2012MNRAS.421.1678Z


Query : 2012MNRAS.421.1678Z

2012MNRAS.421.1678Z - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 421, 1678-1696 (2012/April-1)

Testing three derivative methods of stellar population synthesis models.

ZHANG Y., HAN Z., LIU J., ZHANG F. and KANG X.

Abstract (from CDS):

The number of methods used to study the properties of galaxies is increasing, and it is very important to test these methods. Galactic globular clusters (GCs) provide an excellent medium for such tests, because they can be considered as simple stellar populations. We present ages and metallicities for 40 Galactic GCs as determined from three publicly available techniques, namely the colour, Lick-index and spectrum-fitting methods, based on Bruzual & Charlot evolutionary population synthesis (EPS) models. By comparisons with the ages obtained from colour–magnitude diagrams (CMDs) and metallicities obtained from the spectra of stars, we are able to estimate the ability of these methods to determine GC parameters, which is essential. We find that: (i) for the metallicity, our derived metallicities agree with those derived from the spectra of stars – the Lick-index method is suitable for studying metallicity for stellar population systems in the range -1.5 ≲ [ Fe/H ] ≲ - 0.7 and the spectrum-fitting method is suitable for studying metallicity for stellar population systems in the range -2.3 ≲ [ Fe/H ] ≲ - 1.5; (ii) for the age, these three methods have difficulties in age determination – our derived ages are smaller (by about 2.0 Gyr, on average) than the results of CMDs for all three methods. We use Vazdekis and Maraston models to analyse whether our results are dependent on EPS models, and find that the tendency of these two models is the same as that of Bruzual & Charlot models. Our results are independent of the EPS models. In addition, our test is based on old GCs and our conclusions may hold for old stellar population systems.

Besides the age–metallicity degeneracy, we examine the possible effects of other factors (horizontal branch morphology, blue straggler stars, binary interactions and α-enhancement) and give a quantitative analysis of the influences of these factors on age determinations (except for α-enhancement). For the colour and spectrum-fitting methods, the age can be underestimated by about 0.0–3.0, 0.0–2.0 and 0.0–3.0 Gyr owing to the influence of horizontal branch, blue straggler and binary stars, respectively. For the Lick-index method, the lower limit of maximal change of age is 6.0, 5.0 and 3.0 Gyr owing to the influence of horizontal branch, blue straggler and binary stars, respectively.


Abstract Copyright: 2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2012 RAS

Journal keyword(s): globular clusters: general - galaxies: fundamental parameters - galaxies: stellar content

Simbad objects: 45

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 45
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 104 GlC 00 24 05.359 -72 04 53.20     4.09     ~ 4158 0
2 NGC 1851 GlC 05 14 06.76 -40 02 47.6           ~ 1529 0
3 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
4 M 79 GlC 05 24 10.59 -24 31 27.3     8.16     ~ 883 0
5 ESO 121-3 Cl* 06 02 03.32 -60 31 25.6   14.91 14.04     ~ 118 0
6 NGC 2298 GlC 06 48 59.41 -36 00 19.1     8.89     ~ 547 0
7 NGC 2808 GlC 09 12 03.10 -64 51 48.6           ~ 1540 0
8 NGC 3201 GlC 10 17 36.82 -46 24 44.9           ~ 1001 0
9 NGC 5286 GlC 13 46 26.81 -51 22 27.3           ~ 485 0
10 M 5 GlC 15 18 33.22 +02 04 51.7     5.95     ~ 2095 0
11 NGC 5927 GlC 15 28 00.69 -50 40 22.9           ~ 499 0
12 NGC 5946 GlC 15 35 28.58 -50 39 35.0           ~ 210 0
13 NGC 5986 GlC 15 46 03.00 -37 47 11.1     6.92     ~ 408 0
14 M 4 GlC 16 23 35.22 -26 31 32.7           ~ 1978 0
15 M 107 GlC 16 32 31.86 -13 03 13.6           ~ 835 0
16 M 12 GlC 16 47 14.18 -01 56 54.7     6.07     ~ 736 0
17 NGC 6235 GlC 16 53 25.36 -22 10 38.8   11.99 7.20     ~ 208 0
18 M 10 GlC 16 57 09.05 -04 06 01.1     4.98     ~ 857 0
19 M 62 GlC 17 01 12.60 -30 06 44.5           ~ 668 0
20 NGC 6284 GlC 17 04 28.747 -24 45 51.22   10.72 7.43     ~ 302 0
21 NGC 6304 GlC 17 14 32.25 -29 27 43.3           ~ 394 0
22 NGC 6338 Bla 17 15 22.9842192344 +57 24 40.346559927   14.2   8   ~ 205 2
23 NGC 6316 GlC 17 16 37.42 -28 08 24.0   10.33 9.03     ~ 247 0
24 M 9 GlC 17 19 11.78 -18 30 58.5   9.36 8.42     ~ 348 0
25 NGC 6342 GlC 17 21 10.14 -19 35 14.7     10.01     ~ 310 0
26 NGC 6356 GlC 17 23 34.99 -17 48 46.9   10.01 7.42     ~ 372 1
27 NGC 6352 GlC 17 25 29.11 -48 25 19.8           ~ 425 0
28 NGC 6362 GlC 17 31 54.99 -67 02 54.0           ~ 637 0
29 NGC 6388 GlC 17 36 17.461 -44 44 08.34           ~ 988 1
30 NAME Galactic Center reg 17 45 39.60213 -29 00 22.0000           ~ 16269 0
31 NGC 6441 GlC 17 50 13.06 -37 03 05.2           ~ 940 0
32 NGC 6522 GlC 18 03 34.08 -30 02 02.3           ~ 569 0
33 NGC 6528 GlC 18 04 49.61 -30 03 20.8   12.12 10.65     ~ 561 0
34 NGC 6544 GlC 18 07 20.58 -24 59 50.4   11.36 9.90     ~ 332 0
35 NGC 6553 GlC 18 09 15.68 -25 54 27.9   9.08       ~ 644 0
36 NGC 6569 GlC 18 13 38.88 -31 49 35.2   10.78 9.47     ~ 276 0
37 NGC 6624 GlC 18 23 40.51 -30 21 39.7           ~ 939 1
38 M 28 GlC 18 24 32.89 -24 52 11.4           ~ 821 0
39 NGC 6638 GlC 18 30 56.25 -25 29 47.1   10.81 9.68     ~ 258 0
40 M 69 GlC 18 31 23.10 -32 20 53.1           ~ 492 0
41 NGC 6652 GlC 18 35 45.63 -32 59 26.6           ~ 474 0
42 NGC 6723 GlC 18 59 33.15 -36 37 56.1           ~ 543 0
43 NGC 6752 GlC 19 10 52.11 -59 59 04.4           ~ 2121 0
44 M 15 GlC 21 29 58.33 +12 10 01.2           ~ 3274 0
45 NAME Galactic Bulge reg ~ ~           ~ 4794 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2012MNRAS.421.1678Z and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu