2020A&A...644A.166S


Query : 2020A&A...644A.166S

2020A&A...644A.166S - Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 644A166-166 (2020/12-1)

The RGB tip of galactic globular clusters and the revision of the axion-electron coupling bound.

STRANIERO O., PALLANCA C., DALESSANDRO E., DOMINGUEZ I., FERRARO F.R., GIANNOTTI M., MIRIZZI A. and PIERSANTI L.

Abstract (from CDS):


Context. The production of neutrinos by plasma oscillations is the most important energy sink process operating in the degenerate core of low-mass red giant stars. This process counterbalances the release of energy induced by nuclear reactions and gravitational contraction, and determines the luminosity attained by a star at the moment of the He ignition. This occurrence coincides with the tip of the red giant branch (RGB), whose luminosity is extensively used as a calibrated standard candle in several cosmological studies.
Aims. We aim to investigate the possible activation of additional energy sink mechanisms, as predicted by many extensions of the so-called Standard Model. In particular, our objective is to test the possible production of axions or axion-like particles, mainly through their coupling with electrons.
Methods. By combining Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based optical and near-infrared photometric samples, we derived the RGB tip absolute magnitude of 22 galactic globular clusters (GGCs). The effects of varying the distance and the metallicity scales were also investigated. Then we compared the observed tip luminosities with those predicted by state-of-the-art stellar models that include the energy loss due to the axion production in the degenerate core of red giant stars.
Results. We find that theoretical predictions including only the energy loss by plasma neutrinos are, in general, in good agreement with the observed tip bolometric magnitudes, even though the latter are ∼0.04 mag brighter on average. This small shift may be the result of systematic errors affecting the evaluation of the RGB tip bolometric magnitudes, or, alternatively, it could be ascribed to an axion-electron coupling causing a non-negligible thermal production of axions. In order to estimate the strength of this possible axion sink, we performed a cumulative likelihood analysis using the RGB tips of the whole set of 22 GGCs. All the possible sources of uncertainties affecting both the measured bolometric magnitudes and the corresponding theoretical predictions were carefully considered. As a result, we find that the value of the axion-electron coupling parameter that maximizes the likelihood probability is gae/10–13∼0.60–0.58+0.32. This hint is valid, however, if the dominant energy sinks operating in the core of red giant stars are standard neutrinos and axions coupled with electrons. Any additional energy-loss process, not included in the stellar models, would reduce such a hint. Nevertheless, we find that values gae/10–13>1.48 can be excluded with 95% confidence.
Conclusions. The new bound we find represents the most stringent constraint for the axion-electron coupling available so far. The new scenario that emerges after this work represents a greater challenge for future experimental axion searches. In particular, we can exclude that the recent signal seen by the XENON1T experiment was due to solar axions.

Abstract Copyright: © ESO 2020

Journal keyword(s): elementary particles - stars: low-mass - globular clusters: general - Hertzsprung-Russell - C-M diagrams

Simbad objects: 25

goto Full paper

goto View the references in ADS

Number of rows : 25
N Identifier Otype ICRS (J2000)
RA
ICRS (J2000)
DEC
Mag U Mag B Mag V Mag R Mag I Sp type #ref
1850 - 2026
#notes
1 NGC 104 GlC 00 24 05.359 -72 04 53.20     4.09     ~ 4158 0
2 NAME SMC G 00 52 38.0 -72 48 01   2.79 2.2     ~ 12317 1
3 NGC 288 GlC 00 52 45.24 -26 34 57.4   10 8.13     ~ 1130 0
4 NGC 362 GlC 01 03 14.26 -70 50 55.6     6.58     ~ 1167 0
5 M 68 GlC 12 39 27.98 -26 44 38.6     7.96     ~ 1069 0
6 NGC 5139 GlC 13 26 47.28 -47 28 46.1           ~ 3677 0
7 M 3 GlC 13 42 11.62 +28 22 38.2     6.39     ~ 2593 0
8 M 5 GlC 15 18 33.22 +02 04 51.7     5.95     ~ 2095 0
9 M 107 GlC 16 32 31.86 -13 03 13.6           ~ 835 0
10 M 13 GlC 16 41 41.634 +36 27 40.75     5.8     ~ 2291 0
11 M 10 GlC 16 57 09.05 -04 06 01.1     4.98     ~ 857 0
12 M 92 GlC 17 17 07.39 +43 08 09.4     6.52     ~ 2240 0
13 NGC 6342 GlC 17 21 10.14 -19 35 14.7     10.01     ~ 310 0
14 NGC 6380 GlC 17 34 28.00 -39 04 09.0           ~ 175 0
15 NGC 6461 G 17 38 42.3919666392 +73 30 56.599548120   15.7       ~ 7 0
16 NGC 6440 GlC 17 48 52.67 -20 21 34.5           ~ 592 0
17 NGC 6441 GlC 17 50 13.06 -37 03 05.2           ~ 940 0
18 NGC 6528 GlC 18 04 49.61 -30 03 20.8   12.12 10.65     ~ 561 0
19 NGC 6553 GlC 18 09 15.68 -25 54 27.9   9.08       ~ 644 0
20 NGC 6624 GlC 18 23 40.51 -30 21 39.7           ~ 939 1
21 M 69 GlC 18 31 23.10 -32 20 53.1           ~ 492 0
22 NGC 6752 GlC 19 10 52.11 -59 59 04.4           ~ 2121 0
23 M 55 GlC 19 39 59.71 -30 57 53.1     6.49     ~ 913 0
24 M 15 GlC 21 29 58.33 +12 10 01.2           ~ 3274 0
25 M 30 GlC 21 40 22.12 -23 10 47.5     7.10     ~ 1121 0

To bookmark this query, right click on this link: simbad:objects in 2020A&A...644A.166S and select 'bookmark this link' or equivalent in the popup menu