2020A&A...634A..11D


Query : 2020A&A...634A..11D

2020A&A...634A..11D - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 634A11-11 (2020/2-1)

Structural analysis of massive galaxies using HST deep imaging at z < 0.5.

DOS REIS S.N., BUITRAGO F., PAPADEROS P., MATUTE I., AFONSO J., AMARANTIDIS S., BREDA I., GOMES J.M., HUMPHREY A., LOBO C., LORENZONI S., PAPPALARDO C., PAULINO-AFONSO A. and SCOTT T.

Abstract (from CDS):

Context. The most massive galaxies (Mstellar≥1011M☉) in the local Universe are characterized by a bulge-dominated morphology and old stellar populations, in addition to being confined to a tight mass-size relation. Identifying their main components can provide insights into their formation mechanisms and subsequent mass assembly. Aims. Taking advantage of Hubble Space Telescope (HST) CANDELS data, we analyze the lowest redshift (z<0.5) massive galaxies in the H and I band in order to disentangle their structural constituents and study possible faint non-axisymmetric features. Methods. Our final sample consists of 17 massive galaxies. Due to the excellent HST spatial resolution for intermediate redshift objects, they are hard to model by purely automatic parametric fitting algorithms. We performed careful single and double (bulge-disk decompositions) Sersic fits to their galaxy surface brightness profiles. We compare the model color profiles with the observed ones and also derive multi-component global effective radii attempting to obtain a better interpretation of the mass-size relation. Additionally, we test the robustness of our measured structural parameters via simulations. Results. We find that the Sersic index does not offer a good proxy for the visual morphological type for our sample of massive galaxies. Our derived multi-component effective radii give a better description of the size of our sample galaxies than those inferred from single Sersic models with GALFIT. Our galaxy population lies on the scatter of the local mass-size relation, indicating that these massive galaxies have not experienced a significant growth in size since z∼0.5. Interestingly, the few outliers are late-type galaxies, indicating that spheroids must reach the local mass-size relation earlier. For most of our sample galaxies, both single- and multi-component Sersic models withGALFIT show substantial systematic deviations from the observed surface brightness profiles in the outskirts. These residuals may be partly due to several factors, namely a nonoptimal data reduction for low surface brightness features or the existence of prominent stellar haloes for massive galaxies, or they could also arise from conceptual shortcomings of parametric 2D image decomposition tools. They consequently propagate into galaxy color profiles. This is a significant obstacle to the exploration of the structural evolution of galaxies, which calls for a critical assessment and refinement of existing surface photometry techniques.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO 2020

Journal keyword(s): galaxies: evolution - galaxies: structure - galaxies: photometry

Simbad objects: 17

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 17
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NAME GOODS Southern Field reg 03 32 28.0 -27 48 30           ~ 1623 1
2 SDSS J100013.92+022249.5 rG 10 00 13.929 +02 22 49.58         18.553 ~ 41 0
3 SDSS J100019.34+022325.1 QSO 10 00 19.329 +02 23 24.94   22.141 20.887   18.76 ~ 33 0
4 ZFOURGE COSMOS 2859 rG 10 00 21.77 +02 12 20.5 24.107 22.84 21.380 20.542 19.834 ~ 22 0
5 SDSS J100022.81+021801.9 rG 10 00 22.826 +02 18 01.80 22.982 21.786 20.319 19.659 19.008 ~ 29 0
6 NAME COSMOS Field reg 10 00 28.60 +02 12 21.0           ~ 3639 0
7 COSMOS2015 759643 G 10 00 43.72 +02 27 04.9 22.891 22.184 20.987 20.338 19.712 ~ 10 0
8 GNS 4165 G 12 35 55.3776 +62 10 51.421 24.20 22.8261   20.3 19.5569 ~ 17 0
9 NAME GOODS-N Field reg 12 36 55.0 +62 14 15           ~ 1364 1
10 GOODS J123724.34+622157.8 rG 12 37 24.371 +62 21 57.54 22.2 20.7233 18.89 19.4 18.4114 ~ 15 0
11 TKRS 7751 G 12 37 39.6376390800 +62 17 50.434885860 23.28 21.6033 20.5414 19.6 19.0852 ~ 11 0
12 GOODS J123740.94+621517.5 rG 12 37 40.931 +62 15 17.18 22.42 21.0781 21.456 20.00 18.9487 ~ 15 0
13 GOODS J123753.29+621454.2 G 12 37 53.324 +62 14 53.81 24.91 23.3483 21.03 20.9 20.0380 ~ 15 0
14 NAME Extended Groth Strip reg 14 19 +52.8           ~ 1023 0
15 2MASS J14191026+5251510 rG 14 19 10.2738467208 +52 51 51.182439948   17.5   16.21 15.67 ~ 13 0
16 CANDELS EGS F160W J142043.3+525945.6 AGN 14 20 43.3006154544 +52 59 45.572401392         18.51 ~ 7 0
17 CANDELS EGS F160W J142052.7+530440.2 G 14 20 52.67 +53 04 40.1   24.7   23.95 23.95 ~ 5 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2020A&A...634A..11D and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu