2020A&A...633A.144V


Query : 2020A&A...633A.144V

2020A&A...633A.144V - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 633A144-144 (2020/1-1)

Deciphering the radio star formation correlation on kpc scales. I. Adaptive kernel smoothing experiments.

VOLLMER B., SOIDA M., BECK R. and POWALKA M.

Abstract (from CDS):

One of the tightest correlations in astronomy is the relation between the integrated radio continuum and the far-infrared (FIR) emission. Within nearby galaxies, variations in the radio-FIR correlation have been observed, mainly because the cosmic ray electrons migrate before they lose their energy via synchrotron emission or escape. The major cosmic-ray electron transport mechanisms within the plane of galactic disks are diffusion, and streaming. A predicted radio continuum map can be obtained by convolving the map of cosmic-ray electron sources, represented by that of the star formation, with adaptive Gaussian and exponential kernels. The ratio between the smoothing lengthscales at 6cm and 20cm can be used to determine, between diffusion and streaming, which is the dominant transport mechanism. The dependence of the smoothing lengthscale on the star formation rate bears information on the dependence of the magnetic field strength, or the ratio between the ordered and turbulent magnetic field strengths on star formation. Star formation maps of eight rather face-on local and Virgo cluster spiral galaxies were constructed from Spitzer and Herschel infrared and GALEX UV observations. These maps were convolved with adaptive Gaussian and exponential smoothing kernels to obtain model radio continuum emission maps. It was found that in asymmetric ridges of polarized radio continuum emission, the total power emission is enhanced with respect to the star formation rate. At a characteristic star formation rate of dΣ*/dt=8x10-3M☉/yr/kpc2, the typical lengthscale for the transport of cosmic-ray electrons is l=0.9±0.3kpc at 6cm, and l=1.8±0.5kpc at 20cm. Perturbed spiral galaxies tend to have smaller lengthscales. This is a natural consequence of the enhancement of the magnetic field caused by the interaction. The discrimination between the two cosmic-ray electron transport mechanisms, diffusion, and streaming is based on (i) the convolution kernel (Gaussian or exponential); (ii) the dependence of the smoothing kernel on the local magnetic field, and thus on the local star formation rate; (iii) the ratio between the two smoothing lengthscales via the frequency dependence of the smoothing kernel, and (iv) the dependence of the smoothing kernel on the ratio between the ordered and the turbulent magnetic field. Based on our empirical results, methods (i) and (ii) cannot be used to determine the cosmic ray transport mechanism. Important asymmetric large-scale residuals and a local dependence of the smoothing length on Bord/Bturb are most probably responsible for the failure of methods (i) and (ii), respectively. On the other hand, the classifications based on l6cm/l20cm (method iii) and Bord/Bturb (method iv), are well consistent and complementary. We argue that in the six Virgo spiral galaxies, the turbulent magnetic field is globally enhanced in the disk. Therefore, the regions where the magnetic field is independent of the star formation rate are more common. In addition, Bord/Bturb decreases, leading to a diffusion lengthscale that is smaller than the streaming lengthscale. Therefore, cosmic ray electron streaming dominates in most of the Virgo spiral galaxies.

Abstract Copyright: © B. Vollmer et al. 2020

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: ISM - galaxies: magnetic fields - galaxies: star formation

Simbad objects: 19

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 19
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 M 31 AGN 00 42 44.330 +41 16 07.50 4.86 4.36 3.44     ~ 13622 1
2 NGC 451 GiG 01 16 12.395 +33 03 50.75   14.8       ~ 51 0
3 M 33 GiG 01 33 50.8965749232 +30 39 36.630403128 6.17 6.27 5.72     ~ 6226 1
4 M 99 H2G 12 18 49.625 +14 24 59.36 10.45 10.44 9.87     ~ 1004 2
5 NGC 4298 GiC 12 21 32.7578814360 +14 36 22.048690716   12.04 11.34     ~ 358 1
6 NGC 4299 GiC 12 21 40.548 +11 29 59.74   12.8       ~ 271 0
7 M 61 Sy2 12 21 54.9282582888 +04 28 25.597367184 10.07 10.18 9.65     ~ 1084 1
8 M 100 AGN 12 22 54.9299993592 +15 49 20.296257960 10.04 10.05 9.35     ~ 1963 2
9 NGC 4330 GiG 12 23 17.249 +11 22 04.73   14.0       ~ 246 0
10 NGC 4396 GiC 12 25 58.802 +15 40 17.28 12.94 13.06 12.58     ~ 207 1
11 NGC 4457 LIN 12 28 59.0252479200 +03 34 14.215556928   11.9       ~ 342 0
12 NAME Virgo Cluster ClG 12 30 47.8 +12 23 07           ~ 7107 0
13 M 88 Sy2 12 31 59.1525062448 +14 25 13.148971824   14.33 13.18     ~ 843 1
14 NGC 4522 GiG 12 33 39.657 +09 10 29.54   13.6       ~ 396 0
15 NGC 4532 H2G 12 34 19.329 +06 28 03.73   12.3       ~ 304 2
16 NGC 4535 H2G 12 34 20.3443516704 +08 11 51.908488116   11.1       ~ 679 0
17 NGC 4654 H2G 12 43 56.638 +13 07 34.86   11.8       ~ 600 1
18 M 51 Sy2 13 29 52.698 +47 11 42.93   9.26 8.36 8.40   ~ 4565 4
19 NGC 6946 H2G 20 34 52.332 +60 09 13.24   10.5       ~ 2661 2

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2020A&A...633A.144V and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu