2012A&A...539A..54C


Query : 2012A&A...539A..54C

2012A&A...539A..54C - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 539A54-54 (2012/3-1)

An optical/NIR survey of globular clusters in early-type galaxies. III. On the colour bimodality of globular cluster systems.

CHIES-SANTOS A.L., LARSEN S.S., CANTIELLO M., STRADER J., KUNTSCHNER H., WEHNER E.M. and BRODIE J.P.

Abstract (from CDS):

The interpretation that bimodal colour distributions of globular clusters (GCs) reflect bimodal metallicity distributions has been challenged. Non-linearities in the colour to metallicity conversions caused for example by the horizontal branch (HB) stars may be responsible for transforming a unimodal metallicity distribution into a bimodal (optical) colour distribution. We study optical/near-infrared (NIR) colour distributions of the GC systems in 14 E/S0 galaxies. We test whether the bimodal feature, generally present in optical colour distributions, remains in the optical/NIR ones. The latter colour combination is a better metallicity proxy than the former. We use KMM and GMM tests to quantify the probability that different colour distributions are better described by a bimodal, as opposed to a unimodal distribution. We find that double-peaked colour distributions are more commonly seen in optical than in optical/NIR colours. For some of the galaxies where the optical (g-z) distribution is clearly bimodal, a bimodal distribution is not preferred over a unimodal one at a statistically significant level for the (g-K) and (z-K) distributions. The two most cluster-rich galaxies in our sample, NGC4486 and NGC4649, show some interesting differences. The (g-K) distribution of NGC4649 is better described by a bimodal distribution, while this is true for the (g-K) distribution of NGC4486 GCs only if restricted to a brighter sub-sample with small K-band errors (<0.05mag). Formally, the K-band photometric errors cannot be responsible for blurring bimodal metallicity distributions to unimodal (g-K) colour distributions. However, simulations including the extra scatter in the colour-colour diagrams (not fully accounted for in the photometric errors) show that such scatter may contribute to the disappearance of bimodality in (g-K) for the full NGC4486 sample. For the less cluster-rich galaxies results are inconclusive due to poorer statistics. A bimodal optical colour distribution is not necessarily an indication of an underlying bimodal metallicity distribution. Horizontal branch morphology may play an important role in shaping some of the optical GC colour distributions. However, we find tentative evidence that the (g-K) colour distributions remain bimodal in the two cluster-rich galaxies in our sample (NGC4486 and NGC4649) when restricted to clusters with small K-band photometric errors. This bimodality becomes less pronounced when including objects with larger errors, or for the (z-K) colour distributions. Deeper observations of large numbers of GCs will be required to reach more secure conclusions.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: evolution - galaxies: star clusters: general - galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD

Simbad objects: 22

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 22
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
2 NGC 1399 rG 03 38 29.083 -35 27 02.67 11.05 9.74 9.59 8.12   ~ 1636 1
3 NGC 1407 rG 03 40 11.904 -18 34 49.36   10.64 9.67 9.13   ~ 613 2
4 NGC 3377 GiP 10 47 42.400 +13 59 08.30 11.55 11.24 10.38     ~ 798 1
5 NGC 4278 LIN 12 20 06.8242 +29 16 50.722 11.54 11.09 10.16     ~ 988 2
6 NGC 4365 GiG 12 24 28.228 +07 19 03.07   11.5       ~ 871 0
7 M 84 Sy2 12 25 03.74333 +12 53 13.1393 12.67 12.09 10.49     ~ 1841 2
8 M 85 GiP 12 25 24.053 +18 11 27.89   10.2       ~ 678 0
9 M 86 GiG 12 26 11.814 +12 56 45.49 10.32 9.83 8.90   7.50 ~ 1126 1
10 M 49 Sy2 12 29 46.8 +08 00 01   13.21 12.17     ~ 2174 2
11 NGC 4473 GiG 12 29 48.878 +13 25 45.55 11.60 11.16 10.20     ~ 671 1
12 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
13 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
14 NGC 4494 GiP 12 31 24.0391348536 +25 46 30.071664120   10.55 9.74     ~ 491 0
15 NGC 4526 GiC 12 34 03.02853 +07 41 56.9040   10.6       ~ 707 0
16 M 89 Sy2 12 35 39.80733343 +12 33 22.8308657 11.29 10.73 9.75     ~ 1037 2
17 NGC 4570 GiG 12 36 53.3828233728 +07 14 47.697174852   11.8       ~ 342 0
18 M 104 LIN 12 39 59.43185902 -11 37 22.9961800 9.51 9.55 8.00 8.05   ~ 1465 2
19 M 59 GiG 12 42 02.2581375168 +11 38 48.909507756   11.0       ~ 721 0
20 M 60 GiC 12 43 39.9708251934 +11 33 09.688174067   10.3       ~ 1395 1
21 NGC 4660 GiP 12 44 31.9814021280 +11 11 25.739106972   12.1       ~ 434 0
22 NAME Centaurus A BLL 13 25 27.61521044 -43 01 08.8050291   8.18 6.84 6.66   ~ 4774 3

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2012A&A...539A..54C and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu