2009MNRAS.392..718S


Query : 2009MNRAS.392..718S

2009MNRAS.392..718S - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 392, 718-732 (2009/January-2)

The population of early-type galaxies at 1 < z < 2 - new clues on their formation and evolution.

SARACCO P., LONGHETTI M. and ANDREON S.

Abstract (from CDS):

We present the morphological analysis based on Hubble Space Telescope HST-NICMOS (Near-Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer) observations in the F160W filter (λ ≃ 1.6µm) of a sample of 32 early-type galaxies (ETGs) at 1 < z < 2 with spectroscopic confirmation of their redshift and spectral type. The 32 ETGs at <z> ∼ 1.5 are placed on the (<µ>e, Re) plane according to the Kormendy relation (KR) with the same slope of the local one but with a different zero-point, which accounts for the evolution they undergo from z ∼ 1.5-2 to z = 0. The best fitting of their spectral energy distribution shows that ETGs at 1 < z < 2 are composed of two distinct populations, an older population (oETGs) and a younger population (yETGs) whose mean ages differ by about 1.5-2 Gyr. Young ETGs are not denser than local ones since they follow the size-mass relation of local ETGs, and luminosity evolution brings them on to the local KR and size-luminosity relations without the need of size evolution. Old ETGs do not follow the size-mass relation of local ETGs, and luminosity evolution does not account for the discrepancy they show with respect to the local size-luminosity relation and KR. An increase in their Re by a factor of 2.5-3 (a density decrease by a factor of 15-30) from z ∼ 1.5-2 to z ∼ 0 is required to bring these galaxies on to the local scaling relations. The different properties and the different behaviour shown by the two populations with respect to the scaling relations imply different formation and evolution scenarios. The older population of ETGs must have formed at a higher z in a sort of dissipative gas-rich collapse able to produce remnants which at z ∼ 2 are old and compact, a scenario which can be fitted qualitatively by some recent hydrodynamic simulations of gas-rich mergers. Given the typical time-scale of merging and the old age of their stellar population, oETGs should exist as they are up to z ≳ 3-3.5. The size evolution they must experience from z ∼ 2 to ∼0 must leave unchanged their mass to not exceed the local number of high-mass ETGs. Thus, major merging cannot fit this requirement. Satellite merging, close encounters and interactions can help at least qualitatively in solving this problem. The younger population of ETGs can be formed later through subsequent episodes of merging which increased progressively their size and assembled their mass down to z ∼ 2. At z < 2, they evolve purely in luminosity since episodes of major merging would bring them far from the local scaling relations.

Abstract Copyright: © 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 RAS

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: formation

Simbad objects: 35

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 35
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 MUNICS S2F5 109 G 03 06 21.08 -00 17 58.0   24.2 23.4     ~ 7 0
2 MUNICS S2F1 389 G 03 06 28.03 +00 00 31.6   24.3 23.7     ~ 10 0
3 MUNICS S2F1 443 G 03 06 31.76 +00 01 13.4     24.8     ~ 10 0
4 MUNICS S2F1 511 G 03 06 34.04 +00 02 30.9     25.4     ~ 10 0
5 MUNICS S2F1 633 G 03 06 35.10 +00 04 43.6   25.5 25.8     ~ 10 0
6 MUNICS S2F1 142 G 03 06 36.51 -00 03 01.0     24.7     ~ 11 0
7 MUNICS S2F1 527 G 03 06 43.34 +00 02 44.8           ~ 7 0
8 MUNICS S2F1 357 G 03 06 52.25 -00 00 09.9   25.8       ~ 8 0
9 EIS-DEEP CDFS-2 J 1 794 G 03 32 36.912 -27 46 28.52   29.0062 27.32 26.86 25.5969 ~ 36 0
10 EIS-DEEP CDFS-2 Ks 1 2280 G 03 32 38.113 -27 47 49.77 28.7063 27.2362 26.29 26.10 25.4189 ~ 41 0
11 NAME Hubble Ultra Deep Field reg 03 32 39.0 -27 47 29           ~ 1900 0
12 EES 237 G 08 48 30.79 +44 53 34.8           ~ 7 0
13 EES 65 GiC 08 48 32.4340 +44 53 34.970   28.4 26.17 24.74   ~ 6 0
14 EES 142 G 08 48 32.97 +44 53 46.6     26.65 24.93   ~ 11 0
15 ClG J0848+4453 ClG 08 48 34.800 +44 53 41.90           ~ 124 1
16 EES 70 G 08 48 35.97 +44 53 36.0     25.65 23.76   ~ 10 0
17 EES 108 G 08 48 36.16 +44 54 17.2     25.88 23.92   ~ 9 0
18 EES 135 GiC 08 48 36.2330 +44 53 55.420     27.00 24.65   ~ 6 0
19 GDDS SA12-6072 G 12 05 12.58 -07 23 56.5   26.17 25.37     ~ 6 0
20 GDDS SA12-8895 G 12 05 14.33 -07 20 14.5   26.02 24.67     ~ 6 0
21 [MYA2007] 4 GiC 12 05 21.55 -07 24 09.4   26.90 25.85   21.2 ~ 7 0
22 GDDS SA12-5592 G 12 05 22.13 -07 24 32.6   26.79 25.00     ~ 6 0
23 GDDS SA12-8025 G 12 05 25.40 -07 21 24.5   26.54 25.35     ~ 6 0
24 GOODS J123640.02+621207.7 G 12 36 40.0179 +62 12 07.703 25.22 24.7294 24.18 22.75 22.4290 ~ 29 0
25 Anon J123644+6212 AG? 12 36 44.15 +62 12 44.8 26.2 27.8412 25.3 24.9 24.9926 ~ 32 1
26 COLDz -cont-GN-8 rG 12 36 44.390 +62 11 33.05 26.48 25.0440 24.15 21.96 21.5999 ~ 93 0
27 NAME Hubble Deep Field reg 12 36 49.5 +62 12 58           ~ 1967 1
28 MUNICS S7F5 45 G 13 34 25.0 +16 45 49     24.2     ~ 9 0
29 MUNICS S7F5 254 G 13 34 59.6 +16 49 11   25.6 25.4     ~ 9 0
30 GDDS SA15-4367 G 15 23 42.63 -00 07 11.7   26.50 25.59     ~ 7 0
31 GDDS SA15-7543 G 15 23 44.83 -00 03 37.6   26.50 25.77     ~ 6 0
32 GDDS SA15-5005 G 15 23 45.96 -00 06 21.3   26.50 25.09     ~ 6 0
33 WSTB 53W91 rG 17 22 32.73 +50 06 01.9           ~ 79 0
34 [DBE2005] SSA22 2593 G 22 17 47.59 +00 13 27.1     25.68   23.01 ~ 8 0
35 [DBE2005] SSA22 1920 G 22 17 48.41 +00 16 08.8     25.89   23.69 ~ 7 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2009MNRAS.392..718S and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu