2010ApJ...713.1343C


Query : 2010ApJ...713.1343C

2010ApJ...713.1343C - Astrophys. J., 713, 1343-1349 (2010/April-3)

A comparison of methods for determining the age distribution of star clusters: application to the Large Magellanic Cloud.

CHANDAR R., WHITMORE B.C. and FALL S.M.

Abstract (from CDS):

The age distribution of star clusters in nearby galaxies plays a crucial role in evaluating the lifetimes and disruption mechanisms of the clusters. Two very different results have been recently found for the age distribution χ(τ) of clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). We found that χ(τ) can be approximately described by a power law χ(τ) {vprop} τγ, with γ ≈ -0.8, by counting clusters in the mass-age plane, i.e., by constructing χ(τ) directly from mass-limited samples. Gieles & Bastian inferred a value of γ ≈ 0, based on the slope of the relation between the maximum mass of clusters in equal intervals of log τ, hereafter, the Mmaxmethod, an indirect technique that requires additional assumptions about the upper end of the mass function. However, our own analysis shows that the Mmax method gives a result consistent with our direct counting method for clusters in the LMC, namely, χ(τ) {vprop} τ–0.8 for τ ≲ 109 yr. The reason for the apparent discrepancy is that our analysis includes many intermediate and high-mass clusters (M > 1.5x103 M☉), which formed recently (τ ≲ 107 yr), and which are known to exist in the LMC, whereas Gieles & Bastian are missing such clusters. We compile recent results from the literature showing that the age distribution of young star clusters in more than a dozen galaxies, including dwarf and giant galaxies, isolated and interacting galaxies, and irregular and spiral galaxies, has a similar declining shape. We interpret this approximately "universal" shape as primarily due to the progressive disruption of star clusters over their first ∼fewx108 yr, starting soon after formation, and discuss some observational and physical implications of this early disruption for stellar populations in galaxies.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: individual: Large Magellanic Cloud - galaxies: star clusters: general - stars: formation

Simbad objects: 21

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 21
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 12317 1
2 NGC 922 EmG 02 25 04.400 -24 47 17.46   12.54 12.21 11.84   ~ 161 1
3 NAME Magellanic Clouds GrG 03 00 -71.0           ~ 7988 0
4 NGC 1313 AG? 03 18 16.046 -66 29 53.74   10.06 10.0 9.40 10.4 ~ 723 2
5 NGC 1850 Cl* 05 08 50.190 -68 45 35.65   8.84 8.96     ~ 298 1
6 NGC 1866 GlC 05 13 38.920 -65 27 52.75           ~ 437 0
7 OGLE-CL LMC 328 Cl* 05 18 11.41 -69 13 05.7   9.39 9.54     ~ 22 0
8 NAME S Dor Cluster Cl* 05 18 16 -69 15.1   15.0       ~ 17 0
9 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
10 NAME Hodge 4 GlC 05 32 25.64 -64 44 07.7     13.33     ~ 52 0
11 NAME 30 Dor Nebula SFR 05 38 36.0 -69 05 11           ~ 1276 2
12 RMC 136 Cl* 05 38 42.396 -69 06 03.36   5.81 5.40     ~ 2236 2
13 NGC 2100 Cl* 05 42 07.200 -69 12 26.99           ~ 195 0
14 NGC 3256 Sy2 10 27 51.284 -43 54 13.55   11.83 11.33 10.62 11.9 ~ 920 2
15 NAME Antennae IG 12 01 53.170 -18 52 37.92           ~ 1749 0
16 NGC 4395 Sy2 12 25 48.8633109888 +33 32 48.700168152 10.84 10.54 10.11 9.98   ~ 1286 1
17 M 51 Sy2 13 29 52.698 +47 11 42.93   9.26 8.36 8.40   ~ 4565 4
18 M 83 SBG 13 37 00.91920 -29 51 56.7400 8.85 8.11 7.52 7.21   ~ 2778 2
19 NGC 7714 AGN 23 36 14.1257730600 +02 09 18.197422668   14.91 14.36     ~ 788 1
20 APG 284 PaG 23 36 19 +02 09.3   12.6       ~ 608 0
21 NGC 7793 GiG 23 57 49.7540045856 -32 35 27.701550744 10.26 9.74 9.28 9.06 9.7 ~ 1188 2

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2010ApJ...713.1343C and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu