2018A&A...620A.168V


Query : 2018A&A...620A.168V

2018A&A...620A.168V - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 620A168-168 (2018/12-1)

Impact of measurement errors on the inferred stellar asteroseismic ages. Statistical models for intermediate age main sequence and red giant branch stars.

VALLE G., DELL'OMODARME M., PRADA MORONI P.G. and DEGL'INNOCENTI S.

Abstract (from CDS):


Aims. We aim to perform a theoretical investigation on the direct impact of measurement errors in the observational constraints on the recovered age for stars in main sequence (MS) and red giant branch (RGB) phases. We assumed that a mix of classical (effective temperature Teff and metallicity [Fe/H]) and asteroseismic (Δν and νmax) constraints were available for the objects.
Methods. Artificial stars were sampled from a reference isochrone and subjected to random Gaussian perturbation in their observational constraints to simulate observational errors. The ages of these synthetic objects were then recovered by means of a Monte Carlo Markov chains approach over a grid of pre-computed stellar models. To account for observational uncertainties the grid covers different values of initial helium abundance and mixing-length parameter, that act as nuisance parameters in the age estimation.
Results. The obtained differences between the recovered and true ages were modelled against the errors in the observables. This procedure was performed by means of linear models and projection pursuit regression models. The first class of statistical models provides an easily generalizable result, whose robustness is checked with the second method. From linear models we find that no age error source dominates in all the evolutionary phases. Assuming typical observational uncertainties, for MS the most important error source in the reconstructed age is the effective temperature of the star. An offset of 75K accounts for an underestimation of the stellar age from 0.4 to 0.6Gyr for initial and terminal MS. An error of 2.5% in νmax resulted the second most important source of uncertainty accounting for about -0.3Gyr. The 0.1dex error in [Fe/H] resulted particularly important only at the end of the MS, producing an age error of -0.4Gyr. For the RGB phase the dominant source of uncertainty is νmax, causing an underestimation of about 0.6Gyr; the offset in the effective temperature and Δν caused respectively an underestimation and overestimation of 0.3Gyr. We find that the inference from the linear model is a good proxy for that from projection pursuit regression models. Therefore, inference from linear models can be safely used thanks to its broader generalizability. Finally, we explored the impact on age estimates of adding the luminosity to the previously discussed observational constraints. To this purpose, we assumed - for computational reasons - a 2.5% error in luminosity, much lower than the average error in the Gaia DR2 catalogue. However, even in this optimistic case, the addition of the luminosity does not increase precision of age estimates. Moreover, the luminosity resulted as a major contributor to the variability in the estimated ages, accounting for an error of about -0.3Gyr in the explored evolutionary phases.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO 2018

Journal keyword(s): stars: fundamental parameters - methods: statistical - stars: evolution

Simbad objects: 1

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 1
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 6791 OpC 19 20 52.8 +37 46 40   10.52 9.5     ~ 1120 0

Query : 2018A&A...620A.168V

Basic data :
NGC 6791 -- Open Cluster
Other object types:
otypes_help
OpC (2013A&A,OCl), Cl* (2020A&A,C,...)
ICRS coord. (ep=J2000) :
19 20 52.8 +37 46 40 (Optical) [ ] E 2023A&A...674A..37G
FK4 coord. (ep=B1950 eq=1950) :
19 19 07.6 +37 40 57 [ ]
Gal coord. (ep=J2000) :
069.9638 +10.9071 [ ]
Proper motions mas/yr :
-0.421 -2.269 [0.005 0.006 90] C 2020A&A...633A..99C
Radial velocity / Redshift / cz :
V(km/s) -47.75 [0.17] / z(spectroscopic) -0.000159 [0.000001] / cz -47.75 [0.17]
   (Opt) A 2021A&A...647A..19T
Parallaxes (mas):
0.192 [0.002] C 2020A&A...633A..99C
Angular size (arcmin):
8.2 8.2 0 (Opt) D 2020A&A...633A..99C
Fluxes (2) :
B 10.52 [~] E ~
V 9.5 [~] E ~
SIMBAD within arcmin
Overlay Simbad points in this preview
Back
All CDSPortal (CDSPortal)

Send to sendBySAMP sendBySAMP

sedIcon
within arcsec sed-help-icon

Hierarchy : number of linked objects
whatever the membership probability is (see description here ) :

: 2745
Display criteria :

Identifiers (5) :
An access of full data is available using the icon Vizier near the identifier of the catalogue

NGC 6791 Cl Berkeley 46 [KPS2012] MWSC 3088
C 1919+377 OCl 142.0

References (1120 between 1850 and 2026) (Total 1120)
Simbad bibliographic survey began in 1850 for stars (at least bright stars) and in 1983 for all other objects (outside the solar system).
Follow new references on this object
                Reference summaries :

                from: to:

                 or select by : (not exhaustive, explanation here)


Collections of Measurements Description of Measurements

Velocities : 12    Distance : 8    Fe/H : 20    Plx : 8    PM : 13   

   


External archives :

Data at NED - NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database : NGC 6791

Link by name to the catalogue in VizieR :

NGC 6791

Search by coordinates in Vizier (radius: 5 arcsec)


Annotations :
Annotations allow a user to add a note or report an error concerning the astronomical object and its data. It requires registration to post a note. See description .
Please, have a look at Best practices. The list of all annotations to SIMBAD objects can be found here .

The annotation server is currently not available. Sorry for any inconvenience


To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2018A&A...620A.168V and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu