2007ApJ...656L..65D


Query : 2007ApJ...656L..65D

2007ApJ...656L..65D - Astrophys. J., 656, L65-L68 (2007/February-3)

Why haven't loose globular clusters collapsed yet?

DE MARCHI G., PARESCE F. and PULONE L.

Abstract (from CDS):

We report on the discovery of a surprising observed correlation between the slope of the low-mass stellar global mass function (GMF) of globular clusters (GCs) and their central concentration parameter c=log(rt/rc), i.e., the logarithmic ratio of tidal and core radii. This result is based on the analysis of a sample of 20 Galactic GCs with solid GMF measurements from deep HST or VLT data. All the high-concentration clusters in the sample have a steep GMF, most likely reflecting their initial mass function. Conversely, low-concentration clusters tend to have a flatter GMF, implying that they have lost many stars via evaporation or tidal stripping. No GCs are found with a flat GMF and high central concentration. This finding appears counterintuitive, since the same two-body relaxation mechanism that causes stars to evaporate and the cluster to eventually dissolve should also lead to higher central density and possibly core collapse. Therefore, more concentrated clusters should have lost proportionately more stars and have a shallower GMF than low-concentration clusters, contrary to what is observed. It is possible that severely depleted GCs have also undergone core collapse and have already recovered a normal radial density profile. It is, however, more likely that GCs with a flat GMF have a much denser and smaller core than that suggested by their surface brightness profile and may well be undergoing collapse at present. In either case, we may have so far seriously underestimated the number of post-core collapse clusters, and many may be lurking in the Milky Way.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): Galaxy: Globular Clusters: General - Stars: Luminosity Function, Mass Function

Simbad objects: 25

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 25
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 104 GlC 00 24 05.359 -72 04 53.20     4.09     ~ 4158 0
2 NGC 288 GlC 00 52 45.24 -26 34 57.4   10 8.13     ~ 1130 0
3 NGC 2298 GlC 06 48 59.41 -36 00 19.1     8.89     ~ 547 0
4 NGC 5139 GlC 13 26 47.28 -47 28 46.1           ~ 3677 0
5 M 3 GlC 13 42 11.62 +28 22 38.2     6.39     ~ 2593 0
6 Cl Pal 5 GlC 15 16 05.30 -00 06 41.0   15.1       ~ 797 1
7 M 4 GlC 16 23 35.22 -26 31 32.7           ~ 1978 0
8 M 12 GlC 16 47 14.18 -01 56 54.7     6.07     ~ 736 0
9 M 10 GlC 16 57 09.05 -04 06 01.1     4.98     ~ 857 0
10 M 92 GlC 17 17 07.39 +43 08 09.4     6.52     ~ 2240 0
11 NGC 6352 GlC 17 25 29.11 -48 25 19.8           ~ 425 0
12 ESO 454-29 GlC 17 27 33.24 -30 48 07.8           ~ 278 0
13 ESO 455-23 GlC 17 35 47.80 -30 28 11.0           ~ 285 0
14 NGC 6397 GlC 17 40 42.09 -53 40 27.6     5.17     ~ 2103 0
15 NGC 6496 GlC 17 59 03.68 -44 15 57.4   9.96       ~ 251 0
16 GCl 80.1 GlC 18 01 38.80 -26 50 23.0           ~ 143 0
17 NGC 6540 GlC 18 06 08.60 -27 45 55.0           ~ 145 0
18 M 22 GlC 18 36 23.94 -23 54 17.1           ~ 1459 0
19 NGC 6712 GlC 18 53 04.32 -08 42 21.5           ~ 550 0
20 NGC 6717 GlC 18 55 06.04 -22 42 05.3           ~ 273 0
21 NGC 6752 GlC 19 10 52.11 -59 59 04.4           ~ 2121 0
22 M 55 GlC 19 39 59.71 -30 57 53.1     6.49     ~ 913 0
23 M 71 GlC 19 53 46.49 +18 46 45.1           ~ 1190 0
24 M 15 GlC 21 29 58.33 +12 10 01.2           ~ 3274 0
25 M 30 GlC 21 40 22.12 -23 10 47.5     7.10     ~ 1121 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2007ApJ...656L..65D and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu