2014ApJ...785L..28E


Query : 2014ApJ...785L..28E

2014ApJ...785L..28E - Astrophys. J., 785, L28 (2014/April-3)

Testing the asteroseismic mass scale using metal-poor stars characterized with APOGEE and Kepler.

EPSTEIN C.R., ELSWORTH Y.P., JOHNSON J.A., SHETRONE M., MOSSER B., HEKKER S., TAYAR J., HARDING P., PINSONNEAULT M., SILVA AGUIRRE V., BASU S., BEERS T.C., BIZYAEV D., BEDDING T.R., CHAPLIN W.J., FRINCHABOY P.M., GARCIA R.A., GARCIA PEREZ A.E., HEARTY F.R., HUBER D., IVANS I.I., MAJEWSKI S.R., MATHUR S., NIDEVER D., SERENELLI A., SCHIAVON R.P., SCHNEIDER D.P., SCHONRICH R., SOBECK J.S., STASSUN K.G., STELLO D. and ZASOWSKI G.

Abstract (from CDS):

Fundamental stellar properties, such as mass, radius, and age, can be inferred using asteroseismology. Cool stars with convective envelopes have turbulent motions that can stochastically drive and damp pulsations. The properties of the oscillation frequency power spectrum can be tied to mass and radius through solar-scaled asteroseismic relations. Stellar properties derived using these scaling relations need verification over a range of metallicities. Because the age and mass of halo stars are well-constrained by astrophysical priors, they provide an independent, empirical check on asteroseismic mass estimates in the low-metallicity regime. We identify nine metal-poor red giants (including six stars that are kinematically associated with the halo) from a sample observed by both the Kepler space telescope and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III APOGEE spectroscopic survey. We compare masses inferred using asteroseismology to those expected for halo and thick-disk stars. Although our sample is small, standard scaling relations, combined with asteroseismic parameters from the APOKASC Catalog, produce masses that are systematically higher (<ΔM > =0.17±0.05 M☉) than astrophysical expectations. The magnitude of the mass discrepancy is reduced by known theoretical corrections to the measured large frequency separation scaling relationship. Using alternative methods for measuring asteroseismic parameters induces systematic shifts at the 0.04 M☉level. We also compare published asteroseismic analyses with scaling relationship masses to examine the impact of using the frequency of maximum power as a constraint. Upcoming APOKASC observations will provide a larger sample of ∼100 metal-poor stars, important for detailed asteroseismic characterization of Galactic stellar populations.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): asteroseismology - Galaxy: halo - stars: fundamental parameters

Simbad objects: 13

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 13
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 104 GlC 00 24 05.359 -72 04 53.20     4.09     ~ 4158 0
2 BD+42 3187 RG* 18 54 16.9544655840 +42 59 00.384912816   10.495 9.939 10.086   G2 101 0
3 2MASS J18593517+3926488 RG* 18 59 35.1714683304 +39 26 48.896419380           G6IV 35 0
4 TYC 3124-2345-1 RG* 19 01 13.9637622744 +41 09 06.025364748   12.13 11.73     G2V 40 0
5 2MASS J19025811+4251431 RG* 19 02 58.1123511168 +42 51 43.186448988           ~ 34 0
6 2MASS J19071107+4231237 RG* 19 07 11.0718029400 +42 31 23.776450464           G3V 25 0
7 2MASS J19074933+4849248 RG* 19 07 49.3492906320 +48 49 24.931900668           ~ 28 0
8 TYC 3132-1803-1 RG* 19 08 41.6304756240 +43 52 10.322923008   11.91 11.14     ~ 29 0
9 TYC 3129-1563-1 RG* 19 16 07.6456941936 +42 46 32.004554412   13.40 12.20     F8IV 35 0
10 NGC 6791 OpC 19 20 52.8 +37 46 40   10.52 9.5     ~ 1120 0
11 TYC 3564-1597-1 RG* 19 36 52.2054153288 +49 35 59.382765708   12.25 11.34     ~ 34 0
12 TYC 3564-630-1 RG* 19 37 12.0103216392 +50 24 55.585764540   11.27 10.44     G0 29 0
13 * nu. Ind ** 22 24 36.8853892493 -72 15 19.488237466   5.94 5.29     G9VFe-3.1CH-1.5 290 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2014ApJ...785L..28E and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu