2010MNRAS.404..895V


Query : 2010MNRAS.404..895V

2010MNRAS.404..895V - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 404, 895-907 (2010/May-2)

Constraints on fNL and gNL from the analysis of the N-pdf of the CMB large-scale anisotropies.

VIELVA P. and SANZ J.L.

Abstract (from CDS):

In this paper, we extend a previous work where we presented a method based on the N-point probability density function (pdf) to study the Gaussianity of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). We explore a local non-linear perturbative model up to third order as a general characterization of the CMB anisotropies. We focus our analysis in large-scale anisotropies (θ > 1°). At these angular scales (the Sachs-Wolfe regime), the non-Gaussian description proposed in this work defaults (under certain conditions) to an approximated local form of the weak non-linear coupling inflationary model. In particular, the quadratic and cubic terms are governed by the non-linear coupling parameters fNL and gNL, respectively. The extension proposed in this paper allows us to directly constrain these non-linear parameters. Applying the proposed methodology to Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) 5-year data, we obtain -5.6x105 < gNL< 6.4x105, at 95 per cent confidence level. This result is in agreement with previous findings obtained for equivalent non-Gaussian models and with different non-Gaussian estimators, although this is the first direct constraint on gNL from CMB data. A model selection test is performed, indicating that a Gaussian model (i.e. fNL≡ 0 and gNL≡ 0) is preferred to the non-Gaussian scenario. When comparing different non-Gaussian models, we observe that a pure fNL model (i.e. gNL≡ 0) is the most favoured case and that a pure gNL model (i.e. fNL≡ 0) is more likely than a general non-Gaussian scenario (i.e. fNL≠ 0 and gNL≠ 0). Finally, we have analysed the WMAP data in two independent hemispheres, in particular the ones defined by the dipolar pattern found by Hoftuft et al. We show that, whereas the gNL value is compatible between both hemispheres, it is not the case for fNL(with a p-value of ~0.04). However, if, as suggested by Hoftuft et al., anisotropy of the data is assumed, the distance between the likelihood distributions for each hemisphere is larger than expected from Gaussian and anisotropic simulations, not only for fNL but also for gNL(with a p-value of ~0.001 in the case of this latter parameter). This result is extra evidence for the CMB asymmetries previously reported in WMAP data.

Abstract Copyright: © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 RAS

Journal keyword(s): methods: data analysis - methods: statistical - cosmic microwave background - cosmology: observations

Simbad objects: 1

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 1
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME NEP reg 18 00 00.000 +66 33 38.55           ~ 430 0

Query : 2010MNRAS.404..895V

Basic data :
NAME NEP -- Region defined in the Sky
Other object types:
otypes_help
reg ()
ICRS coord. (ep=J2000) :
18 00 00.000 +66 33 38.55 [ ] D ~
FK4 coord. (ep=B1950 eq=1950) :
18 00 00.300 +66 33 38.48 [ ]
Gal coord. (ep=J2000) :
096.383977 +29.811440 [ ]
SIMBAD within arcmin
Overlay Simbad points in this preview
Back
All CDSPortal (CDSPortal)

Send to sendBySAMP sendBySAMP

sedIcon
within arcsec sed-help-icon

Identifiers (3) :
An access of full data is available using the icon Vizier near the identifier of the catalogue

NAME NEP NAME North Ecliptic Pole NAME Northern Ecliptic Pole

References (430 between 1850 and 2026) (Total 430)
Simbad bibliographic survey began in 1850 for stars (at least bright stars) and in 1983 for all other objects (outside the solar system).
Follow new references on this object
                Reference summaries :

                from: to:

                 or select by : (not exhaustive, explanation here)


Observing logs

Herschel : 21    ISO : 10   

   


External archives :

Search by coordinates in Vizier (radius: 5 arcsec)


Annotations :
Annotations allow a user to add a note or report an error concerning the astronomical object and its data. It requires registration to post a note. See description .
Please, have a look at Best practices. The list of all annotations to SIMBAD objects can be found here .

The annotation server is currently not available. Sorry for any inconvenience


To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2010MNRAS.404..895V and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu