2012A&A...537A..48M


Query : 2012A&A...537A..48M

2012A&A...537A..48M - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 537A48-48 (2012/1-1)

The scaling relation between the mass of supermassive black holes and the kinetic energy of random motions of the host galaxies.

MANCINI L. and FEOLI A.

Abstract (from CDS):

Thanks to the improved angular resolution of modern telescopes and kinematic models, the existence of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the inner part of galaxies, regardless their morphology and nuclear activity, has been established on quite solid grounds. A possible correlation between the mass of SMBHs (Mo) and the evolutionary state of their host galaxies is expected and is currently under a heated debate. Based on the recent 2D decomposition of 3.6µm Spitzer/IRAC images of local late- and early-type galaxies with Mo measurements, we investigated various scaling laws, studying what is the best predictor of the mass of the central black holes, that is the one with the lowest value of intrinsic scatter. In particular, we focused on the Mo-MGσ2 law, that is the relation between the mass of SMBHs and the kinetic energy of random motions of the corresponding host galaxies, MG is the mass and σ the velocity dispersion of the host galaxy (bulge). In order to find the best fit for each of the scaling laws examined, we performed a least-squares regression of Mo onxfor the considered sample of galaxies,xbeing a whatever known parameter of the galaxy bulge. For this purpose, we made use of both the linear regression LINMIX_ERR and FITEXY methods. Our analysis shows that Mo-MGσ2 law fits the examined experimental data successfully as much as the other known scaling laws (all correlations have similar intrinsic scatters within the errors) and shows a value of χ2 (estimated by FITEXY) better than the others, a result which is consistent with previous determinations at shorter wavelengths. This means that a combination of σ and MG (or Re) could be necessary to drive the correlations between Mo and other bulge properties. This issue has been investigated by a careful, although not fully conclusive, analysis of the residuals of the various relations. In order to avoid rushed conclusions on galaxy activity and evolution, the indirect inferring of the masses of the supermassive black holes from the kinetic energy of random motions via the Mo-MGσ2 relation should be considered, especially when applied to higher redshift galaxies (z>0.01). This statement is suggested by a reanalysis of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data used to study the black hole growth in the nearby Universe. By adopting the Mo-MGσ2 relation instead of the Mo-σ relation, a radio-quiet/radio-loud dichotomy appears in the SMBH mass distribution of the corresponding SDSS early-type AGN galaxies.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): black hole physics - galaxies: active - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics - galaxies: statistics - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: general

Simbad objects: 56

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 56
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 32 GiG 00 42 41.82480 +40 51 54.6120 9.51 9.03 8.08     ~ 2236 2
2 NGC 524 GiP 01 24 47.7429545736 +09 32 20.089023900   11.5       ~ 494 1
3 NGC 821 AG? 02 08 21.1358498040 +10 59 41.832436704   12.210 11.310 10.739 9.744 ~ 592 0
4 NGC 1023 AG? 02 40 24.0133575864 +39 03 47.663392896 10.91 10.35 9.35 7.83   ~ 689 2
5 M 77 Sy2 02 42 40.7091669408 -00 00 47.859690204 9.70 9.61 8.87 10.1 9.9 ~ 4897 2
6 NGC 1300 Sy2 03 19 41.0462219928 -19 24 40.187565432   11.16 10.42 9.90 10.7 ~ 616 0
7 NGC 1316 rG 03 22 41.789 -37 12 29.52 9.81 9.15 8.53 7.66   ~ 1491 1
8 NGC 2549 AG? 08 18 58.3507032336 +57 48 11.022298740   12.1       ~ 271 0
9 NGC 2778 GiP 09 12 24.3741783168 +35 01 39.140496840   13.1       ~ 303 0
10 NGC 2748 GiG 09 13 43.03707 +76 28 31.2310   11.7       ~ 223 0
11 NGC 2787 LIN 09 19 18.6046606656 +69 12 11.630716128   12.92 11.79     ~ 381 0
12 NGC 2974 Sy2 09 42 33.2918467632 -03 41 57.038311068   12.19   10.77   ~ 463 0
13 M 81 Sy2 09 55 33.1726556496 +69 03 55.062505368   7.89 6.94     ~ 4725 3
14 NGC 3079 Sy2 10 01 57.8789863992 +55 40 47.449758324 11.57 11.54 10.86     ~ 1476 3
15 NGC 3115 GiG 10 05 13.9270507008 -07 43 06.982712292   11   9.37   ~ 1067 2
16 IC 2560 Sy2 10 16 18.7073057664 -33 33 49.720274676   12.53 13.31 11.25 12.2 ~ 283 1
17 NGC 3227 Sy1 10 23 30.5765149296 +19 51 54.282206700   12.61 11.79     ~ 1807 2
18 NGC 3245 LIN 10 27 18.3864983136 +28 30 26.621599932   11.6       ~ 372 0
19 M 96 GiP 10 46 45.744 +11 49 11.78 10.42 10.15 9.25 8.99   ~ 862 1
20 NGC 3377 GiP 10 47 42.400 +13 59 08.30 11.55 11.24 10.38     ~ 798 1
21 M 105 LIN 10 47 49.600 +12 34 53.87   10.56 9.76 9.12 8.18 ~ 1504 0
22 NGC 3384 GiG 10 48 16.8855574392 +12 37 45.371165844   10.0       ~ 617 1
23 NGC 3414 GiC 10 51 16.2099174408 +27 58 30.297624852   12.1       ~ 353 0
24 NGC 3489 GiG 11 00 18.5483994744 +13 54 04.206202668 11.46 11.12 10.29     ~ 429 1
25 NGC 3585 GiG 11 13 17.109 -26 45 17.96   10.64   9.22   ~ 304 0
26 NGC 3607 Sy2 11 16 54.65687 +18 03 06.5120   13.84 12.76     ~ 490 1
27 NGC 3608 LIN 11 16 58.967 +18 08 54.71   11.7       ~ 527 0
28 NGC 3998 Sy2 11 57 56.1334044408 +55 27 12.922443432   11.64 12.10 10.09   ~ 682 2
29 NGC 4026 GiP 11 59 25.0914676128 +50 57 41.951225700   12.17       ~ 290 0
30 NGC 4151 Sy1 12 10 32.5759813872 +39 24 21.063527532   12.18 11.48     ~ 3938 2
31 M 106 Sy2 12 18 57.620 +47 18 13.39   9.14 8.41 8.11   ~ 2512 4
32 NGC 4261 LIN 12 19 23.2160630 +05 49 29.700024   13.92 12.87     ~ 1290 0
33 M 84 Sy2 12 25 03.74333 +12 53 13.1393 12.67 12.09 10.49     ~ 1841 2
34 NGC 4459 H2G 12 29 00.0329905416 +13 58 42.826603332   11.6       ~ 567 0
35 NGC 4473 GiG 12 29 48.878 +13 25 45.55 11.60 11.16 10.20     ~ 671 1
36 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
37 NGC 4486A GiG 12 30 57.7095721176 +12 16 13.316512872   11.2 11.59 12.02   ~ 242 1
38 M 89 Sy2 12 35 39.80733343 +12 33 22.8308657 11.29 10.73 9.75     ~ 1037 2
39 NGC 4564 GiG 12 36 26.9869512504 +11 26 21.204472848 12.51 12.05 11.12     ~ 615 1
40 NGC 4596 GiP 12 39 55.9544722920 +10 10 34.185047628   12.4       ~ 387 0
41 M 104 LIN 12 39 59.43185902 -11 37 22.9961800 9.51 9.55 8.00 8.05   ~ 1465 2
42 M 59 GiG 12 42 02.2581375168 +11 38 48.909507756   11.0       ~ 721 0
43 M 60 GiC 12 43 39.9708251934 +11 33 09.688174067   10.3       ~ 1395 1
44 NGC 4697 GiG 12 48 35.8981498824 -05 48 02.482374564   10.97   9.83   ~ 895 0
45 NGC 5077 rG 13 19 31.66962921 -12 39 25.0765176   13.87 12.85 11.30   ~ 312 1
46 NAME Centaurus A BLL 13 25 27.61521044 -43 01 08.8050291   8.18 6.84 6.66   ~ 4774 3
47 IC 4296 rG 13 36 39.03253319 -33 57 57.0730368   11.52 12.99 10.00 10.79 ~ 520 2
48 NGC 5576 GiP 14 21 03.691 +03 16 15.78 12.25 11.85 10.96     ~ 347 1
49 NGC 5813 LIN 15 01 11.2302420864 +01 42 07.141569696 12.00 11.45 10.46 10.06   ~ 673 2
50 NGC 5845 GiG 15 06 00.7823239488 +01 38 01.704838596   13.8 11.20 12.06 9.94 ~ 403 0
51 NGC 5846 rG 15 06 29.253 +01 36 20.29   11.9   9.74   ~ 891 2
52 NGC 6251 Bla 16 32 31.96989253 +82 32 16.3999044 15.24 14.66 12.89 7.62   ~ 772 1
53 NGC 7052 rG 21 18 33.0441963648 +26 26 49.174586196 15.52 14.85 13.09     ~ 348 1
54 IC 1459 rG 22 57 10.60682195 -36 27 43.9966421   10.96 11.85 9.34 10.3 ~ 652 2
55 NGC 7457 AG? 23 00 59.9263288440 +30 08 41.764398792   11.04 11.87     ~ 459 0
56 NGC 7582 Sy2 23 18 23.60 -42 22 13.3 11.62 10.92 10.62     ~ 978 3

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2012A&A...537A..48M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu