2013MNRAS.432.3534H -
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 432, 3534-3543 (2013/July-2)
Mapping the core mass function on to the stellar initial mass function: multiplicity matters.
HOLMAN K., WALCH S.K., GOODWIN S.P. and WHITWORTH A.P.
Abstract (from CDS):
Observations indicate that the central portions of the present-day prestellar core mass function (hereafter CMF) and the stellar initial mass function (hereafter IMF) both have approximately log-normal shapes, but that the CMF is displaced to higher mass than the IMF by a factor F ∼ 4±1. This has led to suggestions that the shape of the IMF is directly inherited from the shape of the CMF - and therefore, by implication, that there is a self-similar mapping from the CMF on to the IMF. If we assume a self-similar mapping, it follows (i) that F = NO/η, where η is the mean fraction of a core's mass that ends up in stars and NO is the mean number of stars spawned by a single core; and (ii) that the stars spawned by a single core must have an approximately log-normal distribution of relative masses, with universal standard deviation σO. Observations can be expected to deliver ever more accurate estimates of F, but this still leaves a degeneracy between η and NO, and σO is also unconstrained by observation. Here we show that these parameters can be estimated by invoking binary statistics. Specifically, if (a) each core spawns one long-lived binary system, and (b) the probability that a star of mass M is part of this long-lived binary is proportional to Mα, current observations of the binary frequency as a function of primary mass, b(M1), and the distribution of mass ratios, pq, strongly favour η ∼ 1.0±0.3, NO ∼ 4.3{x000B1} 0.4, σO ∼ 0.3±0.03 and α ∼ 0.9±0.6; η > 1 just means that, between when its mass is measured and when it finishes spawning stars, a core accretes additional mass, for example from the filament in which it is embedded. If not all cores spawn a long-lived binary system, db/dM1 < 0, in strong disagreement with observation; conversely, if a core typically spawns more than one long-lived binary system, then NO and η have to be increased further. The mapping from CMF to IMF is not necessarily self-similar - there are many possible motivations for a non-self-similar mapping - but if it is not, then the shape of the IMF cannot be inherited from the CMF. Given the limited observational constraints currently available and the ability of a self-similar mapping to satisfy them, the possibility that the shape of the IMF is inherited from the CMF cannot be ruled out at this juncture.
To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2013MNRAS.432.3534H and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu