2016MNRAS.459.3161C


Query : 2016MNRAS.459.3161C

2016MNRAS.459.3161C - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 459, 3161-3174 (2016/July-1)

New methods to constrain the radio transient rate: results from a survey of four fields with LOFAR.

CARBONE D., VAN DER HORST A.J., WIJERS R.A.M.J., SWINBANK J.D., ROWLINSON A., BRODERICK J.W., CENDES Y.N., STEWART A.J., BELL M.E., BRETON R.P., CORBEL S., EISLOFFEL J., FENDER R.P., GRIESSMEIER J.-M., HESSELS J.W.T., JONKER P., KRAMER M., LAW C.J., MILLER-JONES J.C.A., PIETKA M., SCHEERS L.H.A., STAPPERS B.W., VAN LEEUWEN J., WIJNANDS R., WISE M. and ZARKA P.

Abstract (from CDS):

We report on the results of a search for radio transients between 115 and 190 MHz with the LOw-Frequency ARray (LOFAR). Four fields have been monitored with cadences between 15 min and several months. A total of 151 images were obtained, giving a total survey area of 2275 deg2. We analysed our data using standard LOFAR tools and searched for radio transients using the LOFAR Transients Pipeline. No credible radio transient candidate has been detected; however, we are able to set upper limits on the surface density of radio transient sources at low radio frequencies. We also show that low-frequency radio surveys are more sensitive to steep-spectrum coherent transient sources than GHz radio surveys. We used two new statistical methods to determine the upper limits on the transient surface density. One is free of assumptions on the flux distribution of the sources, while the other assumes a power-law distribution in flux and sets more stringent constraints on the transient surface density. Both of these methods provide better constraints than the approach used in previous works. The best value for the upper limit we can set for the transient surface density, using the method assuming a power-law flux distribution, is 1.3 x 10–3 deg–2 for transients brighter than 0.3 Jy with a time-scale of 15 min, at a frequency of 150 MHz. We also calculated for the first time upper limits for the transient surface density for transients of different time-scales. We find that the results can differ by orders of magnitude from previously reported, simplified estimates.

Abstract Copyright: © 2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Journal keyword(s): instrumentation: interferometers - methods: data analysis - methods: statistical - techniques: image processing - radio continuum: general - radio continuum: general

Simbad objects: 10

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 10
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME NCP reg 00 00 00 +90 00.0           ~ 216 0
2 3C 196 Sy1 08 13 36.0561170112 +48 13 02.644966020   18.36 17.79     ~ 578 2
3 M 51 Sy2 13 29 52.698 +47 11 42.93   9.26 8.36 8.40   ~ 4565 4
4 SN 1994I SN* 13 29 54.072 +47 11 30.50     12.9     SNIc 645 1
5 3C 286 Sy1 13 31 08.2883506368 +30 30 32.960091564   17.51 17.25     ~ 4558 2
6 3C 295 Sy1 14 11 20.6 +52 12 09   22.34 20.80 18.54   ~ 1021 4
7 GCRT J1742-3001 Rad 17 42 04.67 -30 01 44.5           ~ 10 0
8 PSR J1745-3009 Rad 17 45 05 -30 09.9           ~ 63 0
9 GCRT J1746-2757 Rad 17 46 09.8 -27 57 14           ~ 12 0
10 NAME ILT J225347+862146 ev 22 53 47.10 +86 21 46.4           ~ 5 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2016MNRAS.459.3161C and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu