2012A&A...537A..25M


Query : 2012A&A...537A..25M

2012A&A...537A..25M - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 537A25-25 (2012/1-1)

Fossil group origins. II. Unveiling the formation of the brightest group galaxies through their scaling relations.

MENDEZ-ABREU J., AGUERRI J.A.L., BARRENA R., SANCHEZ-JANSSEN R., BOSCHIN W., CASTRO-RODRIGUEZ N., CORSINI E.M., DEL BURGO C., D'ONGHIA E., GIRARDI M., IGLESIAS-PARAMO J., NAPOLITANO N., VILCHEZ J.M. and ZARATTINI S.

Abstract (from CDS):

Fossil systems are galaxy associations dominated by a relatively isolated, bright elliptical galaxy, surrounded by a group of smaller galaxies lacking L* objects. Because of this extreme environment, fossil groups (FGs) are ideal laboratories for studying the mass assembly of brightest group galaxies (BGGs). We analyzed the near-infrared photometric and structural properties of a sample of 20 BGGs present in FGs to better understand their formation mechanisms. They represent the largest sample studied to date. Ks-band deep images were used to study the structural properties of our sample galaxies. Their surface-brightness distribution was fitted to a Sersic profile using the GASP2D algorithm. Then, the standard scaling relations were derived for the first time for these galaxies and compared with those of normal ellipticals and brightest cluster galaxies in non-fossil systems. The BGGs presented in this study represent a subset of the most massive galaxies in the Universe. We find that their ellipticity profiles are continuously increasing with the galactocentric radius. Our fossil BCGs follow closely the fundamental plane described by normal ellipticals. However, they depart from both the log σ0 vs. logLKs and logre vs. log LKs relations described by intermediate-mass ellipticals. This occurs in the sense that our BGGs have larger effective radii and smaller velocity dispersions than those predicted by these relations. We also find that more elliptical galaxies systematically deviate from the previous relations, while rounder objects do not. No similar correlation was found with the Sersic index. The derived scaling relations can be interpreted in terms of the formation scenario of the BGGs. Because our BGGs follow the fundamental plane tilt but have larger effective radii than expected for intermediate-mass ellipticals, we suggest that they only went through dissipational mergers in an early stage of their evolution and then assembled the bulk of their mass through subsequent dry mergers, contrary to previous claims that BGGs in FGs were mainly formed by the merging of gas-rich galaxies.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: photometry - galaxies: structure - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: formation - galaxies: elliptical and lenticular - cD - galaxies: fundamental parameters

Simbad objects: 38

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 38
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 545 BiC 01 25 59.12 -01 20 24.8   13.21 13.34     ~ 142 2
2 NGC 547 rG 01 26 00.6208982520 -01 20 42.432452268   13.16 13.34     ~ 363 4
3 ACO 194 ClG 01 26 01.3 -01 22 02           ~ 363 2
4 SDSS J015021.27-100530.5 BiC 01 50 21.2809120128 -10 05 30.291293652           ~ 8 0
5 ACO 267 ClG 01 52 43.016 +00 59 58.90           ~ 241 0
6 NGC 1272 GiG 03 19 21.300 +41 29 26.13   14.5 13.66     ~ 136 0
7 NGC 1275 Bla 03 19 48.1599902040 +41 30 42.108850836   13.10 12.48 11.09   ~ 4243 3
8 NGC 1316 rG 03 22 41.789 -37 12 29.52 9.81 9.15 8.53 7.66   ~ 1491 1
9 NGC 1407 rG 03 40 11.904 -18 34 49.36   10.64 9.67 9.13   ~ 613 2
10 7C 074905.70+460420.00 BLL 07 52 44.2077683088 +45 56 57.426578736   17.95 16.93     ~ 125 1
11 7C 080418.60+340933.00 Bla 08 07 30.749 +34 00 41.70       15.8   ~ 20 1
12 SDSS J084257.55+362159.2 BiC 08 42 57.557 +36 21 59.25   20.48   17.95   ~ 24 1
13 LEDA 2209529 G 08 44 49.0835000400 +42 56 42.208390248           ~ 7 1
14 NAME HYA SUPERCL SCG 08 57.9 +03 10           ~ 204 0
15 SDSS J090303.18+273929.3 GiC 09 03 03.19 +27 39 29.4           ~ 5 1
16 SDSS J094829.04+495506.7 GiC 09 48 29.04 +49 55 06.8           ~ 5 1
17 NGC 3309 rG 10 36 35.6607096792 -27 31 05.732321664   11.98 11.78 10.34 10.51 ~ 167 0
18 NGC 3311 EmG 10 36 42.821 -27 31 42.02   11.93 10.93 10.00 9.67 ~ 310 2
19 2dFGRS TGN431Z233 BiC 10 43 02.5696698696 +00 54 18.263016072   17.704   16.082   ~ 12 1
20 NVSS J105452+552111 rG 10 54 52.024 +55 21 12.25           ~ 12 2
21 2MASS J11143975+4037350 BiC 11 14 39.7701513168 +40 37 35.163187032   19.5       ~ 4 1
22 2MASS J11215524+1049230 Sy2 11 21 55.246 +10 49 23.08   21.50 20.23     ~ 11 2
23 NVSS J114128+055828 rG 11 41 28.299 +05 58 29.48           ~ 9 1
24 FIRST J114647.5+095228 rG 11 46 47.571 +09 52 28.17   19.3       ~ 16 2
25 SDSS J124742.07+413137.6 BiC 11 49 15.0407756136 +48 11 04.910587224           ~ 5 1
26 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
27 NGC 4696 rG 12 48 49.2724775784 -41 18 39.304053252   11.21   10.7   ~ 510 3
28 NGC 4874 LIN 12 59 35.7093764280 +27 57 33.293892204 13.01 13.7 12.71 12.27 11.386 ~ 814 3
29 NGC 4889 EmG 13 00 08.097 +27 58 37.29 12.93 13.0 11.30 11.652 10.906 ~ 742 1
30 NVSS J133559-033124 rG 13 35 59.9693018736 -03 31 29.074028232   17.81   16.14   ~ 15 1
31 Z 78-79 BiC 15 48 55.854 +08 50 44.36   15.4       ~ 21 1
32 2MASX J16143111+2643504 BiC 16 14 31.1101696200 +26 43 50.334985452   15.89   13.24   ~ 9 1
33 ACO 2199 ClG 16 28 34.5 +39 32 26           ~ 1206 1
34 NGC 6166 Sy2 16 28 38.24470063 +39 33 04.2335319   12.78 11.78     ~ 793 2
35 LEDA 3334237 rG 22 56 30.0459747168 -00 32 10.795802856   18.0   16.1   ~ 7 1
36 ACO 2634 ClG 23 38 18.4 +27 01 37           ~ 515 2
37 NGC 7720 Sy1 23 38 29.38324020 +27 01 53.2580084   13.9 13.3     ~ 565 4
38 GSC2 N00012134983 BiC 23 58 15.108 +15 05 43.60   16.05   14.08   ~ 7 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2012A&A...537A..25M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu