2008AJ....136..461E


Query : 2008AJ....136..461E

2008AJ....136..461E - Astron. J., 136, 461-478 (2008/July-0)

Structural properties of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies in the Fornax and Virgo clusters.

EVSTIGNEEVA E.A., DRINKWATER M.J., PENG C.Y., HILKER M., DE PROPRIS R., JONES J.B., PHILLIPPS S., GREGG M.D. and KARICK A.M.

Abstract (from CDS):

We present a detailed analysis of high-resolution two-band Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys imaging of 21 ultra-compact dwarf (UCD) galaxies in the Virgo and Fornax Clusters. The aim of this work is to test two formation hypotheses for UCDs–whether they are bright globular clusters (GCs) or stripped ("threshed") early-type dwarf galaxies–by direct comparison of UCD structural parameters and colors with GCs and galaxy nuclei. We find that the UCD surface brightness profiles can be described by a range of models and that the luminous UCDs in particular cannot be described by standard King models with tidal cutoffs as they have extended outer halos. This is not expected from traditional King models of GCs, but is consistent with recent results for massive GCs. The total luminosities, colors, and sizes of the UCDs (their position in the color-magnitude and luminosity-size diagrams) are consistent with them being either luminous GCs or threshed nuclei of both early-type and late-type galaxies (not just early-type dwarfs). For the most luminous UCDs we estimate color gradients over a limited range of radius. These are systematically positive in the sense of getting redder outward: mean Δ(F606W - F814W) = 0.14 mag per 100 pc with rms = 0.06 mag per 100 pc. The positive gradients found in the bright UCDs are consistent with them being either bright GCs or threshed early-type dwarf galaxies (except VUCD3). In contrast to the above results we find a very significant (>99.9% significance) difference in the sizes of UCDs and early-type galaxy nuclei: the effective radii of UCDs are 2.2+0.2–0.1 times larger than those of early-type galaxy nuclei at the same luminosity. This result suggests that an important test can be made of the threshing hypothesis by simulating the process and predicting what size increase is expected.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: clusters: individual (Fornax Cluster, Virgo Cluster) - galaxies: dwarf - galaxies: formation - galaxies: fundamental parameters - galaxies: star clusters - galaxies: structure

Nomenclature: Table 1: [DJG2000] UCO NN N=11 among (Nos 16-55) added.

Simbad objects: 41

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 41
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
2 [FDE2007] J033647.69-354834.0 GiC 03 36 47.7214495896 -35 48 33.690107268           ~ 7 0
3 [BAL2007] gc41.40 GlC 03 36 51.6531288048 -35 30 38.791905804           ~ 8 1
4 [BAL2007] uc257.5 GiC 03 37 03.2455003608 -35 38 04.385867820   19.85 19.31     ~ 34 1
5 [DJG2000] UCO 21 GiC 03 37 38.2528110048 -35 20 20.495414040           ~ 4 0
6 NAME UCD-FORS 32 Gl? 03 38 05.0504949024 -35 24 09.329119704   19.7 19.15   18.02 ~ 18 0
7 NAME UCD-FORS 81 GlC 03 38 06.3040671264 -35 28 58.550357136   18.85 19.31 18.80 18.18 ~ 39 1
8 [MHJ2008] F-7 GlC 03 38 17.5987243392 -35 33 02.482681212     20.49     ~ 20 0
9 [DJG2000] UCO 41 GiC 03 38 29.04 -35 22 56.5           ~ 3 0
10 NGC 1399 rG 03 38 29.083 -35 27 02.67 11.05 9.74 9.59 8.12   ~ 1636 1
11 ACO S 373 ClG 03 38 29.4 -35 27 08           ~ 2029 0
12 FCOS 1-58 GlC 03 38 39.342 -35 27 05.91     20.78     ~ 9 0
13 NGC 1404 rG 03 38 51.917 -35 35 39.81 11.53 10.69 10.00 9.03   ~ 787 1
14 CGF 1-4 GlC 03 38 54.0545340024 -35 33 33.320376180   18.5 18.06     ~ 81 1
15 FCOS 1-60 GlC 03 39 17.6834039208 -35 25 30.066435228   21.15 20.19 19.57   ~ 25 0
16 [DJG2000] UCO 50 GiC 03 39 34.7535949584 -35 53 44.232265572           ~ 6 0
17 LEDA 2793608 GiC 03 39 35.9209845336 -35 28 24.441828204   18.82 19.12     ~ 44 1
18 FCSS J033952.5-350424 GiC 03 39 52.5471040440 -35 04 24.003755616   19.66 19.50     ~ 37 0
19 [FDE2007] J034019.89-351530.0 GiC 03 40 19.8986194104 -35 15 29.666258424           ~ 5 0
20 [DJG2000] UCO 54 GiC 03 40 37.0672183176 -34 58 40.018687104           ~ 4 0
21 [DJG2000] UCO 55 GiC 03 41 35.8364941080 -35 54 57.810200976           ~ 4 0
22 NGC 1851 GlC 05 14 06.76 -40 02 47.6           ~ 1529 0
23 NAME HYA SUPERCL SCG 08 57.9 +03 10           ~ 204 0
24 NGC 2808 GlC 09 12 03.10 -64 51 48.6           ~ 1540 0
25 NAME Hydra I Cluster ClG 10 36 36.0 -27 31 04           ~ 905 1
26 NGC 3311 EmG 10 36 42.821 -27 31 42.02   11.93 10.93 10.00 9.67 ~ 310 2
27 M 49 Sy2 12 29 46.8 +08 00 01   13.21 12.17     ~ 2174 2
28 NGVS J123007.57+123631.0 GlC 12 30 07.5690151920 +12 36 30.997290168           ~ 27 0
29 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
30 NGVS J123048.19+123510.7 GlC 12 30 48.1979329680 +12 35 10.877368560           ~ 20 0
31 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
32 Hanes IV-67 G 12 30 57.3837738072 +12 25 44.498928792   19.32 17.97     ~ 54 0
33 NGVS J123104.48+115636.4 GlC 12 31 04.4756311440 +11 56 36.488582016           ~ 26 0
34 NGVS J123111.88+124101.1 GlC 12 31 11.8766309592 +12 41 01.083208776           ~ 30 0
35 NGVS J123128.36+122503.6 GlC 12 31 28.3629064464 +12 25 03.577545516           ~ 25 0
36 2MASS J12315289+1215589 G 12 31 52.8990925992 +12 15 59.041171656           ~ 52 0
37 NGVS J123204.35+122030.3 GlC 12 32 04.3487360568 +12 20 30.283469484           ~ 18 0
38 ACO 3526 ClG 12 48 49.2 -41 18 17           ~ 1154 2
39 ACO 1689 ClG 13 11 29.5 -01 20 28           ~ 1178 0
40 NAME Centaurus A BLL 13 25 27.61521044 -43 01 08.8050291   8.18 6.84 6.66   ~ 4774 3
41 NGC 5139 GlC 13 26 47.28 -47 28 46.1           ~ 3677 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2008AJ....136..461E and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu