2009ApJ...699..254H


Query : 2009ApJ...699..254H

2009ApJ...699..254H - Astrophys. J., 699, 254-280 (2009/July-1)

Globular cluster systems in giant ellipticals: the Mass/Metallicity relation.

HARRIS W.E.

Abstract (from CDS):

Data from the Hubble Space Telescope taken with the Advanced Camera for Surveys/WFC camera have been used to investigate the globular cluster (GC) populations around six giant elliptical galaxies that are ∼40 Mpc distant. From these six fields, imaged in B and I, a total of more than 15,000 candidate GCs have been measured, of which 8000 or more are high-probability GCs. The data reach a limiting magnitude near MI≃ -8, about 0.4 mag fainter than the GC luminosity function turnover point, and thus thoroughly cover the bright half of the GC population. Most of the individual GCs on these images are marginally resolved nonstellar objects, so King-model profiles convolved with the stellar point-spread functions are used to measure their individual total magnitudes, colors, and linear effective radii. The classic bimodal form of the GC color-magnitude distribution shows up unambiguously in all the galaxies, allowing an accurate definition of the mean colors along each of the two sequences as a function of magnitude (the mass/metallicity relation or MMR). The blue, metal-poor cluster sequence shows a clearly defined but nonlinear MMR: in this particular photometric data set the mean GC color changes smoothly from a near-vertical sequence at low luminosity (MI≳ -9.5) to an increasingly redward slope at higher luminosity. By contrast, the red, metal-rich sequence shows little trace of an MMR and is nearly vertical at all luminosities. The form and slope of the MMR along either sequence do not depend strongly on either cluster size rh or galactocentric distance Rgc. All the observed features of the present data agree with the interpretation that the MMR is created primarily by GC self-enrichment, along the lines of the quantitative model of Bailin & Harris. During the protocluster formation stage, the more massive GCs are better able to hold back the enriched products of the earliest supernovae and to seed the lower-mass stars still in formation. The "threshold" mass at which this effect should become noticeable is near 1 million Solar masses, which is closely consistent with the transition region that is seen in the data. More generally, the data favor models in which the star formation efficiency in a protocluster is roughly independent of mass, and in which the gas retention efficiency is a strong function of mass. Correlation of the median scale sizes rh of the GCs with other parameters shows that the metal-poor clusters are consistently 17% larger than those of the metal-rich clusters, and that this difference holds at all galactocentric distances and luminosities. At the same time, cluster size scales with halo location as rh∼ R 0.11gc, indicating that both metallicity and the external tidal environment play roles in determining the scale size of a given cluster. Lastly, both the red and blue GC components show metallicity gradients with galactocentric distance that are shallow but real: heavy-element abundance scales as Z ∼ R –0.1gc for both types.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD - galaxies: star clusters - globular clusters: general

Simbad objects: 29

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 29
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
2 NGC 1399 rG 03 38 29.083 -35 27 02.67 11.05 9.74 9.59 8.12   ~ 1636 1
3 NAME Eridanus ClG GrG 03 38 32.00 -22 18 51.0           ~ 200 0
4 NGC 1407 rG 03 40 11.904 -18 34 49.36   10.64 9.67 9.13   ~ 613 2
5 NGC 1427 GiG 03 42 19.4455150392 -35 23 33.169251120   11.89   10.44   ~ 298 0
6 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
7 NGC 3258 EmG 10 28 53.588 -35 36 19.98   12.50 11.72 10.86   ~ 200 0
8 ACO S 636 ClG 10 29 41.0957 -35 19 32.908           ~ 248 0
9 NGC 3268 EmG 10 30 00.6490581240 -35 19 31.519591284   12.57 11.77 10.68   ~ 163 0
10 NGC 3311 EmG 10 36 42.821 -27 31 42.02   11.93 10.93 10.00 9.67 ~ 310 2
11 NGC 3348 GiG 10 47 10.0367649672 +72 50 22.685834940   12.0       ~ 127 0
12 [FWB89] GrG 221 GrG 10 54.1 +72 36   11.7       ~ 13 0
13 M 49 Sy2 12 29 46.8 +08 00 01   13.21 12.17     ~ 2174 2
14 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
15 M 104 LIN 12 39 59.43185902 -11 37 22.9961800 9.51 9.55 8.00 8.05   ~ 1465 2
16 M 60 GiC 12 43 39.9708251934 +11 33 09.688174067   10.3       ~ 1395 1
17 NGC 4696 rG 12 48 49.2724775784 -41 18 39.304053252   11.21   10.7   ~ 510 3
18 NAME Cen 30 ClG 12 48 51.7 -41 18 21           ~ 66 0
19 NGC 4874 LIN 12 59 35.7093764280 +27 57 33.293892204 13.01 13.7 12.71 12.27 11.386 ~ 814 3
20 NAME Centaurus A BLL 13 25 27.61521044 -43 01 08.8050291   8.18 6.84 6.66   ~ 4774 3
21 NGC 5139 GlC 13 26 47.28 -47 28 46.1           ~ 3677 0
22 NGC 5322 SyG 13 49 15.24 +60 11 25.8   11.3       ~ 432 2
23 NGC 5557 GiG 14 18 25.708 +36 29 37.28   12.2       ~ 237 0
24 M 102 SyG 15 06 29.561 +55 45 47.91 11.12 10.74 9.89     ~ 578 2
25 NAME Galactic Center reg 17 45 39.60213 -29 00 22.0000           ~ 16269 0
26 NGC 7049 GiP 21 19 00.2856324192 -48 33 43.713475092   11.28 10.74 9.77   ~ 150 1
27 NGC 7626 rG 23 20 42.524 +08 13 01.43   12.8       ~ 438 1
28 NAME Peg I ClG 23 21 +08.3           ~ 71 0
29 NAME Local Group GrG ~ ~           ~ 9325 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2009ApJ...699..254H and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu