2013ApJ...766...32B


Query : 2013ApJ...766...32B

2013ApJ...766...32B - Astrophys. J., 766, 32 (2013/March-3)

Dark matter halo profiles of massive clusters: theory versus observations.

BHATTACHARYA S., HABIB S., HEITMANN K. and VIKHLININ A.

Abstract (from CDS):

Dark-matter-dominated cluster-scale halos act as an important cosmological probe and provide a key testing ground for structure formation theory. Focusing on their mass profiles, we have carried out (gravity-only) simulations of the concordance ΛCDM cosmology, covering a mass range of 2x1012 to 2x1015 h–1 M☉ and a redshift range of z = 0-2, while satisfying the associated requirements of resolution and statistical control. When fitting to the Navarro-Frenk-White profile, our concentration-mass (c-M) relation differs in normalization and shape in comparison to previous studies that have limited statistics in the upper end of the mass range. We show that the flattening of the c-M relation with redshift is naturally expressed if c is viewed as a function of the peak height parameter, ν. Unlike the c-M relation, the slope of the c-ν relation is effectively constant over the redshift range z = 0-2, while the amplitude varies by ∼30% for massive clusters. This relation is, however, not universal: using a simulation suite covering the allowed wCDM parameter space, we show that the c-ν relation varies by about ±20% as cosmological parameters are varied. At fixed mass, the c(M) distribution is well fit by a Gaussian with σc/ < c > ≃ 1/3, independent of the radius at which the concentration is defined, the halo dynamical state, and the underlying cosmology. We compare the ΛCDM predictions with observations of halo concentrations from strong lensing, weak lensing, galaxy kinematics, and X-ray data, finding good agreement for massive clusters (Mvir> 4x1014 h–1 M☉), but with some disagreements at lower masses. Because of uncertainty in observational systematics and modeling of baryonic physics, the significance of these discrepancies remains unclear.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: clusters: general - galaxies: halos - methods: numerical

CDS comments: Sources cl1159 and rxj1504 in table 5 are not identified.

Simbad objects: 18

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 18
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 ACO 2717 ClG 00 03 12.9 -35 56 13           ~ 146 0
2 ACO 133 ClG 01 02 41.5 -21 52 53           ~ 391 1
3 ACO 262 ClG 01 52 50.4 +36 08 46           ~ 727 1
4 ACO 383 ClG 02 48 03.3915 -03 31 45.228           ~ 389 0
5 ACO 3112 ClG 03 17 52.9 -44 15 06           ~ 329 1
6 ACO 478 ClG 04 13 24.8 +10 27 52           ~ 522 0
7 ACO 907 ClG 09 58 21.84 -11 03 47.5           ~ 137 0
8 ACO 1413 ClG 11 55 12.87 +23 23 46.9           ~ 456 0
9 NAME NGC 4073 Group GrG 12 04 44.08 +01 48 40.9     13.53     ~ 292 0
10 ACO 1650 ClG 12 58 42.0 -01 45 45           ~ 325 0
11 ACO 1689 ClG 13 11 29.5 -01 20 28           ~ 1178 0
12 ACO 1795 ClG 13 48 47.4 +26 34 55           ~ 1330 0
13 ACO 1835 ClG 14 01 02.07 +02 52 43.2           ~ 727 1
14 ACO 1991 ClG 14 54 41.53 +18 38 08.4           ~ 349 1
15 ACO 2029 ClG 15 10 54.2 +05 44 23           ~ 1020 0
16 ACO 2107 ClG 15 39 39.04 +21 46 57.8           ~ 270 0
17 ACO 2390 ClG 21 53 37.4 +17 41 46           ~ 732 2
18 ACO 4059 ClG 23 57 02.2 -34 45 58           ~ 400 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2013ApJ...766...32B and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu