2015MNRAS.451.3815A


Query : 2015MNRAS.451.3815A

2015MNRAS.451.3815A - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 451, 3815-3835 (2015/August-3)

H-ATLAS/GAMA and HeViCS - dusty early-type galaxies in different environments.

AGIUS N.K., DI SEREGO ALIGHIERI S., VIAENE S., BAES M., SANSOM A.E., BOURNE N., BLAND-HAWTHORN J., BROUGH S., DAVIS T.A., DE LOOZE I., DRIVER S.P., DUNNE L., DYE S., EALES S.A., HUGHES T.M., IVISON R.J., KELVIN L.S., MADDOX S., MAHAJAN S., PAPPALARDO C., ROBOTHAM A.S.G., ROWLANDS K., TEMI P. and VALIANTE E.

Abstract (from CDS):

The Herschel Space Observatory has had a tremendous impact on the study of extragalactic dust. Specifically, early-type galaxies (ETG) have been the focus of several studies. In this paper, we combine results from two Herschel studies - a Virgo cluster study Herschel Virgo Cluster Survey (HeViCS) and a broader, low-redshift Herschel-Astrophysical Terahertz Large Area Survey (H-ATLAS)/Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) study - and contrast the dust and associated properties for similar mass galaxies. This comparison is motivated by differences in results exhibited between multiple Herschel studies of ETG. A comparison between consistent modified blackbody derived dust mass is carried out, revealing strong differences between the two samples in both dust mass and dust-to-stellar mass ratio. In particular, the HeViCS sample lacks massive ETG with as high a specific dust content as found in H-ATLAS. This is most likely connected with the difference in environment for the two samples. We calculate nearest neighbour environment densities in a consistent way, showing that H-ATLAS ETG occupy sparser regions of the local Universe, whereas HeViCS ETG occupy dense regions. This is also true for ETG that are not Herschel-detected but are in the Virgo and GAMA parent samples. Spectral energy distributions are fit to the panchromatic data. From these, we find that in H-ATLAS the specific star formation rate anticorrelates with stellar mass and reaches values as high as in our Galaxy. On the other hand HeViCS ETG appear to have little star formation. Based on the trends found here, H-ATLAS ETG are thought to have more extended star formation histories and a younger stellar population than HeViCS ETG.

Abstract Copyright: © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society (2015)

Journal keyword(s): methods: statistical - galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD - galaxies: evolution - submillimetre: galaxies

Simbad objects: 34

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 34
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 4191 LIN 12 13 50.4023369592 +07 12 03.219957216   13.9       ~ 122 0
2 NGC 4233 GiG 12 17 07.690 +07 37 27.96   13.2       ~ 174 0
3 Z 41-72 GiG 12 18 06.8047552560 +05 41 04.178963292   15.3       ~ 26 0
4 Z 41-75 GiG 12 18 14.462 +06 36 14.27   15.5       ~ 27 0
5 NGC 4255 GiG 12 18 56.1463134360 +04 47 10.064149440   13.5       ~ 108 0
6 Z 42-9 GiG 12 19 12.3811843272 +06 22 53.711992812   15.2       ~ 26 0
7 NGC 4261 LIN 12 19 23.2160630 +05 49 29.700024   13.92 12.87     ~ 1290 0
8 NGC 4281 GiG 12 20 21.5246429784 +05 23 11.188759092   12.5       ~ 195 0
9 NGC 4282 GiG 12 20 24.2894876304 +05 34 22.162152252   14.7       ~ 37 0
10 LEDA 39889 AG? 12 21 03.6430303944 +07 04 39.677098260           ~ 23 0
11 NGC 4292 LIN 12 21 16.4580185256 +04 35 44.558066724 13.49 13.09 12.21     ~ 102 1
12 Z 42-42 GiG 12 21 34.0789476672 +04 46 46.246202508   14.64       ~ 57 1
13 IC 782 GiG 12 21 36.9678660552 +05 45 56.821050468   15.1       ~ 62 0
14 Z 42-58 GiG 12 22 41.1481852272 +07 57 01.205409312   15.3       ~ 66 0
15 NGC 4341 GiP 12 23 53.471 +07 06 26.16   14.5       ~ 75 0
16 NGC 4350 GiP 12 23 57.814 +16 41 36.08   11.5 11.08     ~ 331 0
17 NGC 4370 GiG 12 24 54.932 +07 26 40.44 16.09 15.59 13.84     ~ 148 0
18 M 84 Sy2 12 25 03.74333 +12 53 13.1393 12.67 12.09 10.49     ~ 1841 2
19 IC 3303 GiG 12 25 15.1991817360 +12 42 52.784461080   15.1 14.24   13.29 ~ 80 0
20 M 86 GiG 12 26 11.814 +12 56 45.49 10.32 9.83 8.90   7.50 ~ 1126 1
21 IC 3358 GiG 12 26 54.423 +11 39 48.84   14.28 13.52   12.30 ~ 79 1
22 NGC 4429 GiG 12 27 26.5040002440 +11 06 27.588767616   11.4       ~ 348 0
23 NGC 4435 GiG 12 27 40.503 +13 04 44.48 12.23 11.74 10.80     ~ 474 2
24 NGC 4459 H2G 12 29 00.0329905416 +13 58 42.826603332   11.6       ~ 567 0
25 M 49 Sy2 12 29 46.8 +08 00 01   13.21 12.17     ~ 2174 2
26 NGC 4476 GiG 12 29 59.0772974472 +12 20 55.292203464 13.28 13.01 12.19     ~ 340 1
27 NGC 4477 Sy2 12 30 02.1955766304 +13 38 11.543715888 11.98 11.38 10.42     ~ 419 2
28 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
29 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
30 NGC 4486A GiG 12 30 57.7095721176 +12 16 13.316512872   11.2 11.59 12.02   ~ 242 1
31 NGC 4526 GiC 12 34 03.02853 +07 41 56.9040   10.6       ~ 707 0
32 IC 3540 GiC 12 35 27.2277280584 +12 45 00.945699012   14.8       ~ 68 0
33 NGC 4550 GiP 12 35 30.5913588048 +12 13 14.921166792 12.97 12.56 11.68     ~ 558 1
34 M 89 Sy2 12 35 39.80733343 +12 33 22.8308657 11.29 10.73 9.75     ~ 1037 2

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2015MNRAS.451.3815A and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu