2016ApJ...817...76M


Query : 2016ApJ...817...76M

2016ApJ...817...76M - Astrophys. J., 817, 76 (2016/January-3)

Variations of the ISM compactness across the main sequence of star forming galaxies: observations and simulations.

MARTINEZ-GALARZA J.R., SMITH H.A., LANZ L., HAYWARD C.C., ZEZAS A., ROSENTHAL L., WEINER A., HUNG C., ASHBY M.L.N. and GROVES B.

Abstract (from CDS):

The majority of star-forming galaxies follow a simple empirical correlation in the star formation rate (SFR) versus stellar mass (M*) plane, of the form SFR∝ M*α, usually referred to as the star formation main sequence (MS). The physics that sets the properties of the MS is currently a subject of debate, and no consensus has been reached regarding the fundamental difference between members of the sequence and its outliers. Here we combine a set of hydro-dynamical simulations of interacting galactic disks with state-of-the-art radiative transfer codes to analyze how the evolution of mergers is reflected upon the properties of the MS. We present Chiburst, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo spectral energy distribution (SED) code that fits the multi-wavelength, broad-band photometry of galaxies and derives stellar masses, SFRs, and geometrical properties of the dust distribution. We apply this tool to the SEDs of simulated mergers and compare the derived results with the reference output from the simulations. Our results indicate that changes in the SEDs of mergers as they approach coalescence and depart from the MS are related to an evolution of dust geometry in scales larger than a few hundred parsecs. This is reflected in a correlation between the specific star formation rate, and the compactness parameter C, that parametrizes this geometry and hence the evolution of dust temperature (Tdust) with time. As mergers approach coalescence, they depart from the MS and increase their compactness, which implies that moderate outliers of the MS are consistent with late-type mergers. By further applying our method to real observations of luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs), we show that the merger scenario is unable to explain these extreme outliers of the MS. Only by significantly increasing the gas fraction in the simulations are we able to reproduce the SEDs of LIRGs.

Abstract Copyright: ∼

Journal keyword(s): evolution - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: interactions - galaxies: starburst - galaxies: star formation

Simbad objects: 43

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 43
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 2MASS J00401463-4320102 G 00 40 14.636 -43 20 10.21           ~ 6 0
2 ATCDFS J032818.07-274308.6 rG 03 28 18.08 -27 43 08.6   19.039   17.798   ~ 8 0
3 ATCDFS J032904.42-284751.3 rG 03 29 04.43 -28 47 51.3   20.64   18.32   ~ 8 0
4 NGC 2623 LIN 08 38 24.016 +25 45 16.29 14.10 13.99 13.36     ~ 533 2
5 UGC 4881 IG 09 15 55.5 +44 19 58   14.9       ~ 178 0
6 NGC 2976 GiG 09 47 15.458 +67 54 58.97 11.77 11.03 10.16 9.51   ~ 712 1
7 M 81 Sy2 09 55 33.1726556496 +69 03 55.062505368   7.89 6.94     ~ 4725 3
8 M 82 AGN 09 55 52.430 +69 40 46.93 9.61 9.30 8.41     ~ 6156 6
9 NAME COSMOS Field reg 10 00 28.60 +02 12 21.0           ~ 3639 0
10 NGC 3185 Sy2 10 17 38.5650471192 +21 41 17.573817228   12.99 12.17 12.37   ~ 308 1
11 NGC 3187 GiP 10 17 47.8703571264 +21 52 23.984065272 13.71 13.91 13.44 14.06   ~ 166 1
12 NGC 3189 GiP 10 18 05.643 +21 49 54.98 12.60 12.12 11.15 11.14   ~ 422 2
13 2MASS J10323767+5808446 G 10 32 37.480 +58 08 45.91           ~ 7 0
14 [MRH2014] SWIRE5 G 10 35 57.90 +58 58 46.2           ~ 3 0
15 NGC 3395 GiG 10 49 50.1160141680 +32 58 58.421838360   12.1 12.10     ~ 292 1
16 NGC 3396 GiP 10 49 55.939 +32 59 26.44   12.6 12.50     ~ 214 1
17 SDSS J105113.29+571426.7 rG 10 51 13.295 +57 14 26.71           ~ 11 0
18 NGC 3424 AGN 10 51 46.322 +32 54 02.44   13.2       ~ 176 1
19 NGC 3430 GiP 10 52 11.3923421616 +32 57 01.545623100   12.2       ~ 235 0
20 MCG+09-18-052 AG? 10 54 12.756 +54 17 14.08   17       ~ 44 0
21 NGC 3448 AG? 10 54 39.240 +54 18 18.82   12.2       ~ 238 1
22 [MRH2014] SWIRE7 G 11 02 05.70 +57 57 40.6           ~ 3 0
23 IC 694 AG? 11 28 27.312 +58 34 42.29   18.2       ~ 258 2
24 NGC 3690 IG 11 28 31.0 +58 33 41   13.19 12.86     ~ 1015 4
25 NGC 3786 Sy2 11 39 42.5121341928 +31 54 33.971791752   14.62 13.74     ~ 413 1
26 NGC 3788 GiP 11 39 44.5783762224 +31 55 52.367128392   13.30 12.50     ~ 138 1
27 NAME Antennae IG 12 01 53.170 -18 52 37.92           ~ 1749 0
28 NGC 4618 GiP 12 41 32.8976471760 +41 09 03.185175528 11.03 11.22 10.78     ~ 344 2
29 NGC 4625 SyG 12 41 52.7121819576 +41 16 26.115765780 12.74 12.92 12.35     ~ 383 2
30 NGC 4647 H2G 12 43 32.542 +11 34 56.89   12.5 12.5     ~ 423 1
31 M 60 GiC 12 43 39.9708251934 +11 33 09.688174067   10.3       ~ 1395 1
32 Z 43-99 rG 13 01 50.29128 +04 20 00.4488   15.5       ~ 91 0
33 M 51 Sy2 13 29 52.698 +47 11 42.93   9.26 8.36 8.40   ~ 4565 4
34 Z 271-60 Sy2 13 44 42.1883001099 +55 53 13.596220922   15.68 14.91     ~ 958 3
35 NGC 5394 H2G 13 58 33.6405096192 +37 27 12.732147036   13.7 13.12     ~ 215 2
36 NGC 5395 Sy2 13 58 37.9605982608 +37 25 28.161627744   13.26 12.48     ~ 225 1
37 M 101 GiP 14 03 12.583 +54 20 55.50   8.46 7.86 7.76   ~ 3138 2
38 NGC 5474 GiP 14 05 01.608 +53 39 43.95   11.28 10.79     ~ 475 1
39 FIRST J143234.9+332832 rG 14 32 34.9190942760 +33 28 32.547842076       17.72 17.12 ~ 13 1
40 2MASS J14363195+3438292 QSO 14 36 31.9501899912 +34 38 29.123044548       18.75 18.13 ~ 11 1
41 Z 221-50 SyG 15 18 06.1187 +42 44 45.086   15.0 15     ~ 239 1
42 IC 1127 SyG 15 34 57.22396 +23 30 11.6084   14.76 13.88     ~ 3090 4
43 NGC 6090 PaG 16 11 40.3 +52 27 21   14.0       ~ 446 1

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2016ApJ...817...76M and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu