2020A&A...638A..83W


Query : 2020A&A...638A..83W

2020A&A...638A..83W - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 638A83-83 (2020/6-1)

44Ti ejecta in young supernova remnants.

WEINBERGER C., DIEHL R., PLEINTINGER M.M.M., SIEGERT T. and GREINER J.

Abstract (from CDS):


Context. Tracing unstable isotopes produced in supernova nucleosynthesis provides a direct diagnostic of supernova explosion physics. Theoretical models predict an extensive variety of scenarios, which can be constrained through observations of the abundant isotopes 56Ni and 44Ti. Direct evidence of the latter was previously found only in two core-collapse supernova events, and appears to be absent in thermonuclear supernovae.
Aims. We aim to to constrain the supernova progenitor types of Cassiopeia A, SN 1987A, Vela Jr., G1.9+0.3, SN1572, and SN1604 through their 44Ti ejecta masses and explosion kinematics.
Methods. We analyzed INTEGRAL/SPI observations of the candidate sources utilizing an empirically motivated high-precision background model. We analyzed the three dominant spectroscopically resolved de-excitation lines at 68, 78, and 1157 keV emitted in the decay chain of 44Ti-44Sc-44Ca. The fluxes allow the determination of the production yields of 44Ti. Remnant kinematics were obtained from the Doppler characteristics of the lines.
Results. We find a significant signal for Cassiopeia A in all three lines with a combined significance of 5.4σ. The fluxes are (3.3±0.9)x10–5ph/cm2/s, and (4.2±1.0)x10–5ph/cm2/s for the 44Ti and 44Sc decay, respectively. This corresponds to a mass of (2.4±0.7)x10–4M☉ and (3.1±0.8)x10–4M☉, respectively. We obtain higher fluxes for 44Ti with our analysis of Cassiopeia A than were obtained in previous analyses. We discuss potential differences. We interpret the line width from Doppler broadening as expansion velocity of (6400±1900)km/s. We do not find any significant signal for any other candidate sources.
Conclusions. We obtain a high 44Ti ejecta mass for Cassiopeia A that is in disagreement with ejecta yields from symmetric 2D models. Upper limits for the other core-collapse supernovae are in agreement with model predictions and previous studies. The upper limits we find for the three thermonuclear supernovae (G1.9+0.3, SN1572 and SN1604) consistently exclude the double detonation and pure helium deflagration models as progenitors.

Abstract Copyright: © C. Weinberger et al. 2020

Journal keyword(s): ISM: supernova remnants - nuclear reactions - nucleosynthesis - abundances - gamma rays: ISM

Simbad objects: 12

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 12
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 SN 1572A SN* 00 25 21.5 +64 08 27           B8 1254 1
2 NAME LMC G 05 23 34.6 -69 45 22     0.4     ~ 19090 0
3 SN 1987A SN* 05 35 27.98840 -69 16 11.1134           SNIIpec 5203 2
4 PSR B0540-69 Psr 05 40 11.2000490438 -69 19 54.198559829           ~ 976 3
5 NAME Vela SNR 08 34.0 -45 50           ~ 1331 2
6 NAME Vela Jr SN SNR 08 52.0 -46 20           ~ 507 2
7 NGC 4388 Sy2 12 25 46.820 +12 39 43.45 11.91 11.76 11.02     ~ 1433 2
8 NAME Kepler's SN SNR 17 30 40.51 -21 29 14.4           ~ 851 3
9 NAME Galactic Center reg 17 45 39.60213 -29 00 22.0000           ~ 16269 0
10 SNR G001.9+00.3 SNR 17 48 46.02 -27 09 52.0           ~ 243 1
11 NAME Cas A SNR 23 23 26.0 +58 48 41     14.30     ~ 3033 1
12 NAME Vela Field reg ~ ~           ~ 200 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2020A&A...638A..83W and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu