2009MNRAS.397.1435R


Query : 2009MNRAS.397.1435R

2009MNRAS.397.1435R - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 397, 1435-1453 (2009/August-2)

Star formation in extremely faint dwarf galaxies.

ROYCHOWDHURY S., CHENGALUR J.N., BEGUM A. and KARACHENTSEV I.D.

Abstract (from CDS):

We study the relationship between the gas column density (Σgas) and the star formation rate (SFR) surface density (ΣSFR) for a sample of 23 extremely faint dwarf irregular galaxies drawn from the Faint Irregular Galaxy GMRT (Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope) Survey (FIGGS). Our sample galaxies have a median Hi mass of 2.8x107M☉ and a median blue magnitude MB∼ -13.2. ΣSFR is derived from Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) data, while Σgas is derived from the GMRT-based FIGGS Hi 21-cm survey data. We find that Σgas averaged over the star-forming region of the disc lies below most estimates of the `threshold density' for star formation, and that the average ΣSFR is also lower than would be expected from the `Kennicutt-Schmidt' law. This deviation is indicative of an environmental dependence of star formation efficiencies, since the Kennicutt relation was derived from data on the central regions of large spiral and starburst galaxies. The star formation efficiency in small galaxies may be more relevant to modelling of star formation in gas-rich, low-metallicity systems in the early universe. We also use our data to look for small-scale (400 and 200pc) correlations between ΣSFR and Σgas. For 18 of our 23 galaxies, we find that ΣSFR can be parametrized as having a power-law dependence on Σgas. The power-law relation holds until one reaches the sensitivity limit of the GALEX data, i.e. we find no evidence for a `threshold density' below which star formation is completely cut off. The power-law slopes and coefficients however vary substantially from galaxy to galaxy, and are in general steeper than the value of ∼1.4 derived for large galaxies by Kennicutt. Further, as for the globally averaged quantities, the ΣSFR at 400pc resolution is in general lower than that predicted by the Kennicutt relation, with the deviation decreasing with increasing Σgas. Our computation of ΣSFR uses a calibration that assumes solar metallicity and a standard Salpeter initial mass function (IMF), similarly, the Σgas we use is not corrected for the molecular gas density. Incorporating corrections for molecular gas and low metallicity will increase the deviation from the Kennicutt relation. Conversely, truncating the IMF at the high-mass end would decrease the deviation from the Kennicutt relation. For the five galaxies for which a power law does not provide a good parametrization of the (ΣSFR,Σgas) relation, there are substantial offsets between the ultraviolet (UV) bright regions and the Hi high column density maps. Four of these five galaxies have Hi masses near the lower end of our sample distribution, while the remaining galaxy has a large central Hi hole. We have 200pc resolution images for 10 of our galaxies. At this resolution, the offsets between the peaks in the Hi and UV images are more pronounced, and a power-law parametrization is possible for only five of the 10 galaxies.

Abstract Copyright: © 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 RAS

Journal keyword(s): stars: formation - galaxies: dwarf - galaxies: irregular - galaxies: stellar content - radio lines: galaxies - ultraviolet: galaxies

Simbad objects: 31

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 31
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME Andromeda IV G 00 42 32.3 +40 34 19           ~ 80 0
2 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 12317 1
3 Z 458-20 AG? 01 07 23.0321 +16 41 00.988 15.01 14.55 14.07     ~ 148 0
4 LEDA 166062 AG? 01 44 42.3853 +27 17 16.156   17.1       ~ 46 0
5 NAME Magellanic Clouds GrG 03 00 -71.0           ~ 7988 0
6 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
7 Z 57-6 AG? 07 13 51.60 +10 31 19.0   14.9       ~ 105 0
8 Z 206-10 AG? 07 28 17.724 +40 46 11.36   15.50       ~ 155 0
9 [KK98a] 073940.2+164047 G 07 42 31.2 +16 33 40   15.6       ~ 52 0
10 Z 311-8 GiG 08 34 07.20 +66 10 54.0 15.39 15.03 14.70 14.49   ~ 357 2
11 UGC 5186 AG? 09 42 58.664 +33 15 56.10   16.5       ~ 52 0
12 UGC 5209 LSB 09 45 04.196 +32 14 16.03   19       ~ 66 0
13 NAME M 81-82 Group GrG 09 55 +69.1           ~ 758 0
14 Z 351-62 bCG 11 27 59.90 +78 59 39.0   14.50       ~ 346 1
15 Z 242-46 bCG 11 33 29.12 +49 14 17.4 14.69 14.61 14.25 14.17   ~ 242 1
16 NGC 3741 AG? 11 36 05.754 +45 17 02.96 15.01 14.55 14.23 14.06   ~ 237 0
17 Z 214-32 AG? 11 50 52.98254 +38 52 50.6594   13.72 13.9 13.39   ~ 175 0
18 ESO 321-14 AG? 12 13 48.8792 -38 14 00.250 16.32 15.70 15.35 15.20 15.2 ~ 92 0
19 LEDA 166137 GiC 12 25 28.5 +28 28 56   16.5       ~ 46 1
20 Z 216-4 GiG 12 27 40.90 +43 29 44.0 13.75 13.10 12.7 12.33   ~ 270 0
21 Z 187-47 GiG 12 28 38.743 +35 43 02.91 15.50 15.12 14.86 14.78   ~ 130 1
22 NAME CVn I Group GrG 12 32 48.3 +33 57 07           ~ 149 0
23 MCG+08-24-048 AG? 13 08 03.552 +46 49 40.02   17       ~ 79 0
24 MCG+08-24-090 AG? 13 13 22.839 +46 19 21.71   17       ~ 135 1
25 NAME Cen A Group GrG 13 20 33.9 -44 58 51           ~ 274 0
26 Z 218-34 AG? 13 39 53.75 +40 44 25.3 15.37 14.56 14.20 14.10   ~ 165 0
27 Z 190-66 AG? 13 50 51.3127548768 +38 01 14.958828876 15.56 14.78   14.33   ~ 161 0
28 MCG+06-31-023 AG? 13 54 48.8114 +35 50 07.775   16.5   15.20   ~ 123 1
29 NGC 7331 LIN 22 37 04.0506038088 +34 24 56.800076508 10.65 10.35 9.48     ~ 1284 2
30 LEDA 2807157 GiG 23 45 35.177 +38 43 05.09   16.7 15.2     ~ 93 1
31 NAME NGC 672 Group GrG ~ ~           ~ 14 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2009MNRAS.397.1435R and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu