2012MNRAS.427..204D


Query : 2012MNRAS.427..204D

2012MNRAS.427..204D - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 427, 204-244 (2012/November-3)

Surface brightness and intrinsic luminosity of ellipticals.

DHAR B.K. and WILLIAMS L.L.R.

Abstract (from CDS):

We show that the surface brightness profiles of elliptical galaxies can be parametrized using a linear superposition of two or three components, each of which is described by functions developed in Dhar & Williams as the 2D projections of a 3D Einasto density profile. For a sample of 23 ellipticals in and around the Virgo Cluster with total absolute V magnitude -24 < M_VT_< -15, our multicomponent models span a dynamic range up to 106 in surface brightness and up to 105 in radius down to the resolution limit of the Hubble Space Telescope, have a median rms of 0.032 mag arcsec–2 consistent with the rms of 0.03 from random errors of the data, and are statistically justified at >3σ. Our models indicate that (i) the central component is more concentrated than the outer component; and (ii) the central component of massive shallow-cusp (`core') galaxies is much more luminous, extended and concentrated than that of steep-cusp (`cuspy') galaxies, with their near exponential central profiles indicating disc-like systems, whose existence must be verified spectroscopically.

Galaxy structure can thus be modelled extremely well with a central mass excess for all galaxies. This is not necessarily contrary to the notion of a mass deficit in `core' galaxies, since mass ejection due to core scouring by a supermassive black hole (SMBH) binary could have affected the shape of the central components. However, we show that the existence, amount, radial extent and sign of such deficits disagree substantially in the literature, both for a given galaxy and on an average over a sample. We discuss possible implications and suggest that SMBH binaries are unlikely to be the sole mechanism for producing the large `cores' of massive galaxies.

Using results from the SAURON survey, we deduce that under certain conditions of symmetry, inclination angles and degree of triaxiality, the intrinsic (3D) density of light can be well described with a multicomponent Einasto model for both steep- and shallow-cusp galaxies. This indicates a universality in the functional form describing the 3D density distribution of light in galaxies and dark matter in Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) N-body haloes. Finally, planetary nebulae and strong-lensing observations, and the Einasto index n of ΛCDM dark matter haloes, indicate that our result – the outer component of the surface brightness profiles of massive galaxies has 5 ≲ n ≲ 8 – could imply (i) a common feature of collisionless systems; and (ii) that galaxies with such n for their outer component are dark matter dominated.


Abstract Copyright: © 2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS

Journal keyword(s): gravitational lensing: strong - galaxies: fundamental parameters - galaxies: haloes - galaxies: photometry - galaxies: structure - dark matter

Simbad objects: 33

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 33
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 ACO 2984 ClG 02 11 25.1 -40 17 29           ~ 53 0
2 NGC 2986 EmG 09 44 16.0193679072 -21 16 40.971622512   11.60 10.93 9.96   ~ 171 0
3 NGC 4168 Sy2 12 12 17.2692381408 +13 12 18.688208724 12.58 12.11 11.18     ~ 393 1
4 NGC 4261 LIN 12 19 23.2160630 +05 49 29.700024   13.92 12.87     ~ 1290 0
5 NAME Coma I Group GrG 12 22 19.4 +29 53 47           ~ 112 0
6 NGC 4365 GiG 12 24 28.228 +07 19 03.07   11.5       ~ 871 0
7 M 84 Sy2 12 25 03.74333 +12 53 13.1393 12.67 12.09 10.49     ~ 1841 2
8 M 85 GiP 12 25 24.053 +18 11 27.89   10.2       ~ 678 0
9 NGC 4387 GiG 12 25 41.6768484264 +12 48 37.804615956 13.42 13.01 12.12   10.87 ~ 409 1
10 M 86 GiG 12 26 11.814 +12 56 45.49 10.32 9.83 8.90   7.50 ~ 1126 1
11 NGC 4434 GiG 12 27 36.6771662112 +08 09 15.640206876   13.2       ~ 275 0
12 NGC 4458 GiP 12 28 57.5613938232 +13 14 30.946545276 13.27 12.93 12.07     ~ 429 2
13 NGC 4459 H2G 12 29 00.0329905416 +13 58 42.826603332   11.6       ~ 567 0
14 NGC 4464 GiG 12 29 21.2937802368 +08 09 23.807609316   13.5       ~ 242 0
15 NGC 4467 GiG 12 29 30.2447376768 +07 59 34.273371336   15.2       ~ 187 0
16 LEDA 41180 AG? 12 29 34.9891966080 +08 03 28.781563608           ~ 91 0
17 M 49 Sy2 12 29 46.8 +08 00 01   13.21 12.17     ~ 2174 2
18 NGC 4473 GiG 12 29 48.878 +13 25 45.55 11.60 11.16 10.20     ~ 671 1
19 NGC 4478 GiP 12 30 17.4160005576 +12 19 42.790577160 12.82 12.36 11.45   10.17 ~ 508 1
20 NGC 4486B GiG 12 30 31.985 +12 29 24.85   14.5       ~ 428 0
21 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
22 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
23 NGC 4486A GiG 12 30 57.7095721176 +12 16 13.316512872   11.2 11.59 12.02   ~ 242 1
24 NGC 4487 EmG 12 31 04.4731449720 -08 03 14.548820040   11.7   11.9 11.6 ~ 189 0
25 NGC 4494 GiP 12 31 24.0391348536 +25 46 30.071664120   10.55 9.74     ~ 491 0
26 IC 798 GiG 12 32 33.4026417888 +15 24 55.432700280   15.3       ~ 108 0
27 NGC 4515 GiG 12 33 04.9652329656 +16 15 55.889535096   13.3       ~ 157 0
28 2MASX J12353723+1222554 GiP 12 35 37.2512550384 +12 22 55.234598772   15.41       ~ 103 0
29 NGC 4551 GiP 12 35 37.9542692328 +12 15 50.284593432 13.49 12.97 12.02     ~ 371 1
30 M 89 Sy2 12 35 39.80733343 +12 33 22.8308657 11.29 10.73 9.75     ~ 1037 2
31 M 59 GiG 12 42 02.2581375168 +11 38 48.909507756   11.0       ~ 721 0
32 NGC 4636 LIN 12 42 49.8333280080 +02 41 15.951929028   12.62 11.84     ~ 1156 1
33 M 60 GiC 12 43 39.9708251934 +11 33 09.688174067   10.3       ~ 1395 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2012MNRAS.427..204D and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu