11.08   9.77   ~ 1173 1
9 NAME Local Group GrG ~ ~           ~ 9325 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2006MNRAS.366..295D and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu