2016A&A...591A..49C


Query : 2016A&A...591A..49C

2016A&A...591A..49C - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 591A49-49 (2016/7-1)

Deep MUSE observations in the HDFS. Morpho-kinematics of distant star-forming galaxies down to 108M.

CONTINI T., EPINAT B., BOUCHE N., BRINCHMANN J., BOOGAARD L.A., VENTOU E., BACON R., RICHARD J., WEILBACHER P.M., WISOTZKI L., KRAJNOVIC D., VIELFAURE J.-B., EMSELLEM E., FINLEY H., INAMI H., SCHAYE J., SWINBANK M., GUEROU A., MARTINSSON T., MICHEL-DANSAC L., SCHROETTER I., SHIRAZI M. and SOUCAIL G.

Abstract (from CDS):

Aims. Whereas the evolution of gas kinematics of massive galaxies is now relatively well established up to redshift z∼3, little is known about the kinematics of lower mass (M*<=1010M☉) galaxies. We use MUSE, a powerful wide-field, optical integral-field spectrograph (IFS) recently mounted on the VLT, to characterize this galaxy population at intermediate redshift.
Methods. We made use of the deepest MUSE observations performed so far on the Hubble Deep Field South (HDFS). This data cube, resulting from 27 h of integration time, covers a one arcmin2 field of view at an unprecedented depth (with a 1σ emission-line surface brightness limit of 1x10–19erg/s/cm2/arcsec2) and a final spatial resolution of ≃0.7". We identified a sample of 28 resolved emission-line galaxies, extending over an area that is at least twice the seeing disk, spread over a redshift interval of 0.2<z<1.4. More than half of the galaxies are at z∼0.3-0.7, which is a redshift range poorly studied so far with IFS kinematics. We used the public HST images and multiband photometry over the HDFS to constrain the stellar mass and star formation rate (SFR) of the galaxies and to perform a morphological analysis using GALFIT, providing estimates of the disk inclination, disk scale length, and position angle of the major axis. We derived the resolved ionized gas properties of these galaxies from the MUSE data and model the disk (both in 2D and in 3D with GALPAK3D) to retrieve their intrinsic gas kinematics, including the maximum rotation velocity and velocity dispersion.
Results. We build a sample of resolved emission-line galaxies of much lower stellar mass and SFR (by ∼1-2 orders of magnitude) than previous IFS surveys. The gas kinematics of most of the spatially resolved MUSE-HDFS galaxies is consistent with disk-like rotation, but about 20% have velocity dispersions that are larger than the rotation velocities and 30% are part of a close pair and/or show clear signs of recent gravitational interactions. These fractions are similar to what has been found in previous IFS surveys of more massive galaxies, indicating that the dynamical state of the ionized gas and the level of gravitational interactions of star-forming galaxies is not a strong function of their stellar mass. In the high-mass regime, the MUSE-HDFS galaxies follow the Tully-Fisher relation defined from previous IFS surveys in a similar redshift range. This scaling relation also extends to lower masses/velocities but with a higher dispersion. We find that 90% of the MUSE-HDFS galaxies with stellar masses below 109.5M☉ have settled gas disks. The MUSE-HDFS galaxies follow the scaling relations defined in the local Universe between the specific angular momentum and stellar mass. However, we find that intermediate-redshift, star-forming galaxies fill a continuum transition from the spiral to elliptical local scaling relations, according to the dynamical state (i.e., rotation- or dispersion-dominated) of the gas. This indicates that some galaxies may lose their angular momentum and become dispersion-dominated prior to becoming passive.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO, 2016

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: evolution - galaxies: high-redshift - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

Simbad objects: 35

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 35
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 33 GiG 01 33 50.8965749232 +30 39 36.630403128 6.17 6.27 5.72     ~ 6226 1
2 M 81 Sy2 09 55 33.1726556496 +69 03 55.062505368   7.89 6.94     ~ 4725 3
3 M 83 SBG 13 37 00.91920 -29 51 56.7400 8.85 8.11 7.52 7.21   ~ 2778 2
4 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 Ks 1 526 G 22 32 51.5550 -60 33 37.445     22.94   22.08 ~ 14 0
5 [LFR2003] 314 G 22 32 52.1962 -60 33 23.784 24.762 23.858 23.514   22.83 ~ 14 0
6 [LFR2003] 99 PaG 22 32 52.2186 -60 33 59.379 24.932 24.092 23.073   21.78 ~ 16 0
7 HDFS J223252.25-603319.5 G 22 32 52.2955 -60 33 19.255 25.191 24.759 24.198   23.79 ~ 11 0
8 [LFR2003] 91 G 22 32 52.3115 -60 34 02.675 24.838 24.052 23.077   21.97 ~ 16 0
9 [LFR2003] 270 G 22 32 52.3960 -60 33 32.877 24.601 24.125 23.370   22.72 ~ 15 0
10 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 Ks 1 492 G 22 32 53.0627 -60 33 28.386 25.098 24.436 23.775 23.84 22.56 ~ 21 0
11 [LFR2003] 264 G 22 32 53.3376 -60 33 34.714 30.763 28.804 27.881   26.18 ~ 8 0
12 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 H 1 813 G 22 32 53.4440 -60 33 33.058 26.053 25.631 25.059   23.75 ~ 13 0
13 [BBR2015] 72 G 22 32 53.640 -60 33 55.03     25.86   25.34 ~ 2 0
14 [LFR2003] 203 G 22 32 53.740 -60 33 50.70 27.279 26.778 26.751   25.29 ~ 6 0
15 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 H 1 850 G 22 32 53.7848 -60 33 37.326 24.183 23.598 22.859   21.52 ~ 18 0
16 [LFR2003] 159 G 22 32 53.880 -60 34 00.26   27.650 27.309   26.51 ~ 6 0
17 [LFR2003] 136 G 22 32 53.890 -60 34 02.01 27.005 26.210 25.880   24.84 ~ 5 0
18 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 H 1 859 G 22 32 54.0513 -60 33 41.275 26.137 26.032 25.159   24.15 ~ 11 0
19 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 Ks 1 475 G 22 32 54.3444 -60 33 20.419     24.47   23.94 ~ 10 0
20 [LFR2003] 244 G 22 32 54.7236 -60 33 33.009 24.331 22.839 22.054   21.22 ~ 13 0
21 [LFR2003] 64 G 22 32 55.220 -60 34 10.15 25.731 24.923 24.526   23.42 ~ 11 0
22 [LFR2003] 75 G 22 32 55.250 -60 34 07.50 25.022 24.641 23.987   22.87 ~ 13 0
23 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 J 1 839 G 22 32 55.7460 -60 33 33.618 26.002 25.424 24.889   23.42 ~ 15 0
24 [LFR2003] 283 G 22 32 55.8511 -60 33 30.308 26.464 25.149 24.436   23.67 ~ 10 0
25 [LFR2003] 476 G 22 32 55.8865 -60 33 17.580 25.014 24.423 23.706   22.93 ~ 12 0
26 NAME HDF-S reg 22 32 56 -60 33.0           ~ 580 0
27 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 Ks 1 652 G 22 32 56.080 -60 34 14.17 24.041 23.482 22.835   22.08 ~ 21 0
28 [LFR2003] 315 G 22 32 56.680 -60 33 27.54 27.596 27.010 27.135   25.76 ~ 7 0
29 [LFR2003] 317 G 22 32 57.060 -60 33 23.03 24.315 23.929 23.565   22.79 ~ 9 0
30 [LFR2003] 189 G 22 32 57.9468 -60 33 49.013 25.442 25.093 24.150   23.06 ~ 11 0
31 EIS-DEEP HDFS-2 H 1 801 G 22 32 58.2471 -60 33 31.505 24.480 23.815 22.939   21.98 ~ 18 0
32 HDFS J223258.67-603327.1 G 22 32 58.680 -60 33 27.09 28.988 28.196 27.157   25.98 ~ 7 0
33 [LFR2003] 227 G 22 32 59.4695 -60 33 39.586 24.521 23.828 22.988   21.99 ~ 14 0
34 [LFR2003] 301 G 22 32 59.4804 -60 33 28.793 25.814 25.144 24.926   24.19 ~ 9 0
35 [LFR2003] 163 G 22 32 59.5089 -60 33 56.010 26.333 25.859 25.677   24.41 ~ 7 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2016A&A...591A..49C and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu