2018MNRAS.476.3729B


Query : 2018MNRAS.476.3729B

2018MNRAS.476.3729B - Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 476, 3729-3743 (2018/May-3)

Establishing the accuracy of asteroseismic mass and radius estimates of giant stars - I. Three eclipsing systems at [Fe/H] ∼ -0.3 and the need for a large high-precision sample.

BROGAARD K., HANSEN C.J., MIGLIO A., SLUMSTRUP D., FRANDSEN S., JESSEN-HANSEN J., LUND M.N., BOSSINI D., THYGESEN A., DAVIES G.R., CHAPLIN W.J., ARENTOFT T., BRUNTT H., GRUNDAHL F. and HANDBERG R.

Abstract (from CDS):

We aim to establish and improve the accuracy level of asteroseismic estimates of mass, radius, and age of giant stars. This can be achieved by measuring independent, accurate, and precise masses, radii, effective temperatures and metallicities of long period eclipsing binary stars with a red giant component that displays solar-like oscillations. We measured precise properties of the three eclipsing binary systems KIC 7037405, KIC 9540226, and KIC 9970396 and estimated their ages be 5.3 ± 0.5, 3.1 ± 0.6, and 4.8 ± 0.5 Gyr. The measurements of the giant stars were compared to corresponding measurements of mass, radius, and age using asteroseismic scaling relations and grid modelling. We found that asteroseismic scaling relations without corrections to Δν systematically overestimate the masses of the three red giants by 11.7 per cent, 13.7 per cent, and 18.9 per cent, respectively. However, by applying theoretical correction factors fΔν according to Rodrigues et al. (2017), we reached general agreement between dynamical and asteroseismic mass estimates, and no indications of systematic differences at the precision level of the asteroseismic measurements. The larger sample investigated by Gaulme et al. (2016) showed a much more complicated situation, where some stars show agreement between the dynamical and corrected asteroseismic measures while others suggest significant overestimates of the asteroseismic measures. We found no simple explanation for this, but indications of several potential problems, some theoretical, others observational. Therefore, an extension of the present precision study to a larger sample of eclipsing systems is crucial for establishing and improving the accuracy of asteroseismology of giant stars.

Abstract Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Journal keyword(s): binaries: eclipsing - stars: evolution - stars: fundamental parameters - stars: individual: (KIC 7037405, KIC 9540226, KIC 9970396) - Galaxy: stellar content

Simbad objects: 14

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 14
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 Cl* NGC 104 WSB V69 EB* 00 22 52.951 -72 03 40.68           ~ 30 0
2 NGC 104 GlC 00 24 05.359 -72 04 53.20     4.09     ~ 4158 0
3 TYC 3130-2385-1 EB* 18 48 38.0888392752 +44 29 09.855904776   12.18 11.33     ~ 61 0
4 TYC 3546-941-1 RG* 19 07 49.3734544464 +46 56 11.865353964   11.48 10.39     K0IV 54 0
5 2MASS J19210141+4101049 EB* 19 21 01.4107302168 +41 01 04.925030484           K2III 28 0
6 KOI-3873 RG* 19 26 14.0686055016 +44 29 17.431879668   11.44 10.61     ~ 42 0
7 2MASS J19315429+4232516 RG* 19 31 54.2896822536 +42 32 51.641296872           ~ 44 0
8 2MASS J19364769+3945288 RG* 19 36 47.6957334360 +39 45 28.737722448           ~ 33 0
9 NGC 6811 OpC 19 37 21.8 +46 22 43   7.47 6.8     ~ 435 0
10 NGC 6819 OpC 19 41 18.3 +40 11 19   8.21 7.3     ~ 719 0
11 2MASS J19434330+4257043 EB* 19 43 43.3026322992 +42 57 04.280814252           ~ 25 0
12 TYC 3557-221-1 SB* 19 48 08.1620215896 +46 11 54.564197784   12.75 12.44     G6V 56 0
13 KOI-7606 RG* 19 54 50.3553370248 +46 49 58.910407356           G6V 54 0
14 HD 190585 EB* 20 03 48.3209367264 +45 36 14.805207576   10.74 9.65     K2 51 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2018MNRAS.476.3729B and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu