2019A&A...625A..32B


Query : 2019A&A...625A..32B

2019A&A...625A..32B - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 625A32-32 (2019/5-1)

Study of gravitational fields and globular cluster systems of early-type galaxies.

BILEK M., SAMUROVIC S. and RENAUD F.

Abstract (from CDS):


Context. Gravitational fields at the outskirts of early-type galaxies (ETGs) are difficult to constrain observationally. It thus remains poorly explored how well the ΛCDM and MOND hypotheses agree with ETGs.
Aims. The dearth of studies on this topic motivated us to gather a large sample of ETGs and examine homogeneously which dark matter halos they occupy, whether the halos follow the theoretically predicted stellar-to-halo mass relation (SHMR) and the halo mass-concentration relation (HMCR), whether ETGs obey MOND and the radial acceleration relation (RAR) observed for late-type galaxies (LTGs), and finally whether ΛCDM or MOND perform better in ETGs.
Methods. We employed Jeans analysis of radial velocities of globular clusters (GCs). We analysed nearly all ETGs having more than about 100 archival GC radial velocity measurements available. The GC systems of our 17 ETGs extend mostly over ten effective radii. A ΛCDM simulation of GC formation helped us to interpret the results.
Results. Successful ΛCDM fits are found for all galaxies, but compared to the theoretical HMCR and SHMR, the best-fit halos usually have concentrations that are too low and stellar masses that are too high for their masses. This might be because of tidal stripping of the halos or because ETGs and LTGs occupy different halos. Most galaxies can be fitted by the MOND models successfully as well, but for some of the galaxies, especially those in centers of galaxy clusters, the observed GC velocity dispersions are too high. This might be a manifestation of the additional dark matter that MOND requires in galaxy clusters. Additionally, we find many signs that the GC systems were perturbed by galaxy interactions. Formal statistical criteria prefer the best-fit ΛCDM models over the MOND models, but this might be due to the higher flexibility of the ΛCDM models. The MOND approach can predict the GC velocity dispersion profiles better.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO 2019

Journal keyword(s): gravitation - galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics - galaxies: interactions - galaxies: halos - galaxies: clusters: general

Simbad objects: 28

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 28
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 7814 GiG 00 03 14.947 +16 08 42.82   12.0       ~ 313 1
2 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
3 NGC 821 AG? 02 08 21.1358498040 +10 59 41.832436704   12.210 11.310 10.739 9.744 ~ 592 0
4 NGC 1023 AG? 02 40 24.0133575864 +39 03 47.663392896 10.91 10.35 9.35 7.83   ~ 689 2
5 NGC 1399 rG 03 38 29.083 -35 27 02.67 11.05 9.74 9.59 8.12   ~ 1636 1
6 ACO S 373 ClG 03 38 29.4 -35 27 08           ~ 2029 0
7 NGC 1400 EmG 03 39 30.851 -18 41 17.25 12.48 12.01 10.96 10.45   ~ 309 1
8 NGC 1407 rG 03 40 11.904 -18 34 49.36   10.64 9.67 9.13   ~ 613 2
9 NGC 2768 SyG 09 11 37.504 +60 02 13.95 11.30 10.84 9.87     ~ 526 2
10 NGC 3115 GiG 10 05 13.9270507008 -07 43 06.982712292   11   9.37   ~ 1067 2
11 NAME Hydra I Cluster ClG 10 36 36.0 -27 31 04           ~ 905 1
12 NGC 3311 EmG 10 36 42.821 -27 31 42.02   11.93 10.93 10.00 9.67 ~ 310 2
13 NGC 3377 GiP 10 47 42.400 +13 59 08.30 11.55 11.24 10.38     ~ 798 1
14 NGC 4278 LIN 12 20 06.8242 +29 16 50.722 11.54 11.09 10.16     ~ 988 2
15 NGC 4342 GiP 12 23 39.0032044488 +07 03 14.359499100   13.0       ~ 337 0
16 NGC 4365 GiG 12 24 28.228 +07 19 03.07   11.5       ~ 871 0
17 M 86 GiG 12 26 11.814 +12 56 45.49 10.32 9.83 8.90   7.50 ~ 1126 1
18 M 49 Sy2 12 29 46.8 +08 00 01   13.21 12.17     ~ 2174 2
19 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
20 M 87 AGN 12 30 49.42338414 +12 23 28.0436859 10.16 9.59 8.63   7.49 ~ 7815 3
21 NGC 4494 GiP 12 31 24.0391348536 +25 46 30.071664120   10.55 9.74     ~ 491 0
22 NGC 4526 GiC 12 34 03.02853 +07 41 56.9040   10.6       ~ 707 0
23 M 60 GiC 12 43 39.9708251934 +11 33 09.688174067   10.3       ~ 1395 1
24 NGC 4886 EmG 13 00 04.4494334064 +27 59 15.306472032 15.595 15.1 14.294 13.712 13.092 ~ 134 0
25 NAME Centaurus A BLL 13 25 27.61521044 -43 01 08.8050291   8.18 6.84 6.66   ~ 4774 3
26 NGC 5846 rG 15 06 29.253 +01 36 20.29   11.9   9.74   ~ 891 2
27 NGC 5850 LIN 15 07 07.6828131840 +01 32 39.513281352   11.5   10.79 11.1 ~ 330 1
28 NAME Local Group GrG ~ ~           ~ 9325 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2019A&A...625A..32B and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu