2010ApJ...720.1146L


Query : 2010ApJ...720.1146L

2010ApJ...720.1146L - Astrophys. J., 720, 1146-1154 (2010/September-2)

The Ep-flux correlation in the rising and decaying phases of gamma-ray burst pulses: evidence for viewing angle effect?

LU R.-J., HOU S.-J. and LIANG E.-W.

Abstract (from CDS):

A time-resolved spectral analysis for a sample of 22 intense, broad gamma-ray burst (GRB) pulses from the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO)/BATSE GRB sample is presented. We fit the spectra with the Band function and investigate the correlation between the observed flux (F) and the peak energy (Ep) of the νfν spectrum in the rising and decaying phases of these pulses. Two kinds of Ep evolution trends, i.e., hard-to-soft (two-thirds of the pulses in our sample) and Ep-tracing-F (one-third of the pulses in our sample), are observed in pulses from different GRBs and even from different pulses of the same burst. No dependence of spectral evolution feature on the pulse shape is found. A tight F-Ep positive correlation is observed in the decaying phases, with a power-law index ∼2.2, which is much shallower than that expected from the curvature effect. In the rising phase, the observed F is either correlated or anti-correlated with Ep, depending on the spectral evolution feature, and the power-law index of the correlation is dramatically different among pulses. More than 80% of the low-energy photon indices in the time-resolved spectra, whose Ep's are anti-correlated with F during the rising phase, violate the death line of the synchrotron radiation, disfavoring the synchrotron radiation model for these gamma rays. The F-Epcorrelation, especially for those GRBs with Ep-tracking-F spectral evolution, may be due to the viewing angle and jet structure effects. In this scenario, the observed F-Ep correlation in the rising phase may be due to the line of sight toward a structured jet (or jetter) moving from off-beam to on-beam, and both the on-beam emission and the delayed photons from high latitude of the GRB fireball contribute to the decaying phase, resulting in a shallower slope of the observed F-Ep correlation than that predicted by the pure curvature effect.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): gamma-ray burst: general - methods: data analysis - radiation mechanisms: non-thermal

VizieR on-line data: <Available at CDS (J/ApJ/720/1146): table1.dat table2.dat>

Simbad objects: 23

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 23
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 SN 2006aj SN* 03 21 39.670 +16 52 02.27 17.96 19.11 17.40     SNIc-BL 1007 1
2 GRB 990528 gB 04 30 -14.9           ~ 17 0
3 GRB 960912 gB 06 21 +78.8           ~ 20 0
4 3B 930612 gB 06 52.3 -69 46           ~ 48 0
5 4B 960530 gB 09 33.6 -53 47           ~ 31 0
6 GRB 990316 gB 10 11 -05.5           ~ 27 0
7 1B 910807 gB 10 15.4 +06 29           ~ 38 0
8 2B 920801 gB 10 31.4 +68 54           ~ 24 0
9 2B 920925 gB 10 41.0 +67 23           ~ 34 1
10 GRB 990816 gB 11 48 +07.7           ~ 18 0
11 2B 930214B gB 12 59.2 +26 46           ~ 32 0
12 GRB 940529C gB 14 19.4 +58 56           ~ 34 0
13 GRB 971127 gB 15 32 +32.2           ~ 24 0
14 2B 920830 gB 17 14.1 -73 59           ~ 38 0
15 GRB 990102 gB 18 22 +39.7           ~ 25 0
16 4B 950818 gB 18 34.6 +33 52           ~ 33 0
17 1B 911031 gB 18 58.2 +21 20           ~ 45 0
18 2B 920525 gB 19 58.5 -42 03           ~ 53 0
19 2B 921207 gB 20 25.3 -42 56           ~ 47 0
20 4B 960628 gB 21 47.9 +48 17           ~ 17 0
21 GRB 970925 gB 22 02 -11.7           ~ 24 0
22 GRB 980306B gB 22 48 -58.6           ~ 20 0
23 GRB 950701B gB 23 05.1 +37 44           ~ 20 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2010ApJ...720.1146L and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu