2010ApJ...709.1018V


Query : 2010ApJ...709.1018V

2010ApJ...709.1018V - Astrophys. J., 709, 1018-1041 (2010/February-1)

The growth of massive galaxies since z = 2.

VAN DOKKUM P.G., WHITAKER K.E., BRAMMER G., FRANX M., KRIEK M., LABBE I., MARCHESINI D., QUADRI R., BEZANSON R., ILLINGWORTH G.D., MUZZIN A., RUDNICK G., TAL T. and WAKE D.

Abstract (from CDS):

We study the growth of massive galaxies from z = 2 to the present using data from the NOAO/Yale NEWFIRM Medium Band Survey. The sample is selected at a constant number density of n = 2x10–4/Mpc3, so that galaxies at different epochs can be compared in a meaningful way. We show that the stellar mass of galaxies at this number density has increased by a factor of {&x2248;}2 since z = 2, following the relation log Mn(z) = 11.45 - 0.15z. In order to determine at what physical radii this mass growth occurred, we construct very deep stacked rest-frame R-band images of galaxies with masses near Mn(z), at redshifts 〈z〉 = 0.6, 1.1, 1.6, and 2.0. These image stacks of typically 70-80 galaxies enable us to characterize the stellar distribution to surface brightness limits of ∼28.5 mag/arcsec2. We find that massive galaxies gradually built up their outer regions over the past 10 Gyr. The mass within a radius of r = 5 kpc is nearly constant with redshift, whereas the mass at 5 kpc < r < 75 kpc has increased by a factor of ∼4 since z = 2. Parameterizing the surface brightness profiles, we find that the effective radius and Sersic n parameter evolve as re{vprop} (1 + z)–1.3 and n {vprop} (1 + z)–1.0, respectively. The data demonstrate that massive galaxies have grown mostly inside-out, assembling their extended stellar halos around compact, dense cores with possibly exponential radial density distributions. Comparing the observed mass evolution to the average star formation rates of the galaxies we find that the growth is likely dominated by mergers, as in situ star formation can only account for ∼20% of the mass buildup from z = 2 to z = 0. A direct consequence of these results is that massive galaxies do not evolve in a self-similar way: their structural profiles change as a function of redshift, complicating analyses which (often implicitly) assume self-similarity. The main uncertainties in this study are possible redshift-dependent systematic errors in the total stellar masses and the conversion from light-weighted to mass-weighted radial profiles.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): cosmology: observations - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: formation

Simbad objects: 20

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 20
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 524 GiP 01 24 47.7429545736 +09 32 20.089023900   11.5       ~ 494 1
2 NGC 1316 rG 03 22 41.789 -37 12 29.52 9.81 9.15 8.53 7.66   ~ 1491 1
3 NGC 1399 rG 03 38 29.083 -35 27 02.67 11.05 9.74 9.59 8.12   ~ 1636 1
4 NGC 1407 rG 03 40 11.904 -18 34 49.36   10.64 9.67 9.13   ~ 613 2
5 NGC 2986 EmG 09 44 16.0193679072 -21 16 40.971622512   11.60 10.93 9.96   ~ 171 0
6 NAME COSMOS Field reg 10 00 28.60 +02 12 21.0           ~ 3639 0
7 NGC 3585 GiG 11 13 17.109 -26 45 17.96   10.64   9.22   ~ 304 0
8 NGC 3706 EmG 11 29 44.4309190968 -36 23 28.745465928   12.20 11.08 10.56   ~ 149 0
9 IC 3370 Sy2 12 27 37.3278534168 -39 20 16.247588712   11.99 12.12 10.39   ~ 152 0
10 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
11 M 104 LIN 12 39 59.43185902 -11 37 22.9961800 9.51 9.55 8.00 8.05   ~ 1465 2
12 NGC 4697 GiG 12 48 35.8981498824 -05 48 02.482374564   10.97   9.83   ~ 895 0
13 NGC 4767 GiG 12 53 52.9471545720 -39 42 51.419007360   12.62 11.53 10.90   ~ 91 0
14 NGC 5044 BiC 13 15 23.9607836592 -16 23 07.547751744   11.9   10.74   ~ 531 0
15 NGC 5077 rG 13 19 31.66962921 -12 39 25.0765176   13.87 12.85 11.30   ~ 312 1
16 NGC 5266 Sy2 13 43 02.0849196792 -48 10 10.000751592   11.89 11.14 11.9 11.3 ~ 167 0
17 NGC 5813 LIN 15 01 11.2302420864 +01 42 07.141569696 12.00 11.45 10.46 10.06   ~ 673 2
18 NGC 5846 rG 15 06 29.253 +01 36 20.29   11.9   9.74   ~ 891 2
19 NGC 6861 EmG 20 07 19.482 -48 22 12.94   12.01 11.10 10.43   ~ 211 0
20 NGC 6868 Sy2 20 09 54.08207 -48 22 46.2470   11.58 9.22 10.01 7.91 ~ 239 2

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2010ApJ...709.1018V and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu