2015A&A...573A.110G


Query : 2015A&A...573A.110G

2015A&A...573A.110G - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 573A110-110 (2015/1-1)

Lower mass normalization of the stellar initial mass function for dense massive early-type galaxies at z ∼ 1.4.

GARGIULO A., SARACCO P., LONGHETTI M., TAMBURRI S., LONOCE I. and CIOCCA F.

Abstract (from CDS):

This paper aims at understanding whether the normalization of the stellar initial mass function (IMF) of massive galaxies varies with cosmic time and/or with mean stellar mass density Σ=M*/(2πRe2). We have tackled this question by taking advantage of a spectroscopic sample of 18 dense (Σ>2500M☉/pc2) massive early-type galaxies (ETGs) that we collected at 1.2≲z≲1.6. Each galaxy in the sample was selected in order to have available: i) a high-resolution deep HST-F160W image to visually classify it as an ETG; ii) an accurate velocity dispersion estimate; iii) stellar mass derived through the fit of multiband photometry; and iv) structural parameters (i.e. effective radius Re and Sersic index n) derived in the F160W-band. We have constrained the mass-normalization of the IMF of dense high-z ETGs by comparing the true stellar masses of the ETGs in the sample (Mtrue) derived through virial theorem, hence IMF independent, with those inferred through the fit of the photometry which assume a reference IMF (Mref). Adopting the virial estimator as proxy of the true stellar mass, we have implicitly assumed that these systems have zero dark matter. However, recent dynamical analysis of massive local ETGs have shown that the dark matter fraction within Re in dense ETGs is negligible (<5-10%) and simulations of dissipationless mergers of spheroidal galaxies have shown that this fraction decreases going back with time. Accurate dynamical models of local ETGs performed by the ATLAS3D team have shown that the virial estimator is prone to underestimating or overestimating the total masses. We have considered this, and based on the results of ATLAS3D we have shown that for dense ETGs the mean value of total masses derived through the virial estimator with a non-homologous virial coefficient and Sersic-Re are perfectly in agreement with the mean value of those derived through more sophisticated dynamical models, although, of course, the estimates show higher uncertainties. Tracing the variation of the parameter Γ=Mtrue/Mref with velocity dispersion σe, we have found that, on average, dense ETGs at <z> =1.4 follow the same IMF-σe trend of typical local ETGs, but with a lower mass-normalization. The observed lower normalization could be evidence of i) an evolution of the IMF with time or ii) a correlation with Σ. To discriminate between the two possibilities, we have compared the IMF-σe trend that we have found for high-z dense ETGs with that of local ETGs with similar mean stellar mass density and velocity dispersion and we have found that the IMF of massive dense ETGs does not depend on redshift. The similarity between the IMF-σe trends observed both in dense high-z and low-z ETGs over 9Gyr of evolution and their lower mass-normalization with respect to the mean value of local ETGs suggests that, independently of formation redshift, the physical conditions which characterized the formation of a dense spheroid on average lead to a mass spectrum of newly formed stars with a higher ratio of high- to low-mass stars with respect to the IMF of normal local ETGs. In the direction of our findings, recent hydrodynamical simulations show that the higher star-formation rate that should have characterized the early stage of star formation of dense ETGs is expected to inhibit the formation of low-mass stars. Hence, compact ETGs should have higher ratio of high- to low-mass stars than normal spheroids, as we observe.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: formation - galaxies: high-redshift - galaxies: stellar content

Simbad objects: 19

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 19
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 MUNICS S2F1 389 G 03 06 28.03 +00 00 31.6   24.3 23.7     ~ 10 0
2 MUNICS S2F1 511 G 03 06 34.04 +00 02 30.9     25.4     ~ 10 0
3 MUNICS S2F1 633 G 03 06 35.10 +00 04 43.6   25.5 25.8     ~ 10 0
4 MUNICS S2F1 142 G 03 06 36.51 -00 03 01.0     24.7     ~ 11 0
5 MUNICS S2F1 527 G 03 06 43.34 +00 02 44.8           ~ 7 0
6 NAME GOODS Southern Field reg 03 32 28.0 -27 48 30           ~ 1623 1
7 GMASS 2239 G 03 32 31.316 -27 43 16.17   27.7     24.9283 ~ 20 0
8 [LBX2017] 637 AGN 03 32 34.114 -27 42 40.48   28.1981     26.7033 ~ 19 0
9 GNS 7694 EmG 03 32 43.143 -27 42 42.05   26.7966   24.8724 21.148 ~ 23 0
10 COSMOS2015 808373 G 09 59 18.650 +02 31 39.04           ~ 4 0
11 ACS-GC 20118567 AGN 10 00 15.39 +02 25 04.4   25.702 25.456   23.359 ~ 20 0
12 COSMOS2015 726965 G 10 00 17.30 +02 24 00.5   27.395 26.442 25.62 24.43 ~ 10 0
13 CANDELS COSMOS F160W J100024.18+021220.8 G 10 00 24.18 +02 12 20.9   26.581 26.038 24.78 23.35 ~ 12 0
14 CANDELS COSMOS F160W J100035.08+022227.3 G 10 00 35.09 +02 22 27.4 24.63 24.38 24.00 23.66 22.84 ~ 15 0
15 NMBS C21434 G 10 00 36.100 +02 32 13.78           ~ 5 0
16 SHARDS J123615.21+620944.5 G 12 36 15.2138 +62 09 44.784 28.57 26.1949 25.41   23.4236 ~ 15 0
17 CANDELS EGS F160W J141826.4+524307.6 G 14 18 26.44 +52 43 07.7           ~ 7 0
18 NMBS A17300 * 14 18 39.7785353016 +52 41 59.583894504           ~ 4 0
19 NMBS A21129 G 14 19 10.568 +52 46 26.79           ~ 4 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2015A&A...573A.110G and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu