2014MNRAS.438..494R


Query : 2014MNRAS.438..494R

2014MNRAS.438..494R - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 438, 494-512 (2014/February-2)

A wide search for obscured active galactic nuclei using XMM-Newton and WISE.

ROVILOS E., GEORGANTOPOULOS I., AKYLAS A., AIRD J., ALEXANDER D.M., COMASTRI A., DEL MORO A., GANDHI P., GEORGAKAKIS A., HARRISON C.M. and MULLANEY J.R.

Abstract (from CDS):

Heavily obscured and Compton-thick active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are missing even in the deepest X-ray surveys, and indirect methods are required to detect them. Here we use a combination of the XMM-Newton serendipitous X-ray survey with the optical Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), and the infrared WISE all-sky survey in order to check the efficiency of the low X-ray-to-infrared luminosity selection method in finding heavily obscured AGNs. We select the sources which are detected in the hard X-ray band (2-8keV), and also have a redshift determination (photometric or spectroscopic) in the SDSS catalogue. We match this sample with the WISE catalogue, and fit the spectral energy distributions of the 2844 sources which have three, or more, photometric data points in the infrared. We then select the heavily obscured AGN candidates by comparing their 12µm luminosity to the observed 2-10keV X-ray luminosity and the intrinsic relation between the X-ray and the mid-infrared luminosities. With this approach, we find 20 candidate heavily obscured AGNs and we then examine their X-ray and optical spectra. Of the 20 initial candidates, we find nine (64 percent; out of the 14, for which X-ray spectra could be fitted) based on the X-ray spectra, and seven (78 percent; out of the nine detected spectroscopically in the SDSS) based on the [Oiii] line fluxes. Combining all criteria, we determine the final number of heavily obscured AGNs to be 12-19, and the number of Compton-thick AGNs to be 2-5, showing that the method is reliable in finding obscured AGNs, but not Compton thick. However, those numbers are smaller than what would be expected from X-ray background population synthesis models, which demonstrates how the optical-infrared selection and the scatter of the Lx-LMIR relation limit the efficiency of the method. Finally, we test popular obscured AGN selection methods based on mid-infrared colours, and find that the probability of an AGN to be selected by its mid-infrared colours increases with the X-ray luminosity. The (observed) X-ray luminosities of heavily obscured AGNs are relatively low (L_2-10 keV<10^44 erg s^-1), even though most of them are located in the `quasi stellar object (QSO) locus'. However, a selection scheme based on a relatively low X-ray luminosity and mid-infrared colours characteristic of QSOs would not select ∼ 25 percent of the heavily obscured AGNs of our sample.

Abstract Copyright: © 2013 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society (2013)

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: active - infrared: galaxies - X-rays: galaxies

Simbad objects: 28

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 28
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 424 Sy1 01 11 27.6385025496 -38 05 00.421096524   13.76 14.12 12.38 12.8 ~ 346 1
2 M 77 Sy2 02 42 40.7091669408 -00 00 47.859690204 9.70 9.61 8.87 10.1 9.9 ~ 4897 2
3 NAME Chandra Deep Field-South reg 03 32 28.0 -27 48 30           ~ 2282 1
4 Z 329-24 Sy2 06 15 36.2812259376 +71 02 14.837219808 14.21 14.03 12.97     ~ 960 2
5 [VV2006] J073502.3+265911 QSO 07 35 02.3058158496 +26 59 11.534990964   17.01 16.68     ~ 40 0
6 2MASS J07582096+3923358 Sy2 07 58 20.9764299480 +39 23 35.956688136   19.02 18.49     ~ 17 0
7 FIRST J082501.4+300257 rG 08 25 01.4788976846 +30 02 57.310706050           ~ 3 0
8 SDSS J090959.60+542340.3 QSO 09 09 59.5977119544 +54 23 40.346645352           ~ 12 0
9 2MASSI J0918486+211717 Sy1 09 18 48.6116628720 +21 17 17.070127044   18.72 17.94     ~ 47 0
10 MCG-04-23-008 Sy2 09 34 43.5460992984 -21 55 39.858501396   13.65 13.66 11.47   ~ 75 0
11 Z 289-11 Sy2 09 35 51.6045544584 +61 21 11.589382368   15.20 15.50     ~ 617 2
12 US 796 QSO 09 38 57.0175740480 +41 28 21.216772452   16.94 16.75     ~ 144 1
13 [VV2006] J094021.1+033145 QSO 09 40 21.1202724648 +03 31 44.805534672   16.75 16.46     ~ 27 0
14 SDSS J104426.70+063753.8 Sy2 10 44 26.706 +06 37 53.84   20.58 19.71     ~ 10 0
15 2XMM J111847.0+075419 Sy1 11 18 47.0117455272 +07 54 19.501185240           ~ 8 0
16 LEDA 3096047 Sy2 11 26 11.6323760328 +42 52 46.516544616   18.61 18.13     ~ 34 0
17 Mrk 176 Sy2 11 32 40.2448971432 +52 57 01.289256768   15.50 14.61 13.52   ~ 244 1
18 2MASX J12183945+4706275 Sy2 12 18 39.4130008968 +47 06 27.676476108   21.68 20.49     ~ 45 0
19 SDSS J124410.21+164748.2 AG? 12 44 10.213 +16 47 48.29           ~ 1 0
20 NGC 4945 Sy2 13 05 27.279 -49 28 04.44   9.31 14.40 7.55   ~ 1582 2
21 2XMM J132415.9+655337 AG? 13 24 15.9051330408 +65 53 37.810351068           ~ 2 0
22 [VV2006] J132827.1+581836 QSO 13 28 27.0686827248 +58 18 36.913458960   18.67 18.67     ~ 42 0
23 SDSS J133332.15+503518.9 AG? 13 33 32.155 +50 35 18.90           ~ 3 0
24 2XMM J133756.9+043325 AG? 13 37 56.9 +04 33 25           ~ 1 0
25 Mrk 668 BLL 14 07 00.39441712 +28 27 14.6901341   16.13 15.35 10.29   ~ 826 3
26 QSO J1415+1129 QSO 14 15 46.25 +11 29 43.4   17.63 17.23     ~ 678 0
27 NGC 6240 Sy2 16 52 58.9 +02 24 03   14.31 13.37     ~ 1734 2
28 NGC 7582 Sy2 23 18 23.60 -42 22 13.3 11.62 10.92 10.62     ~ 978 3

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2014MNRAS.438..494R and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu