2012MNRAS.422.2444S


Query : 2012MNRAS.422.2444S

2012MNRAS.422.2444S - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 422, 2444-2464 (2012/May-3)

The symmetries and scaling of tidal tails in galaxies.

STRUCK C. and SMITH B.J.

Abstract (from CDS):

We present analytic models for the formation and evolution of tidal tails and related structures following single or multiple impulsive disturbances in galaxy collisions. Since the epicyclic approximation is not valid for large radial excursions, we use orbital equations of the form we call p-ellipses (a class of precessing ellipses). These have been shown to provide accurate representations of orbits in logarithmic and power-law halo potentials.

In the simplest case of an impulsive collision yielding a purely tidal disturbance the resulting tidal tails have simple structure. Scalings for their maximum lengths and other characteristics as non-linear functions of the tidal amplitude and the exponent of the power-law potentials are described. The analytic model shows that azimuthal caustics (orbit crossing zones of high density also seen in numerical models) are produced generically in these tails at a fixed azimuth relative to the point of closest approach. Long tails, with high-order caustics at their base, and ocular waveforms are also produced at larger amplitudes.

The analysis is then extended to non-linear disturbances and multiple encounters, which break the symmetries of purely tidal perturbations. The p-ellipse orbital solutions are similar to those in the linear tidal case. However, as the strength of the non-linear terms is varied the structure of the resulting forms varies from symmetric tails to one-armed plumes. Cases with two or more impulse disturbances are also considered as the simplest analytic models distinguishing between prograde and retrograde encounters. The model shows explicitly how tail growth differs in the two cases. In the prograde case a specific mechanism for the formation of tidal dwarf galaxies at the end of tails is suggested as a consequence of resonance effects in multiple or prolonged encounters. Qualitative comparisons to Arp Atlas systems suggest that the limiting analytic cases are realized in real systems. For example, we identify a few Arp systems which have multiple tidal strands meeting near the base of long tails. These may be swallowtail caustics, where dissipative gas streams are converging and triggering star formation. Ultraviolet and optical images reveal luminous knots of young stars at these `hinge clump' locations.


Abstract Copyright: 2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2012 RAS

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: evolution - galaxies: interactions - galaxies: spiral

Simbad objects: 37

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 37
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 APG 65 IG 00 21.9 +22 23           ~ 17 0
2 IC 18 EmG 00 28 34.951 -11 35 12.30   15   16.34   ~ 29 0
3 IC 167 GiP 01 51 08.56 +21 54 46.1   14.0       ~ 101 0
4 NGC 1097 LIN 02 46 19.059 -30 16 29.68 10.46 9.97 9.48 8.72 9.8 ~ 1448 3
5 UGC 2320 IG 02 50 10.66 +12 52 50.4   15.2       ~ 24 0
6 APG 179 EmG 03 02 00.4114434600 -04 41 26.041334100   16.12   14.89   ~ 18 0
7 Z 362-30 GiP 07 02 27.5177506800 +86 34 46.222523364   15.6       ~ 26 1
8 NGC 2535 GiG 08 11 13.484 +25 12 24.97   13.5 12.60     ~ 185 0
9 APG 82 PaG 08 11 14.0 +25 12 25           ~ 146 0
10 NGC 2523 AG? 08 15 00.1388949576 +73 34 44.302765908   12.4       ~ 95 0
11 Z 89-40 AGN 08 31 57.6488660112 +19 12 41.504563224   14.9       ~ 39 0
12 NGC 2633 GiG 08 48 04.6279110889 +74 05 55.032130996   12.4       ~ 176 1
13 APG 285 GrG 09 24.1 +49 13           ~ 55 0
14 NGC 3068 IG 09 58 40.0900038984 +28 52 39.105926688   15.1 14.05     ~ 33 0
15 NGC 3189 GiP 10 18 05.643 +21 49 54.98 12.60 12.12 11.15 11.14   ~ 422 2
16 NGC 3561 LIN 11 11 13.1887412409 +28 41 47.044176908   14.7       ~ 202 2
17 MCG+10-17-005 IG 11 28 45.8500774416 +58 35 36.676808628   16   16.10   ~ 16 1
18 NGC 3718 Sy2 11 32 34.8571790688 +53 04 04.520222040   11.35 10.61     ~ 408 1
19 NGC 3800 GiC 11 40 13.51680 +15 20 32.4920   13.1       ~ 111 1
20 NGC 4016 AG? 11 58 29.02511 +27 31 43.6086   14.6       ~ 79 0
21 NGC 4676 IG 12 46 10.18 +30 43 53.7   14.1       ~ 318 0
22 APG 33 IG 13 37.6 +06 26           ~ 3 0
23 APG 240 PaG 13 39 55.06 +00 50 06.4   12.6       ~ 158 0
24 APG 84 IG 13 58 34.30 +37 27 10.9           ~ 147 0
25 NGC 5566 AG? 14 20 19.94760 +03 56 00.9240 11.91 11.46 10.55     ~ 193 2
26 UGC 9503 IG 14 45 26.3385071664 +19 27 56.453916852   15.00       ~ 35 0
27 APG 173 IG 14 51 28.8 +09 19 38           ~ 12 0
28 UGC 10033 IG 15 46 56.1 +17 52 42           ~ 118 0
29 APG 101 IG 16 04.5 +14 52           ~ 7 0
30 VV 29 IG 16 06 03.9082292784 +55 25 31.588100688   15.0       ~ 122 0
31 GCl 38 GlC 16 10 59.00 +14 57 42.0           ~ 399 0
32 APG 293 G 16 58 27.8 +58 56 48           ~ 115 0
33 Z 252-40 Bla 17 19 14.4925971408 +48 58 49.423205136   15.86 14.81 9.44   ~ 335 1
34 GCl 111 GlC 19 18 02.10 +18 34 18.0           ~ 138 0
35 NGC 7252 AGN 22 20 44.7748209648 -24 40 41.909518200 12.26 12.46 12.06 11.57   ~ 720 1
36 NGC 7550 LIN 23 15 16.0635618785 +18 57 41.255155052   13.9   11.85   ~ 133 1
37 MCG-01-60-021 LIN 23 41 47.285 -03 40 01.90 14.88 14.50 13.57     ~ 95 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2012MNRAS.422.2444S and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu