2008MNRAS.383.1671T


Query : 2008MNRAS.383.1671T

2008MNRAS.383.1671T - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 383, 1671-1685 (2008/February-1)

Stochastic absorption of the light of background sources due to intergalactic neutral hydrogen - I. Testing different line-number evolution models via the cosmic flux decrement.

TEPPER-GARCIA T. and FRITZE U.

Abstract (from CDS):

We test the accuracy of different models of the attenuation of light due to resonant scattering by intergalactic neutral hydrogen by comparing their predictions of the evolution of the mean cosmic flux decrement, DA, to measurements of this quantity based on observations. To this end, we use data available in the literature and our own measurements of the cosmic flux decrement for 25 quasars in the redshift range 2.71 < zem< 5.41 taken from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 5. In order to perform the measurements of DA, we fit a power law to the continuum redward of the Lyα emission line, and extrapolate this fit to region blueward of it, where the flux is severely affected by absorption due to intervening HI absorbers.

We compute, using numerical simulations, the redshift evolution of DA accounting for the presence of Lyα forest absorbers and Lyman limit systems randomly distributed along the line-of-sight, and compute its intrinsic scatter at the 1σ, 2σ and 3σ level due to fluctuations in the absorber properties (column density, Doppler parameter, redshift) along different lines-of-sight. The numerical simulations consist of Monte Carlo realizations of distributions of the absorber properties constrained from observations.

The results from the models considered here confirm our theoretical expectation that the distribution of DA at any given redshift be well described by a lognormal distribution function. This implies that the effective optical depth, usually defined as the negative logarithm of the average flux, 1 - DA, is very accurately Gaussian distributed, in contrast to previous studies. This result is independent of the form of the input distribution functions, and rather insensitive to the presence of high column density absorbers, such as the Lyman limit systems.

By comparing our and previous measurements of DA to the outcomes of our simulations, we find an excellent agreement between the observations and the evolution of the mean DA as predicted by one of the models considered in this work. The observed scatter in DA at each redshift, however, cannot be recovered from our simulations. Even though there is evidence for the fact that the lack of agreement between models and observations comes from the combination of heterogeneous measurement sets obtained by different methods, the failure of the models to accurately account for the absorption by intergalactic Lyα absorbing systems and its variation along different lines-of-sight cannot be completely ruled out.


Abstract Copyright: 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 RAS

Journal keyword(s): methods: numerical - intergalactic medium - quasars: absorption lines

CDS comments: In Table 3 : SDSS J005006.35+005319.2 not identified.

Simbad objects: 25

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 25
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 QSO J0040-0915 BLL 00 40 54.6575670840 -09 15 26.833615164   26.46 22.40     ~ 59 0
2 QSO B0103+00 QSO 01 06 19.2392271120 +00 48 23.369353992   21.68 20.23     ~ 94 0
3 QSO J0140-0839 QSO 01 40 49.1830961952 -08 39 42.462483840   19.62 18.57     ~ 57 0
4 QSO J0231-0728 QSO 02 31 37.6463945454 -07 28 54.550661965   25.25 23.17     ~ 72 0
5 QSO J0756+4104 QSO 07 56 18.139 +41 04 08.61   25.29 23.32     ~ 57 0
6 QSO J0812+32 QSO 08 12 40.6859242632 +32 08 08.579336496   18.16 17.75     ~ 106 0
7 [VV2006] J083122.6+404623 QSO 08 31 22.5760969488 +40 46 23.417454036   24.03 21.99     ~ 37 0
8 [VV2006] J083914.1+485126 QSO 08 39 14.1524731704 +48 51 25.762988844   19.30 18.91     ~ 24 0
9 [VV2006] J085343.4+370402 QSO 08 53 43.3158429048 +37 04 02.451278100   20.19 19.73     ~ 26 0
10 [VV2006] J093523.3+411518 QSO 09 35 23.3232762432 +41 15 18.565026444   23.26 21.98     ~ 30 0
11 [VV2006] J094349.6+095400 QSO 09 43 49.6522122888 +09 54 00.968850432   21.45 20.16     ~ 28 0
12 QSO B1011+4315 QSO 10 14 47.1891688176 +43 00 30.167514324   17.39 17.05     ~ 74 0
13 [VV2006] J103601.0+500831 QSO 10 36 01.0318295712 +50 08 31.774330032   22.67 21.41     ~ 31 0
14 [VV2006] J112108.0+513005 QSO 11 21 08.0023640352 +51 30 05.354256636   20.58 19.82     ~ 29 0
15 QSO J1155+0530 QSO 11 55 38.6022229320 +05 30 50.687047944   19.57 18.78     ~ 59 0
16 NAME Hubble Deep Field reg 12 36 49.5 +62 12 58           ~ 1967 1
17 [VV2006] J124306.6+530522 QSO 12 43 06.5631620088 +53 05 22.081160256   19.54 18.93     ~ 33 0
18 [VV2006] J142124.0+463318 QSO 14 21 23.9850678432 +46 33 17.955577764   18.53 17.99     ~ 47 0
19 [VV2006] J144718.0+040112 QSO 14 47 17.9763937344 +04 01 12.398555748   22.33 21.25     ~ 34 0
20 [VV2006] J162331.2+481842 QSO 16 23 31.1488628616 +48 18 42.117768756   18.32 17.99     ~ 29 0
21 QSO J1626+2751 QSO 16 26 26.5027122120 +27 51 32.474301588   25.41 23.37     ~ 50 0
22 [VV2006] J163950.5+434004 QSO 16 39 50.5194357432 +43 40 03.701223408   19.59 18.67 17.8 17.4 ~ 45 1
23 [VV2006] J164219.9+445124 QSO 16 42 19.8842576544 +44 51 24.026479740   18.59 18.20     ~ 29 0
24 QSO B2332-094 QSO 23 34 46.4045250120 -09 08 12.250650732   19.21 18.62 18.07   ~ 89 1
25 [VV2006] J234150.0+144905 QSO 23 41 50.0177031000 +14 49 05.985120936   19.33 18.83     ~ 28 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2008MNRAS.383.1671T and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu