2017ApJ...843...53F


Query : 2017ApJ...843...53F

2017ApJ...843...53F - Astrophys. J., 843, 53-53 (2017/July-1)

The Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey. XXVIII. Characterization of the galactic white dwarf population.

FANTIN N.J., COTE P., HANES D.A., GWYN S.D.J., BIANCHI L., FERRARESE L., CUILLANDRE J.-C., McCONNACHIE A. and STARKENBURG E.

Abstract (from CDS):

We use three different techniques to identify hundreds of white dwarf (WD) candidates in the Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey (NGVS) based on photometry from the NGVS and GUViCS, and proper motions derived from the NGVS and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Photometric distances for these candidates are calculated using theoretical color-absolute magnitude relations, while effective temperatures are measured by fitting their spectral energy distributions. Disk and halo WD candidates are separated using a tangential velocity cut of 200 km s–1 in a reduced proper motion diagram, which leads to a sample of six halo WD candidates. Cooling ages, calculated for an assumed WD mass of 0.6M☉, range between 60 Myr and 6 Gyr, although these estimates depend sensitively on the adopted mass. Luminosity functions for the disk and halo subsamples are constructed and compared to previous results from the SDSS and SuperCOSMOS survey. We compute a number density of (2.81 ± 0.52) x 10–3 pc–3 for the disk WD population-consistent with previous measurements. We find (7.85 ± 4.55) x 10–6 pc–3 for the halo, or 0.3% of the disk. Observed stellar counts are also compared to predictions made by the TRILEGAL and Besancon stellar population synthesis models. The comparison suggests that the TRILEGAL model overpredicts the total number of WDs. The WD counts predicted by the Besancon model agree with the observations, although a discrepancy arises when comparing the predicted and observed halo WD populations; the difference is likely due to the WD masses in the adopted model halo.

Abstract Copyright: © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Journal keyword(s): catalogs - Galaxy: stellar content - stars: kinematics and dynamics - stars: luminosity function, mass function - surveys - white dwarfs - white dwarfs

Nomenclature: Table 4: NGVS JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s N=6.

Simbad objects: 18

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 18
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME Sagittarius Stream St* 02 22 +00.0           ~ 1001 0
2 NAME Hubble Ultra Deep Field reg 03 32 39.0 -27 47 29           ~ 1900 0
3 NGVS J121455.93+125058.4 WD? 12 14 55.9037472960 +12 50 59.231648220           ~ 3 0
4 SDSS J121933.28+163829.9 WD* 12 19 33.27792 +16 38 29.9832           DA: 2 0
5 NGVS J121955.46+151523.1 WD? 12 19 55.4287380864 +15 15 22.858401168           ~ 1 0
6 SDSS J122319.19+050121.4 WD* 12 23 19.1994666600 +05 01 21.438381000           DA 8 0
7 SDSS J122319.58+050121.3 WD* 12 23 19.5877856904 +05 01 21.265465728   17.6   17.7   DA 15 0
8 NGVS J122515.80+064849.2 PM* 12 25 15.8427569688 +06 48 49.458395340           ~ 1 0
9 M 49 Sy2 12 29 46.8 +08 00 01   13.21 12.17     ~ 2174 2
10 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
11 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
12 NAME Vir B Cluster GrG 12 33 39.3 +10 10 57           ~ 143 0
13 NGVS J123614.18+061135.0 WD? 12 36 14.2377545688 +06 11 34.735754508           ~ 2 0
14 NGVS J124516.62+170505.1 WD? 12 45 16.6955310984 +17 05 05.642186640           ~ 2 0
15 M 4 GlC 16 23 35.22 -26 31 32.7           ~ 1978 0
16 NAME Galactic Center reg 17 45 39.60213 -29 00 22.0000           ~ 16269 0
17 NGC 6791 OpC 19 20 52.8 +37 46 40   10.52 9.5     ~ 1120 0
18 NAME HDF-S reg 22 32 56 -60 33.0           ~ 580 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2017ApJ...843...53F and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu