2016MNRAS.460..569R


Query : 2016MNRAS.460..569R

2016MNRAS.460..569R - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 460, 569-589 (2016/July-3)

AMI observations of 10 CLASH galaxy clusters: SZ and X-ray data used together to determine cluster dynamical states.

RUMSEY C., OLAMAIE M., PERROTT Y.C., RUSSELL H.R., FEROZ F., GRAINGE K.J.B., HANDLEY W.J., HOBSON M.P., SAUNDERS R.D.E. and SCHAMMEL M.P.

Abstract (from CDS):

Using Arcminute Microkelvin Imager (AMI) Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) observations towards 10 CLASH (Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey with Hubble) clusters, we investigate the influence of cluster mergers on observational galaxy cluster studies. Although selected to be largely relaxed, there is disagreement in the literature on the dynamical states of CLASH sample members. We analyse our AMI data in a fully Bayesian way to produce estimated cluster parameters and consider the intrinsic correlations in our Navarro, Frenk and White/generalized Navarro, Frenk and White-based model. Varying pressure profile shape parameters, illustrating an influence of mergers on scaling relations, induces small deviations from the canonical self-similar predictions - in agreement with simulations of Poole et al. (2007) who found that merger activity causes only small scatter perpendicular to the relations. We demonstrate this effect observationally using the different dependences of SZ and X-ray signals to n_e that cause different sensitivities to the shocking and/or fractionation produced by mergers. Plotting YX–Mgas relations (where YX=MgasT) derived from AMI SZ and from Chandra X-ray gives ratios of AMI and ChandraY_X and M_gas estimates that indicate movement of clusters along the scaling relation, as predicted by Poole et al. (2007). Clusters that have moved most along the relation have the most discrepant T_SZ and T_X estimates: all the other clusters (apart from one) have SZ and X-ray estimates of M_gas, T and Y_X that agree within r_500. We use SZ versus X-ray discrepancies in conjunction with Chandra maps and T_X profiles, making comparisons with simulated cluster merger maps in Poole et al. (2006) to identify disturbed members of our sample and estimate merger stages.

Abstract Copyright: © 2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Journal keyword(s): methods: observational - techniques: interferometric - galaxies: clusters: general - large-scale structure of Universe - large-scale structure of Universe

Simbad objects: 13

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 13
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 3C 48 QSO 01 37 41.2996631208 +33 09 35.080388820   16.62 16.20     ~ 2924 2
2 ICRF J054236.1+495107 Sy1 05 42 36.13789710 +49 51 07.2337139   18.45 17.80 17.210   ~ 1573 1
3 ClG J0647+7015 ClG 06 47 50.0 +70 14 55           ~ 177 0
4 ClG J0717+3745 ClG 07 17 36.50 +37 45 23.0           ~ 511 0
5 ClG J0744+3927 ClG 07 44 52.5 +39 27 30           ~ 189 0
6 ACO 611 ClG 08 00 58.7 +36 02 49           ~ 275 0
7 MCS J1149.5+2223 ClG 11 49 35.8 +22 23 55           ~ 546 0
8 ACO 1423 ClG 11 57 17.3206 +33 36 39.364           ~ 181 0
9 ClG J1226+3332 ClG 12 26 57.7 +33 32 50           ~ 228 0
10 3C 286 Sy1 13 31 08.2883506368 +30 30 32.960091564   17.51 17.25     ~ 4558 2
11 ClG J1423+2404 ClG 14 23 47.7 +24 04 40           ~ 231 0
12 ClG J1532+3021 ClG 15 32 53.8 +30 21 00           ~ 122 0
13 ACO 2261 ClG 17 22 26.9 +32 07 58           ~ 370 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2016MNRAS.460..569R and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu